educational

Return of the Gold Rush?

Need (or want) a new domain name? Thousands of 'dot info' domain names are about to join the millions of once-registered 'dot com' names, as well as all of the previously unregistered 'dot biz,' names, plus a veritable alphabet soup of other domains, with extensions like .cc, .tv, and .us:

I read an article this morning at Wired.com that now has me thinking about the current state of domain names. The article was called "Dot-Com Still the Main Domain " and in it, Joanna Glasner described the relatively slow acceptance of the new 'dot-biz' and 'dot-info' domains; many of which are not really 'live' addresses, and those that are often contain no actual, original content, but are in fact used by established businesses and Trademark holders to protect their intellectual property and other interests from 'cyber squatters' and other online extortionists. And speaking of these digital opportunists, it appears that they will be forfeiting approximately 15,000 'dot info' domain names containing commonly used terms that were originally registered with improper or fraudulent Trademark claims. Look for these domains to be re-released in June.

But even with an impending re-release of 'choice' domain names, should we be rushing out to acquire some of these new online properties? In an era where the bloated inventories of many domain speculators are now returning to the 'available' listings after languishing unsold in some dreamer's portfolio, should Webmasters be stockpiling names in the often false assumption that they might be worth more than their registration fee?

What's In A Name?
The "value" of domain names is highly overstated. For example, "Spot.cc" used to run radio ads' promoting domain speculation, claiming: "business.com sold for over 7 million dollars! Buy your domain name before they're all gone!" Their web site stated ".CC is the new rage! .CC Domain names are a valuable asset. People who registered easy to remember .com names early have sold them for thousands (in some cases millions) of dollars. The value of .CC domains increases everyday." As if a .cc domain has any real value...

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not putting down the company promoting this product, nor the wonderful CoCos Islands that are the "CC" in "dot CC" — in fact, one of my dream vacations is to dive CoCos and enjoy their massive schools of Hammerhead Sharks. It is just every community who wants one can set up their own dot whatever, making this a never ending cycle of domain name availability, driven by the false hope that these names can be later resold for a profit.

What people miss in the fog of perceived profits or false security is that besides .cc, there are well over a hundred "dot whatever" extensions out there today. In my opinion, it is a waste of time and money to chase them; either out of "greed" (someday this will be worth something!) or "fear" (I better register my name before somebody else gets it!). Now a good " dot com" will always demand value - and respect - because it will be seen as an "established" online business. That being said, are all "dot coms" valuable? Of course not!

"business.com," "flowers.com," "weather.com," "golf.com" etc. will always have "value" because they are single word domain names with broad, generic appeal. What they have, in addition to being easy to spell and remember, is tremendous "type-in" value. Let me illustrate with a brief personal story; it's Mother's Day, and I want to send mom some flowers. I DON'T know whom I'll be dealing with, but I figure that if they're smart enough to own "flowers.com" they would get a nice bouquet to mom on time. I type in "flowers.com" and BOOM! Lucky guess! I could order flowers online and send them to mom. [The fact that it would have been EASIER to do so by CALLING 1 (800) flowers is a whole other story mitigated by the fact that I could "see" the sample bouquet online rather than "imagining" it from a telephone operator's verbal description.]

So, a name has value because of its generic appeal. What else instills value in a domain name? Having a highly identifiable brand name for one thing. I will not get into trademark disputes, or whether or not a person named "Sam Adams" has more right to the domain "samadams.com" than does a beer maker, but as a consumer, I expect that if I type in "www.samadams.com" I will visit the brewer's home page. Does the domain name samadams.com then have intrinsic value? You bet! Branding is one of the key values, and best uses, of a good domain name.

What else could make a domain name valuable to someone? I have personally found that a domain name can have value for "emotional reasons." Here's another personal story: I built an AVS site called PORNWORKS. The domain pornworks.com was already taken, so I settled for the next best thing: porn-works.com. I was happy, but not quite satisfied. I knew that porn-works had almost no type-in value, and that anyone who did not bookmark my site, but whom was trying to return "from memory," would miss the hyphen. Thus, pornworks.com would benefit from my marketing of porn-works.com. I don't care about .net or .org, either. If a surfer doesn't enter my site through a link, he'll type in the URL, and he'll end it with dot com.

Was this really a big deal? No. Most of my traffic came from search engines. The few who might try to visit by typing in my URL and missing the hyphen were negligible. However, I wanted to have pornworks.com — it was better than porn-works.com, and well, I wanted it!

For branding and personal (emotional) reasons, pornworks.com was worth up to $2,500 to me. The owner of this domain briefly had a site up, and although I wanted to contact him and offer to buy the domain from him, my "little voice" told me to be patient. Every month I ran a WHOIS search on pornworks.com until one day, it was available! The domain name that was worth up to $2,500 to me wasn't worth the $35 renewal fee to the previous owner. Consider this carefully.

