opinion

The Search for Perfection in Your Payments Page

The Search for Perfection in Your Payments Page

There has been a lot of talk about changes to cross sales and checkout pages. You have likely noticed that acquirers are now actively pushing back on allowing merchants to offer a negative option, upsell or any cross sales on payment pages. In fact, our U.S. acquirers and many of our EU acquirers are no longer supporting these types of additional sales. Even if we present a merchant with an existing biller’s payment form and a negative option or an opt-out cross sale on a payment page, the bank will reject or decline the account.

Many of you have experienced this too and have reached out for advice, so this month, I want to share more about negative options, why they are now being rejected and where we go from here.

Without banking support, we all must modify our payment pages to make up the revenue.

What is a Negative Option?

Let’s start at the beginning. A negative option is an offer in which a term or condition on a payment form, or elsewhere on the website, allows a seller to interpret a customer’s silence, or failure to take an affirmative action, as acceptance of an offer. A negative option can also occur after a trial period, such as when sellers automatically begin charging a fee or a higher fee unless consumers proactively cancel or return the goods or services. In addition, some negative option offers include upsell or bundled offers. In our industry, we tend to call negative option offers “opt-out cross sales.” This is where an additional offer on the payment page has a prechecked cross sale.

Why the Rejection?

As the Bob Dylan song goes, “The Times They are a-Changin’.” Our U.S. acquirers are now rejecting opt-out cross sales or negative options on payment pages due to regulatory concerns, which are largely driven by consumer protection legislation, pressure from the card brands to lower dispute rates, and the threat of legal action. Banks need to mitigate their risk just as much as we payment processors do, especially since once you attract the attention of a regulator or card brand, they may keep digging and cause further disruption.

Guidelines to Follow

In the United States, the mission of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is to protect consumers from unfair business practices and methods of competition. The FTC is now conducting enforcement against negative option offers under the Restore Online Shoppers Confidence Act (ROSCA), which was enacted by Congress in 2010. ROSCA prohibits charging or attempting to charge consumers for goods or services sold on the internet through any negative option feature, unless the marketer:

  • Clearly and conspicuously discloses all material terms of the transaction before obtaining the consumer’s billing information.
  • Obtains a consumer’s express informed consent before charging the consumer’s account; the offer cannot be pre-checked.
  • Provides a simple mechanism for consumers to stop recurring charges.

It is not just the FTC that has guidelines on negative options. There is also federal and state-level legislation, and the card brands make their stance clear as well.

Visa requires:

  • The name of the upselling merchant.
  • That the merchant offers the services in a clearly identified manner.
  • A description of the goods and services.
  • The length of any trial period or promotional period.
  • Clear disclosure that the cardholder will be charged unless they take steps to cancel their subscription.
  • The transaction amount.
  • For negative options: The information above must be clearly visible. At the time of the first transaction, the merchants must obtain express cardholder consent for any subsequent transactions; express consent must be obtained via a “click to accept” button on the checkout screen.

Mastercard has very similar requirements:

  • The merchant must disclose the subscription terms simultaneously with a request for card credentials.
  • The disclosure must include the price that will be billed and the frequency of the billing.
  • Merchants offering a negative-option billing model must also disclose the terms of the trial, including initial charges, the length of the trial period and the price and frequency of the subsequent subscription.
  • Merchants must clearly display the subscription terms on any payment and order summary webpages.
  • A merchant must capture a cardholder’s affirmative acceptance, which cannot be prechecked, of the subscription terms before completing the subscription order.

Need for New Forward Thinking

With banking partners no longer supporting negative option/cross sales due to regulatory and card brand pressure, it is time as an industry that we start to think of new ways to maintain the additional revenue earned from negative option offers.

As many in the industry are aware, during the second quarter of this year, Visa basically shut down the adult dating/dating vertical, which relied heavily on affiliate marketing — which in many cases was deceptive — as well as on cross-sale revenue, in order to be profitable. Accounts were flagged with deceptive marketing and/or transaction laundering, high dispute rates, and were threatened with substantial fines. This demonstrates that Visa is keeping a close eye on our space and will step in if they believe merchants are not treating consumers with the best care.

