opinion

Understanding the FTC's New 'Click to Cancel' Rule

Understanding the FTC's New 'Click to Cancel' Rule

The Federal Trade Commission’s new “Click to Cancel” rule has been a hot topic in consumer protection and business regulation. Part of a broader effort to streamline cancellation processes for subscription services, the rule has sparked significant debate and legal challenges.

Adult subscription services are justifiably concerned. Adult companies to which the rule applies should be following these developments closely and preparing for compliance. The following background and insights should assist with that process.

In short, the rule aims to address consumer complaints about predatory practices where companies make cancellations deliberately complicated.

What Is the ‘Click to Cancel’ Rule?

The “Click to Cancel” rule is a significant regulation aimed at making it simpler for consumers to cancel recurring subscriptions and memberships. It mandates that businesses make it as easy to cancel a subscription as it was to sign up for it. The rule is part of the FTC’s broader effort to protect consumers from deceptive practices associated with negative option marketing, where a consumer’s failure to take action is interpreted as consent to continue a service.

In short, the rule aims to address consumer complaints about predatory practices where companies make cancellations deliberately complicated, locking customers into unwanted subscriptions.

What Does the “Click to Cancel” Rule Require?

In broad strokes, the Click to Cancel Rule requires:

  • Simple Cancellation Mechanism: Businesses must provide a straightforward method for consumers to cancel their subscriptions. If a consumer can sign up online, they must also be able to cancel online in a similar number of steps.
  • Clear Disclosures: Companies are required to clearly disclose all material terms before obtaining a consumer’s billing information. This includes information about the subscription’s cost, duration and how to cancel.
  • Informed Consent: Businesses must obtain explicit consent from consumers before charging them for a subscription. This ensures that consumers are fully aware of what they are agreeing to.
  • Prohibition of Misleading Practices: The rule forbids material misrepresentations in connection with the sale of a product or service that includes a negative option feature.

Impact of the ‘Click to Cancel’ Rule

Assuming that the rule survives the legal challenges against it, which are discussed below, its impact will be substantial for businesses and consumers alike. Businesses will have to make operational changes and update their cancellation mechanisms. This will be challenging for smaller businesses due to the costs associated with implementing systems to comply with the new requirements. On the opposite end of the spectrum, consumers are celebrating because the rule simplifies the cancellation process, reducing frustration for those seeking to end subscriptions, and because it requires greater upfront clarity on subscription terms, which can help consumers make informed decisions.

The NCTA Lawsuit

New FTC rules have historically resulted in legal challenges and the “Click to Cancel” rule is no different. The National Cable and Telecommunications Association (NCTA), representing major broadband and cable companies, has filed a lawsuit challenging the FTC’s authority to implement the new rule. In its legal challenge, the NCTA raises the following main arguments.

  • Overreach of Authority: The NCTA argues that the FTC cannot unilaterally impose such detailed rules without clear legislative backing, and therefore exceeded its authority under the Federal Trade Commission Act.
  • First Amendment Concerns: According to the NCTA, the rule infringes on companies’ rights to communicate with customers, particularly their ability to offer discounts or incentives to retain subscribers.
  • Economic Impact: The NCTA contends that compliance with the rule would impose undue financial burdens on businesses, particularly smaller providers that lack sophisticated online platforms.

The FTC, however, defends the rule as essential for consumer protection against deceptive subscription practices. It holds that the rule empowers consumers to easily cancel unwanted subscriptions by reducing the frustration of complex cancellation processes.

The Implications

The outcome of the NCTA lawsuit could have far-reaching implications. A victory for the FTC would reaffirm the agency’s authority to impose rules aimed at consumer protection, potentially paving the way for further regulation in the subscription economy. Conversely, a ruling in favor of the NCTA could limit the FTC’s authority, shifting the regulatory landscape.

As the NCTA lawsuit unfolds, businesses should closely monitor the situation — but should also consider preparing for compliance with the new rule. This may involve reviewing and updating cancellation processes to meet FTC requirements, developing clear communication strategies and potentially adjusting customer retention strategies.

