FTC Invites Public Comment on 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking

FTC Invites Public Comment on 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking

WASHINGTON — The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced this week that it is seeking public comment on whether it should amend its Negative Option Rule to better address deceptive or unfair practices.

The announcement marks the latest step in the FTC’s effort to renew rulemaking concerning negative option plans, after a federal court last year vacated a “click to cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions. That decision came after critics objected that the agency exceeded its authority and skirted procedural rules by failing to issue a preliminary regulatory analysis.

In January, the FTC submitted a draft Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) concerning its Negative Option Rule to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs for review.

This week's announcement invites input on that ANPRM, stating, “The ANPRM asks the public: to weigh in on the current Rule; whether proposed amendments are needed; and about potential regulatory alternatives to address deceptive or unfair negative option practices.”

Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, explained the agency’s rationale for the proposed rulemaking.

“Negative option subscriptions can offer procompetitive features to consumers and the marketplace more broadly by lowering transaction costs and ensuring consumers receive uninterrupted service,” Mufarrige said. “The Commission’s enforcement track record suggests, however, that negative option subscriptions continue to be plagued by difficult cancellation processes, unlawful retention tactics, and a suite of other impediments that prevent consumers from easily switching or ending subscription services. Neither consumers nor competition are protected when consumers are enrolled in programs that they either do not want or cannot cancel.”

The Negative Option Rule was originally adopted in the 1970s to protect consumers from being automatically enrolled in subscription plans without their consent. As amended in 2024, the rule would have been applied to almost all negative option programs, including automatic renewal and free-to-pay offers. Had the update not been vacated, such changes would likely have required website operators to make substantial changes to sign-up and cancellation practices.

The current reinitiated process could lead to the FTC proposing the same or similar changes.

Now that the ANPRM has been published in the Federal Register, the comment period will be open until April 13. Members of the public can submit comments here.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Pineapple Support Names Ny Ny Lew Brand Ambassador

Pineapple Support has named Ny Ny Lew as its newest brand ambassador.

Federal AV Proposal Passes House, Faces Senate Opposition

The U.S. House of Representatives on Monday passed the Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act, which includes provisions to make age verification by adult websites federal law, but the bill still faces tough going in the Senate.

Devin Drills Launches New Paysite

Creator Devin Drills has launched an official website through PAYSITE.

AV Bulletin: Midyear Roundup

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, more state age verification laws have been enacted around the United States, as well as proposed at the federal level and in other countries. Meanwhile, lawsuits resulting from AV laws have begun to play out in the courts. This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Judge Dismisses Last NCOSE-Backed Suit Over Kansas AV Law

A federal judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit alleging that adult site SuperPorn violated Kansas’ age verification law, citing lack of jurisdiction after similarly dismissing two related cases earlier this year.

ASACP Updates 'Restricted to Adults' Labeling Resource Page

The Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) has updated its Restricted to Adults (RTA) labeling resource page.

Federal AV Proposal Scores Minor Win in House but Remains in Doubt

A newly announced bipartisan agreement in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce may soon bring a proposed federal age verification law before the full House, but the measure continues to face an uphill battle.

Arizona Governor Vetoes 'Protect Act' With New Consent Provisions

Arizona Governor Kate Hobbs on Friday vetoed HB 2133, the “Protect Act,” which would have imposed new requirements for adult content uploaded online.

Brazil Begins Monitoring 18 Adult Sites for AV Compliance

Brazil’s National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) is now monitoring 18 high-traffic adult websites for compliance with the country’s Digital Statute for Children and Adolescents (Digital ECA), which requires such sites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Ofcom Fines First Time Videos $100,000 for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Thursday imposed a fine of 80,000 pounds (more than $100,000) against First Time Videos, which operates FTVGirls.com and FTVMilfs.com, for failing to implement age checks required for compliance with the Online Safety Act.

Show More