Lawyers for Red Rose File Motion to Dismiss Obscenity Charges

PITTSBURGH — Attorneys for Karen Fletcher, aka Red Rose, have filed a pretrial motion petitioning the court to dismiss the obscenity indictment against Fletcher for disseminating six allegedly obscene fictional stories on her website describing the torture and sexual abuse of children.

Fletcher counsel Lawrence G. Walters argues that obscenity laws are unconstitutional as applied to purely textual works.

“This case is a little unique,” Walters told XBIZ. “We don’t believe the content at issue here meets the threshold for obscene material, so we’re asking the court to look at this before trial. We must protect Fletcher’s 1st Amendment rights of free speech; her works have obvious literary value.”

In the motion obtained by XBIZ, Lawrence argues that text is fundamentally different than pictures, because people process text differently. The defense is prepared to offer testimony from expert witnesses to this effect.

At issue in this case are six allegedly obscene works that were available on Red-Rose-Stories.com only for paid members, of which Fletcher claims there were only 29.

“Since the site in question is a membership site, no one could ‘accidentally’ stumble upon these stories; anyone could have stopped reading them before they were offended and there were warnings on the page,” Walters said. “Red Rose’s readers sought out this kind of material.”

While textual works have been ruled to be obscene by the courts, they all come before the Miller vs. California ruling in 1973, which sets the definition of obscenity against community standards. Lawrence said the U.S. Supreme Court has not issued a definitive ruling on whether or not the written word can be judged obscene.

“…Over the past 34 years, the Government has never sought to prosecute speech composed exclusively from the written word,” Lawrence said in the motion. “The absence of any post-1973 prosecutions under the federal obscenity statutes involving non-pictorial works reflects a sea change in the manner in which American society…views obscenity in a non-visual context.

“Such glaring lack of text-only obscenity cases further reflects a demonstrative evolution in community standards throughout the country, with respect to literary works, and recognition of the inherent serious value contained in such works.”

Additionally, the defense has filed a motion to dismiss the charges based on strict scrutiny. In order to overcome the presumption that content-based regulations are invalid under the 1st Amendment, the content must survive a strict judicial review, which requires the government to demonstrate that the law (in this case, obscenity law) is narrowly tailored to promote a compelling government interest.

While the 1st Amendment does not protect obscene works, all works are presumed to be protected until a judge or jury finds them to be obscene. Walters argues that since the stories have not been formally judged to be obscene, they are presumed to be protected. Walters said the government has put the “cart before the horse.”

“The government has to show that there is a compelling government interest in the expression that they are trying to prohibit,” Walters said. “The burden is on them to prove that these solely textual ‘fantasy’ stories fall outside the realm of constitutional protection. The government has to justify the obscenity laws. This case urges them to take a fresh look.”

Lawrence said that the government will file a written response to the motion and the court will set oral arguments.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches by Country for August, September

AEBN has released the list of popular searches from its straight and gay theaters by country in August and September.

AV in Focus: A Guide to Unlocking Compliance With Clarity

The age verification era isn’t coming — it’s here. Laws are already on the books in numerous U.S. states, as well as in the U.K., France and beyond.

Canadian Privacy Commissioner Endorses National AV Bill

Philippe Dufresne, privacy commissioner of Canada, has voiced support for a bill that would impose fines of up to $500,000 on adult sites that do not implement age verification for Canadian viewers.

Ricky Johnson Launches 'Ricky's Resort' Through YourPaysitePartner

Ricky's Room studio honcho Ricky Johnson has launched his latest site, RickysResort.com, through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Industry Attorney Paul Cambria Retires After 50 Years of Practicing Law

After more than a half-century in practice, during which he provided the defense in some of the adult industry's most notable legal cases, attorney Paul Cambria has retired.

2026 XMA Nominations Party Set for Nov. 19 in Hollywood

The 2026 XMA nominations reveal party will take place at Keys on the Sunset Strip on Wednesday, Nov. 19, with red-carpet arrivals starting at 8 p.m.

New VR Membership Site 'DeepInSex.com' Launches

The new 8K VR membership site DeepInSex has officially launched.

NATS Launches Integrated Content Management System

Too Much Media (TMM) has rolled out an integrated, no-charge Content Management System (CMS) to its NATS platform.

AEBN Reveals Avery Lust as Top Trans Star for Q3 of 2025

AEBN has published its top trans stars list for the third quarter of 2025, with Avery Lust landing atop the leaderboard.

FSC: California's Device-Based AV Law Does Not Apply to Adult

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) put out an advisory today explaining that California's new device-based age verification law does not apply to adult websites.

Show More