The rule’s impact on customer retention is a key concern. However, while it may limit personalized retention deals, businesses can still implement proactive measures to reduce cancellations, such as improving customer service, offering flexible billing options and providing clear information about subscription terms.

2024 was a rough year for adult websites, and the “Click to Cancel” rule didn’t make things any easier. Understandably, many business operators are hoping for an NCTA victory eliminating the rule. In the meantime, consider speaking with your legal advisors so that you understand the full implications of noncompliance with this new regulation.

This article does not constitute legal advice and is provided for your information only and should not be relied upon in lieu of consultation with legal advisors in your own jurisdiction. It may not be current as the laws in this area change frequently. Transmission of the information contained in this article is not intended to create, and the receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver.

Corey D. Silverstein is the managing and founding member of Silverstein Legal. His practice focuses on representing all areas of the adult industry and his clientele includes hosting companies, affiliate programs, content producers, processors, designers, developers, operators and more. He is licensed in numerous jurisdictions including Michigan, Arizona, the District of Columbia, Georgia and New York. Contact him at MyAdultAttorney.com, corey@myadultattorney.com and (248) 290-0655.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

profile

Ricci Levy on Standing Up for the Right to Be Heard

When Ricci Levy speaks about human rights, she does not use detached, academic language. She speaks with urgency, emotion and the kind of passion that immediately makes it clear just how deeply personal this work is for her.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Lessons From Decades of Building the Adult Internet

After my first year of college, I needed a job. So I did what people did back then: I opened the newspaper and started scanning the classifieds. One listing stood out: “Image Librarian.” I had no idea what that meant, but I applied, and got the job.

Tanguy ·
opinion

How to Build a Cross-Border Payment Strategy

Pull up your analytics and you’ll likely find that international traffic is already on your site. Some of those visitors convert, but a lot more bounced at checkout — and a meaningful chunk tried to pay but were declined.

Joe Fredricks ·
opinion

The KPIs That Keep Payment Processing Humming While You're Away

I always look forward to the summer as my kids are home and I can plan little trips with them to reconnect and have some fun. If you’re like me, however, you probably never go on vacation without your laptop, so you can check in or lurk in the background to make sure all systems remain go.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

What Utah's SB 73 Means for Compliance Requirements

Utah has once again positioned itself at the center of the national battle over online age verification and adult-content regulation.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
profile

Clips4Sale's Christy on Backing Creators and Fueling Growth

Understanding the industry from within goes beyond data. For Christy, Manager of Creator Experience at Clips4Sale, that insight is shaped by front-line conversations and years spent listening not just to trends, but to people.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Breaking Down AI-Powered Moderation and Platform Safety

Adult platforms, including content sites, cam services and dating apps, consistently face a range of high-risk challenges. These include verifying consent, particularly for user-uploaded content, addressing nonconsensual material such as leaks and so-called revenge porn, and ensuring effective age verification and protection for minors. At the same time, platforms must manage content moderation at scale while addressing payment fraud, scams, harassment and user abuse.

Christoph Hermes ·
opinion

How to Optimize Subscription Billing for Compliance and Stability

The Federal Trade Commission’s “click to cancel” rule is coming back around. Last year, a federal appeals court vacated the FTC’s Negative Option Rule, aimed at addressing deceptive or unfair practices and making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Key Strategies for Streamlining Payment Processing Approval

Why is it taking so long to get my account approved? It's frustrating for everyone involved, but it's all part of the process. Over the past year, timelines have stretched to 60 days or more for merchants to complete onboarding, from internal compliance review to banking partner approval and final card brand registration.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

What to Know About Alabama's Regulatory Push on Adult Content

Over the past two years, Alabama has quietly but aggressively transformed itself into one of the most restrictive and unfriendly jurisdictions for the adult entertainment industry. Through the enactment of House Bill 164 and related enforcement mechanisms, the state has layered taxation, compliance burdens and content restrictions in a way that goes far beyond traditional regulation.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
Show More