Prenda Law Attorneys Found in Contempt, Ordered to Pay $65,000

CHICAGO — A federal judge in Chicago today found Prenda Law attorneys John Steele and Paul Hansmeier in contempt, ordering them to pay $65,000 for obstructing discovery proceedings in a case they filed on behalf of adult company Lightspeed Media Corp.

Today’s order for the sanctions does not include two other sanctions totaling $287,000 against the two attorneys in the same case.

U.S. District Judge Herndon, ordering Steele and Hansmeier to pay up the $65,000 in five weeks, said that Steele, along with Prenda Law attorney Paul Duffy, had “engaged in unreasonable, willful obstruction of discovery in bad faith.”

Now dissolved, Prenda Law for years had been prolific in exacting payments from porn piracy defendants through court-approved subpoenas.

The additional award of sanctions acted on Friday stemmed from a case against a man named Anthony Smith, who was alleged to have been the ringleader of a hacking gang involving 6,600 users who obtained stolen passwords to break into about 40 Lightspeed Media porn sites.

At the behest of Lightspeed Media, Prenda Law made additional claims against corporate executives at AT&T and Comcast Cable Communications that they aided, abetted and conspired with the hackers to steal content because they refused to comply with subpoenas and turn over subscriber data based on IP addresses.

Prenda Law later told the court in a motion that Lightspeed Media intended to drop the suit. That motion spurred Smith’s attorneys into action with requests for reimbursement of attorneys fees because the suit was based on "frivolous claims.”

As a result, the lower court ordered Prenda Law attorneys to pay sanctions for Smith ($72,000), AT&T ($120,000) and Comcast ($69,000).

After missing deadlines to pay the $261,000 in sanctions, a lower court ordered the firm to pay 10 percent more as a fine.

Prenda Law attorneys Duffy, Steele and Hansmeier later appealed; however, the 7th Circuit rejected their contention that the sanctions were not appropriate, as well as their appeal holding them in civil contempt and imposing the fine.

The new $65,000 in sanctions are a result of Smith’s attorney unearthing evidence that the Prenda Law attorneys made misrepresentations regarding their inability to pay the original sanctions of $261,000.

Herndon said that new evidence revealed by Smith’s attorneys showed that Duffy and Steele mislead subpoenaed banking institutions during discovery over the issue of the inability to pay.

Smith’s attorneys also provided the court with newly discovered financial evidence to support his assertion that, despite their pleas of insolvency, Steele and Hansmeier had sufficient assets to satisfy the sanctions, Herndon said.

“Specifically, Smith presents new information pertaining to Steele and Duffy’s communication with JP Morgan/Chase. This new information demonstrates that on Jan. 29, 2014, Steele informed JP Morgan he intended to file a motion to quash subpoenas issued by Smith requesting Lightspeed’s counsel’s financial records,” Herndon said in his order.

“The following day, Steele sent a copy of said motion to JP Morgan without a file stamp. Several days later, JP Morgan requested a file stamped copy from Duffy. Duffy finally supplied a file stamped copy of the motion to quash on March 3, 2014 — two weeks after the court had denied the motion and allowed discovery to proceed."

Herndon said that the court takes Duffy’s actions as “intentionally obstructive,” as he had reason to know the motion to quash had been denied at the time he relayed it to the bank.

The judge also pointed to new evidence that reveals that, in the two months before he filed his memorandum on Jan. 29, 2014, Steele deposited over $300,000 into a new bank account.

“Moreover, within a month of asking the court for leave to show his insolvency, Steele wrote checks totaling nearly $200,000, some of which were written to himself, for expenses related to home renovations. Between April and September of that year, Steele had deposits in that account totaling over $100,000,” the judge wrote.

“Further, on Nov. 12, 2014, Steele still pled insolvency. Yet, just one month later, he represented in his divorce proceeding that his assets approached $1.3 million.

“As to Hansmeier, Smith presents evidence that, in the years leading up to the judgment against him, Hansmeier had transferred nearly half a million dollars to a company called Monyet LLC,” the judge noted. 

View today's ruling

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

German Court: Regulator Can't Block Entire IG Accounts, Only Posts

A German court has ruled that while a regional media regulatory agency may block specific Instagram posts that include material deemed harmful to minors, it cannot ban an entire Instagram account due to such a post.

Brazil Lays Out Preliminary Guidelines for New AV Requirements

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Wednesday signed a decree establishing guidelines for new regulations requiring adult websites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Senate Committee Debates Section 230 Reform

The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing Wednesday on potential changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

Pearl Industry Network Offers Free Creator Memberships

Industry trade group Pearl Industry Network (PiN) has launched its free creator membership initiative.

Sam Bird Acquires Fanblast

Sam Bird, former co-director of global talent agency Surge, has acquired creator monetization tool Fanblast and named himself CEO.

'SheHerGirls' Launches Through Paysite.com

The braintrust behind PoleVixens has officially launched a new membership site, SheHerGirls, also through Paysite.com.

FTC Invites Public Comment on 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced this week that it is seeking public comment on whether it should amend its Negative Option Rule to better address deceptive or unfair practices.

Aylo Rebuts Indiana AV Suit Claims Over VPN Access

Aylo this week asked a Marion Superior Court judge to dismiss Indiana’s lawsuit alleging that the company violated the state’s age verification law by failing to prevent access by users who employ VPNs and similar means to avoid geolocation.

'PSMTickling' Launches Through Paysite.com

PSMTickling.com has officially launched through Paysite.com.

Show More