So what then is a domain name worth? It is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Only someone willing to buy it can tell you the amount. If you want to see what the market will bear, list your domain for sale on ebay. There are also quite a few places that specialize in domain names for sale. Visiting these sites can be entertaining; look at some of the names, and some of the "asking" prices... Should you then purchase domain names on speculation that they will be worth more to someone else? Not anymore, all the good dot com names are gone, and before I paid you "big bucks" for a "good" dot CC, I'd register it as a dot biz, dot info, or something else with marginal (at best) type-in value.

Think I'm crazy? Then visit https://www.whois.net and do a "Deleted Domain Search." Here you will find an endless list of domain names (7,901,225 of them as of today!) that were once registered, but are now available. Most of these names someone bought thinking they would be a great investment, only to discover that they weren't worth the $35 renewal fee... I don't care about .net or .org, either. If a surfer doesn't enter my site through a link, he'll type in the URL, and he'll end it with dot com. If someone takes those other domains and builds the brand, that's fine, I'm the one who benefits, because in the end, the surfer will only remember Porn Works — and then end it with a dot com!

With all of this in mind, unless I was interested in working the search engines with some keyword saturated domain names like 'free-teen-porn.biz' or some such, or had a compelling need for a '.biz' '.info' or any other extension to support a targeted marketing effort, I would find little reason to register such a domain. Still, there is no doubt that whenever any new extensions become available (or re-available) that there will be a market for them — even if it only lasts a short while until the 'domain dujour' rush subsides:

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

Outlook 2026: Industry Execs Weigh In on Strategy, Monetization and Risk

The adult industry enters 2026 at a moment of concentrated change. Over the past year, the sector’s evolution has accelerated. Creators have become full-scale businesses, managing branding, compliance, distribution and community under intensifying competition. Studios and platforms are refining production and business models in response to pressures ranging from regulatory mandates to shifting consumer preferences.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

How Platforms Can Tap AI to Moderate Content at Scale

Every day, billions of posts, images and videos are uploaded to platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X. As social media has grown, so has the amount of content that must be reviewed — including hate speech, misinformation, deepfakes, violent material and coordinated manipulation campaigns.

Christoph Hermes ·
opinion

What DSA and GDPR Enforcement Means for Adult Platforms

Adult platforms have never been more visible to regulators than they are right now. For years, the industry operated in a gray zone: enormous traffic, massive data volume and minimal oversight. Those days are over.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Making the Case for Network Tokens in Recurring Billing

A declined transaction isn’t just a technical error; it’s lost revenue you fought hard to earn. But here’s some good news for adult merchants: The same technology that helps the world’s largest subscription services smoothly process millions of monthly subscriptions is now available to you as well.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Navigating Age Verification Laws Without Disrupting Revenue

With age verification laws now firmly in place across multiple markets, merchants are asking practical questions: How is this affecting traffic? What happens during onboarding? Which approaches are proving workable in real payment flows?

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

How Adult Businesses Can Navigate Global Compliance Demands

The internet has made the world feel small. Case in point: Adult websites based in the U.S. are now getting letters from regulators demanding compliance with foreign laws, even if they don’t operate in those countries. Meanwhile, some U.S. website operators dealing with the patchwork of state-level age verification laws have considered incorporating offshore in the hopes of avoiding these new obligations — but even operators with no physical presence in the U.S. have been sued or threatened with claims for not following state AV laws.

Larry Walters ·
opinion

Top Tips for Bulletproof Creator Management Contracts

The creator management business is booming. Every week, it seems, a new agency emerges, promising to turn creators into stars, automate their fan interactions or triple their revenue through “secret” social strategies. The reality? Many of these agencies are operating with contracts that wouldn’t survive a single serious dispute — if they even have contracts at all.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Building Sustainable Revenue Without Opt-Out Cross-Sales

Over the past year, we’ve seen growing pushback from acquirers on merchants using opt-out cross-sales — also known as negative option offers. This has been especially noticeable in the U.S. In fact, one of our acquirers now declines new merchants during onboarding if an opt-out flow is detected. Existing merchants submitting new URLs with opt-out cross-sales are being asked to remove them.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

How to Handle Payment Disputes Without Sacrificing Trust

You can run the best-managed and most compliant website out there, but that still doesn’t completely shield you from the risks tied to payment disputes. Buyer’s remorse, an unclear billing description or even a simple misunderstanding can lead a customer to dispute a transaction. Accumulate enough disputes, and both your reputation and revenue could be at risk.

Jonathan Corona ·
profile

WIA Profile: Taylor Moore

With a 70-person team and a growing slate of tools for content creators, the Teasy Agency has developed a reputation for putting talent first. That commitment owes a lot to co-founder Taylor Moore’s own experiences as a cam model.

Jackie Backman ·
Show More