Without banking support, we all must modify our payment pages to make up the revenue. Over the last year, we have been working with a handful of merchants to come up with some compliant options to keep similar revenue flowing. We have seen great results with a compliant payment page that allows for an upsell. The compliant payment page has been able to help generate revenue comparable to negative options. To date, we have run A/B tests and have had success.

While this sounds like another miserable compliance request, in the long haul it is imperative that we tackle this negative option offer issue before we are forced to do so via lawsuits, fines or card brand enforcement. Remember, the biggest obstacles often present the greatest opportunity.

Cathy Beardsley is president and CEO of Segpay, a merchant services provider offering a wide range of custom financial solutions including payment facilitator, direct merchant accounts and secure gateway services. Under her direction, Segpay has become one of four companies approved by Visa to operate as a high-risk internet payment services provider. Segpay offers secure turnkey solutions to accept online payments, with a guarantee that funds are kept safe and protected with its proprietary Fraud Mitigation System and customer service and support. For any questions or help, contact sales@segpay.com or compliance@segpay.com.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

What Mastercard's Scam Monitoring Program Means for Adult Merchants

Mastercard's Scam Merchant Monitoring Program (SMMP) has introduced a new, investigation-led framework that works very differently from the ratio-based chargeback programs the industry has relied on for years. It applies to card-not-present merchants globally, and Mastercard's guidance on business models warranting closer attention includes adult content and dating platforms, along with subscription services, digital goods and forex.

Len Garcia ·
opinion

Why the Right Merchant Category Code Matters for NSFW AI Businesses

You explained exactly what your NSFW AI business does to your payment processor and they seemed to get it. The underwriting process felt thorough and exhausting, but it was well worth it because you began processing.

Jonathan Corona ·
trends

How Local Payments Can Expand Access and Reduce Friction at Checkout

Global adult platforms often enter new markets with a familiar assumption: If their checkout accepts major cards, they're ready for local customers. In reality, payment habits vary widely by country. Dutch consumers use iDEAL for online shopping, BLIK is a leading e-commerce payment method in Poland, and India's UPI handles billions of transactions each month.

Mitch Platt ·
opinion

How Detailed Receipts Build Consumer Trust and Reduce Chargeback

When was the last time you bought something online? Chances are you looked for the confirmation almost immediately. Did the transaction go through? Does it show what you bought? Were you charged correctly? And if there's a problem, who can you contact?

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

What Adult Platforms Should Know About the EU AI Act

The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act is now largely in force, creating new obligations for adult platforms using AI for content creation, performer verification, age estimation, moderation and other functions.

Corey Silverstein ·
opinion

How Native Spanish Speakers Help Pleasure Brands Expand Across Latin America

Latin America's Spanish-speaking markets represent an exciting growth opportunity for the pleasure products industry. Across the region, conversations about sexual wellness are becoming more open, specialty retailers are expanding their assortments and shoppers are seeking products that reflect their lifestyles and values.

Rin Musick ·
opinion

Why Retail Expertise Is Essential When AI Tools Analyze Store Data

Somewhere in one of our stores, someone scanned a barcode into a quantity field. The number entered was 8,388,607. At $19.99 per unit, that made a single line item worth roughly $167 million. The number was so large that the import failed immediately.

Zondre Watson ·
profile

Vendo CEO Mitch Platt Reflects on 20 Years of Lessons and Evolution

More than 20 years ago, three entrepreneurs in Barcelona began gathering over beers to pitch, dissect and routinely destroy one another's business ideas. The ritual was simple: One person arrived with a concept, while the other two tried to expose every weakness. Any proposal that survived earned another look. Most did not.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

How to Avoid the Hidden Risks of AI-Generated Legal Documents

Artificial intelligence can write a contract in seconds, but that does not mean it can write the contract your business actually needs. Across the adult industry, operators, creators and producers are increasingly using generative AI to prepare model releases, performer agreements, privacy policies, takedown notices, employment documents and responses to regulators. The appeal is obvious: Legal work is expensive, AI is fast and the resulting document often looks impressively professional. That polished appearance is exactly what makes the practice dangerous.

Corey Silverstein ·
opinion

How Rolling Reserves Affect Cash Flow and Merchant Stability

You log in to your payment processor’s dashboard, discover they are withholding 10% of your sales, and immediately assume something has gone wrong. In reality, everything is working exactly as intended.

Jonathan Corona ·
Show More