Walters: Some Aspects of Calif.'s SB 255 Go Too Far

SACRAMENTO — Both the state Senate and Assembly passed SB 255 this week, possibly giving California law enforcement officials their first tool to battle so-called “revenge porn."

Gov. Jerry Brown has 30 days to sign the bill into law. If signed, SB 255 would take effect immediately.

SB 255, introduced by state Sen. Anthony Cannella, would amend a section of the Penal Code and make it a crime to "cause serious emotional distress" to others by distributing over the Internet nude or semi-nude images of them.

Images in violation, as defined by the bill, would include portions of genitals and, in the case of a female, portions of breasts below the top of the areola, that is either "uncovered or visible through less than fully opaque clothing."

SB 255 would punish convicted operators with six-month jail sentences and imposing fines of $1,000 — even if the pictures were originally taken with consent.  Subsequent fines would amount to penalties not exceeding $2,000, along with one-year jail sentences.

The bill would prohibit only images taken by the person posting them, meaning that self-photos aren’t protected.

XBIZ asked adult entertainment attorney Lawrence Walters of the Walters Law Group on Friday to discuss the piece of legislation's ramifications, particularly for online adult operators.

XBIZ: Larry, what's your take on California's legislation to curb revenge porn?

LARRY WALTERS:  It goes without saying that the activity of ‘revenge porn’ is reprehensible and slimy. The perpetrators should face legal consequences.

But SB 255 goes too far in some ways, and is oddly inadequate in others. Initially, I have a fundamental concern with criminalizing the publication of material that is still considered protected speech. The agreement to maintain the privacy of intimate photographs does not take those images outside the realm of First Amendment protection. Imposing jail time against those who record and publish such images seems counter to free speech principles, and somewhat of an over-reaction to the problem.

A better solution may have been to create a private civil cause of action against those who released such private photos, along with statutory damages and attorneys fees. Injunctions could also be available against the publishers of material found to violate the state. There would be no shortage of California attorneys coming to the rescue of ex-girlfriends (and boyfriends) who have been victimized by this conduct, so long as there was a financial incentive to do so.

 A crushing financial judgment would be sufficient punishment in these cases, without slicing off another piece of content that would otherwise be protected by the First Amendment, and putting it in the criminal realm. The state of Florida rejected a similar revenge porn proposal last term, after serious constitutional questions were raised about the proposed statute’s validity. 

XBIZ: How about self-photos? The bill was changed by lawmakers in the last hours to not protect those types of pictures.

WALTERS: While the bill seeks to severely punish those who record and release intimate moments, it does nothing to address the more common phenomena of "selfies";  i.e., pictures taken by one’s self, with one’s own camera. The California bill requires that the perpetrator also be the photographer. The same injustice is done to a victim who’s private photo is released by an ex-boyfriend who received a self-produced, erotic "gift" before the relationship soured.  Under SB 255, those victims appear to be out of luck.

XBIZ: How about other concerns with the bill?

WALTERS: The final concern with the bill relates to its potential application of the criminal penalties to online service providers or websites that might ultimately distribute these pictures uploaded by users, without any knowledge that they were made public without necessary consent. There is no realistic way that a website operator could determine whether each erotic image provided by a user was accompanied by the necessary level of approval or consent by the person(s) depicted.  Section 230 and DMCA safe harbor specifically recognize that such burden would be unreasonable.

However, given the potential for application of accomplice liability theories, such as "aiding and abetting" or "conspiracy," an online service provider could theoretically get dragged into a criminal prosecution under this new bill, as a party who substantially assisted in the publication of the image, or who formed an agreement to publish the image.  Exemptions should be built into any law like this, protecting unwitting website operators who merely provide web space for users to upload material of their choosing. Both the First Amendment and the policies underlying Section 230 immunity require this sort of exemption.

View SB 255 (amended Sept. 3)

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FansRevenue Acquires DivaTraffic

FansRevenue has acquired web traffic service DivaTraffic.

AEBN Announces Peter Green as Top Male Boy/Girl Performer for Summer 2025

AEBN has revealed its top 10 male Boy/Girl performers for summer 2025, with Peter Green landing atop the leaderboard.

Spicey AI Relaunches Site, Debuts $Spicey Tokens

Interactive voice chat platform Spicey AI has relaunched its website and introduced $Spicey tokens.

FSC: Missouri Age Verification Rule Will Not Take Effect August 30

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) announced that Missouri's proposed age verification legislation will not take effect on August 30, as it had originally estimated.

Little Caprice, Marcello Bravo to Co-Host 2025 XMA Europa Awards

XBIZ is pleased to announce that husband-and-wife duo Little Caprice and Marcello Bravo will co-host adult’s biggest night in Europe: the 2025 XMA Europa Awards on Sept. 4, in the epic climax to XBIZ’s fall events series.

Germany Will Block Payments to AV-Noncompliant Adult Sites as of Dec. 1

Starting Dec. 1, Germany will implement new rules prohibiting financial institutions from providing payment services to adult sites deemed to have inadequate age verification systems and making it easier for the government to target websites mirroring the content of such sites.

Jerkmate Joins Pineapple Support as Partner-Level Sponsor

Jerkmate has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

FSC Launches Age Verification Toolkit for Adult Websites

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) announced today that it has launched a comprehensive toolkit to help adult websites navigate age verification laws.

Romero Mr. Alien to Present XBIZ Talk at Amsterdam Conference

XBIZ is pleased to announce that noted producer/director Romero Mr. Alien, the impresario of the XMAs award-winning studio Hentaied, will present an exclusive talk at next month’s Amsterdam conference.

New Fansly Analytics Platform 'SlyKiwi' Launches

SlyKiwi, a new analytics platform exclusively designed for Fansly content, has officially launched.

Show More