Federal Appeals Court Vacates FTC 'Click to Cancel' Rule Pending Review

Federal Appeals Court Vacates FTC 'Click to Cancel' Rule Pending Review

ST. LOUIS — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit on Tuesday vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions, pending further review.

Critics contend that the rule exceeds the FTC’s authority and that its imposition skirted procedural rules. In the 8th Circuit’s decision, a three-judge panel concluded that the FTC failed to follow procedural requirements under the Federal Trade Commission Act. Tuesday's decision temporarily blocks enforcement of the rule, which was scheduled to take effect July 14.

As XBIZ reported last year, at issue are the FTC’s updates to the Negative Option Rule, originally adopted in the 1970s to protect consumers from being automatically enrolled in subscription plans without their consent. Under the updates, the rule would apply to almost all negative option programs, meaning any that “contain a term or condition that allows a seller to interpret a customer’s silence, or failure to take an affirmative action, as acceptance of an offer,” including automatic renewal and free-to-pay offers.

The FTC announced its proposed changes in March 2023. In response, the commission received more than 16,000 comments from consumers, government agencies, consumer groups and trade associations.

At the time, industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein cautioned website operators that while the proposed amendments would make it much easier for consumers to cancel unwanted subscriptions and would help protect them from deceptive practices, it could also potentially cause “major headaches for website operators” due to requiring substantial changes to sign-up and cancellation practices.

Silverstein provided a detailed breakdown of the rule for XBIZ readers earlier this year.

The case before the 8th Circuit consolidated multiple petitions for review brought by an array of businesses and trade associations in four federal circuit courts.

Although the court’s decision means that the rule’s provisions will not take effect pending further review, many operators that sell subscriptions already abide by similar rules, especially since both Visa and Mastercard regulations specify disclosure and consent requirements for negative options. There are also other existing relevant federal and state regulations. The Restore Online Shoppers Confidence Act, enacted by Congress in 2010, has been enforced against adult businesses, and in September 2024, California enacted a law significantly tightening rules regarding automatic renewal of paid website subscriptions.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

AV Bulletin: Midyear Roundup

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, more state age verification laws have been enacted around the United States, as well as proposed at the federal level and in other countries. Meanwhile, lawsuits resulting from AV laws have begun to play out in the courts. This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Judge Dismisses Last NCOSE-Backed Suit Over Kansas AV Law

A federal judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit alleging that adult site SuperPorn violated Kansas’ age verification law, citing lack of jurisdiction after similarly dismissing two related cases earlier this year.

ASACP Updates 'Restricted to Adults' Labeling Resource Page

The Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) has updated its Restricted to Adults (RTA) labeling resource page.

Federal AV Proposal Scores Minor Win in House but Remains in Doubt

A newly announced bipartisan agreement in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce may soon bring a proposed federal age verification law before the full House, but the measure continues to face an uphill battle.

Arizona Governor Vetoes 'Protect Act' With New Consent Provisions

Arizona Governor Kate Hobbs on Friday vetoed HB 2133, the “Protect Act,” which would have imposed new requirements for adult content uploaded online.

Brazil Begins Monitoring 18 Adult Sites for AV Compliance

Brazil’s National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) is now monitoring 18 high-traffic adult websites for compliance with the country’s Digital Statute for Children and Adolescents (Digital ECA), which requires such sites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Ofcom Fines First Time Videos $100,000 for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Thursday imposed a fine of 80,000 pounds (more than $100,000) against First Time Videos, which operates FTVGirls.com and FTVMilfs.com, for failing to implement age checks required for compliance with the Online Safety Act.

Curves Ahead: How BBW Creators are Turning Differentiation Into Competitive Advantage

For centuries, curves have been celebrated as a symbol of beauty, sensuality and power. From the soft opulence of Rubens paintings to the glamorous silhouettes of pinup icons, fuller figures have long occupied a place in art, fashion and fantasy.

Woodhull Freedom Foundation to Host Virtual 'Pride' Edition of 'Fact Checked' Series

Woodhull Freedom Foundation is hosting a Pride Month virtual edition of its series “Fact Checked by Woodhull.”

'InMelanin' Relaunches Through PAYSITE

InMelanin.com has officially relaunched through PAYSITE.

Show More