AV Bulletin: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

AV Bulletin: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton. 

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Michigan Introduces AV Legislation

On Thursday, Michigan became the latest state to put itself on the AV map as Republican state Sen. Thomas A. Albert introduced SB 191, the “Material Harmful to Minors Regulation Act.” The bill gives enforcement authority to Michigan’s attorney general, who would be required to give violating sites 45 days’ notice and the opportunity to comply before initiating a civil action seeking damages of up to $10,000.00 per violation. 

The bill covers sites on which more than 33.33% of the total material is deemed harmful to minors. That rule has appeared consistently in AV bills around the country, but has raised questions in the media, the courts and in state houses about what metrics would actually be used to determine that material harmful to minors constitutes one-third of a website’s contents, since the provisions could be interpreted to refer to anything from number of videos to file size or content hours.

The bill has been referred to the Michigan Senate’s Regulatory Affairs Committee.

Bills Making the Rounds

Here is a list of other AV legislation currently making its way through state legislatures, which has seen action in the past week:

Wisconsin: AB 105 and companion bill SB 130 were introduced March 10 and have been making their way through committees and the amendment process. This legislation would be enforced via private lawsuits — the “bounty law” approach, which some states are relying upon in order to avoid litigation against the state or attorney general’s office — and would require websites to block VPN traffic. This latter provision is clearly a response to frequent criticisms of site-based AV as ineffective due to easy workarounds such as VPNs.

West Virginia: HB 2689, enforceable via private lawsuits with violators also subject to civil fines, is awaiting a hearing in the state’s House Judiciary Committee.

Arizona: HB 2112, enforceable via private lawsuits, has passed the state House as well as the state Senate’s majority and minority caucuses, putting it on track for likely approval.

Numerous other bills, introduced earlier in the legislative session, are sitting on committee agendas awaiting action. Free Speech Coalition maintains and updates a list of pending AV legislation here.

Commentary: When Bills Make No Sense — Literally

Age verification laws often spark debate over their intent and outcomes. Nominally intended to prevent minors from accessing adult content, in practice they often have the effect of stifling adult access to porn and chilling legally protected speech. Less frequently discussed, however, is the frequent clumsiness, ignorance and seeming incompetence in how these bills are being drafted and debated. 

As XBIZ reported last week, Wyoming recently enacted an AV law whose definition of “material harmful to minors” is “any picture, image, graphic image file, film, videotape or other visual depiction that is obscene or is child pornography.” By requiring age verification for viewing material that is already illegal, the laws seems to be conflating legal and illegal content. 

Meanwhile, an age verification bill that passed the Iowa state House this week does not even mention "material harmful to minors," which has become the standard terminology used in AV legislation. Instead, it cites "obscene material" as requiring age verification for viewing. This reflects confusion over the difference between obscenity and legal pornography.

That confusion has been further exacerbated as many state AV bills and laws have defined “harmful to minors” by incorporating legal language traditionally used to define “obscenity.”   

The phrasing in the Iowa bill and the Wyoming law could ultimately prevent them from applying to the adult sites at which they are aimed, though Free Speech Coalition has warned sites against making any such assumption.

Meanwhile, Florida lawmakers recently introduced legislation to require manufacturers to equip tablets and smartphones with a default “porn filter.” Confusingly, HB 1503 and its identical companion bill, SB 1718, do not require that users with device passwords be given an opportunity to disable the filter entirely — though they do prohibit users without passwords from doing so. In addition, the bills appear to equate “a user with a password” with an adult supervising a minor’s device use, though strangely this is never specified.

Throughout the past few years since Louisiana sparked the AV trend by passing the first such state law, debates in state legislatures across the country have included exchanges and commentary reflecting a very limited understanding of the technical, privacy and free speech aspects of age verification. State lawmakers stumble over terms and concepts such as “virtual private network” and “strict scrutiny” in gaffs sometimes reminiscent of former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens’ infamous and frequently mocked 2006 description of the internet as a “series of tubes.”

This calls into question not just lawmakers' intent — many have openly admitted that they hope AV laws prevent not just minors but adults from viewing porn — but also their basic competence to legislate such a complex issue.

Watch XBIZ.com for future Age Verification Bulletin roundups.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Strike 3 Holdings Sues Meta for Pirating Vixen Media Group Content to Train AI

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings filed suit in federal court this week, accusing Facebook parent company Meta of copyright infringement and alleging that Meta has extensively pirated VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pineapple Support, Streamate to Host 'Navigating Grief and Loss' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Streamate are hosting a free online support group to help performers cope with grief and loss.

Friday is Final AV Compliance Deadline in UK

Friday, July 25 marks U.K. media regulator Ofcom’s deadline for user-to-user services such as tube, cam and fan sites to implement its requisite “highly effective age assurance” measures for preventing minors from viewing adult content.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for May, June

AEBN has released the top search terms for the months of May and June from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Two Texas Bills Restricting Sex Toy Sales Fail to Pass

Two bills aimed at restricting sales of sex toys have failed to pass the Texas state legislature during its 2025 session.

NYC Adult Stores Petition for Rehearing in Zoning Law Case

A group of adult businesses on Tuesday petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit to rehear a case involving a zoning law that could severely limit adult stores’ operations in New York City.

Ofcom Releases Transparency Reporting Guidelines

Ofcom, the U.K. media regulator, has made public its official guidance detailing how online service providers — including adult sites — will be required to publish annual transparency reports on their efforts to protect children from online harms.

New AV Rules Take Effect for Ireland-Based Sites

Ireland’s Online Safety Code came into force Monday, including a provision requiring adult sites headquartered in Ireland to implement age assurance measures beyond self-declaration.

XBIZ Amsterdam Calls on New Startups for 'Spotlight' Program

XBIZ is pleased to announce that its new “Startup Spotlight” programming will make its European premiere at XBIZ Amsterdam 2025, set to take place Sept. 2-5 at the Jakarta Hotel Amsterdam.

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

Show More