educational

Coping With Copyrights: 2

This article is the second in a multipart series of articles addressing what a webmaster should know about copyrights and copyright law. In last month's article, I discussed the very basics of copyrights, including the purpose of copyrights and the broad range of works that are protected by the copyright laws. In this article we'll cover the powerful rights provided by copyright law and basic copyright infringement.

U.S. Copyright Law Rights
Copyrights are a set of exclusive rights provided to a copyright owner by the United States government. Because the rights are exclusive, copyright ownership confers a kind of government-enforced monopoly upon the owner. This is the basic reason why copyrights can be so useful, so valuable and such a problem for infringers. Essentially, the copyright laws entitle a copyright owner to wield the "big stick" of the United States government to enforce the copyright owner's exclusive rights.

For example, if you own a work protected by copyright that is being infringed, to enforce your rights, copyright law entitles you to invoke the power of the United States federal court system and the law enforcement apparatus of the United States, including the U.S. Marshals, the Customs Service and, potentially, even the Justice Department.

So, what specifically are these "big stick" rights? Copyright law in the United States provides six separate rights to copyright owners:

  • The exclusive right to reproduce the copyrighted work. This means that only the copyright owner has the right to make copies of the work.
  • The exclusive right to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work. This includes the right, for example, to be the only party authorized to adapt a work, like a video or photograph, to a different medium, such as the Internet.
  • The exclusive right to distribute copies of the copyrighted work to the public.
  • The exclusive right to publicly perform certain types of copyrighted works (such as audiovisual works, including video clips).
  • The exclusive right to publicly perform sound recordings by digital audio transmission (e.g., via the Internet).
  • The exclusive right to publicly display copyrighted work.

These are all powerful rights, any of which, if infringed, could result in some very serious consequences for the infringer: direct and/or contributory copyright infringement.

So What Exactly Is Copyright Infringement?
A person or entity may be liable for damages to a copyright owner for copyright infringement if that person or entity exercises, without proper authorization, one or more of the exclusive copyrights reserved to the copyright owner. In such cases, the copyright owner can bring a lawsuit in federal court to obtain damages and enjoin the infringer's continued infringement of the copyright owner's work.

Let's look at a fairly common example of copyright infringement on the web. Suppose you own the copyrights in content, such as photographs, that you are distributing to members of your site pursuant to your site's terms and conditions ("T's & C's"). Suppose as well, that your T's & C's only grant a license to your members to use your site and the content available at your site for "educational or entertainment purposes only" and your license correspondingly prohibits your members from using your content for commercial purposes (note: your site's T's&C's should always contain this kind of prohibition). Now, further suppose a member, "Mr. X," is really another webmaster, and Mr. X copies content on your site and puts the content on his own membership site.

By doing so, Mr. X has exceeded the limits of the copyright license you granted to him in your T's & C's. Because of this, Mr. X has exercised, without proper authorization, several of your exclusive rights. First, he has infringed your exclusive right to make copies when he made an unauthorized copy of your content for his commercial site rather than for his own education or entertainment. Second, he infringed your exclusive right to distribute your content by distributing copies of the content without your authorization. Third, by including your content into his website, Mr. X also created a derivative work (i.e., his website, which is now partly composed of your content), thereby violating your exclusive right to make derivative works. In all three instances, Mr. X is a direct infringer of your copyrights in the content. This would entitle you to sue Mr. X in federal court and force him to stop distributing your content and to pay you money damages. This also means that you would be entitled to ask the court to force Mr. X to pay you all the profits you can prove he made from his improper exploitation of your content during the last three years.

Attorneys Fees
Additionally, under certain circumstances, you may be entitled to payment of your attorneys fees by Mr. X and to payment of "statutory damages" of up to $150,000 per work infringed regardless of whether Mr. X made any money unlawfully distributing your content. Yes, that's right, liability of up to $150,000 per work even if he never made a dime from your content. I will discuss statutory damages in greater detail in a subsequent article.

But continuing our example, Mr. X's infringement problems don't stop with his activities alone. By promoting would-be members to buy a membership in Mr. X's site so that they can download the site's content, including your content, Mr. X is also inducing further infringements by his members, who, by downloading your content, are also making additional unauthorized copies. These member-generated copies are also infringements. In such cases, Mr. X would be a "contributory infringer" with respect to the infringements of your content by his members. This can result in yet additional liability and additional awards of damages. In fact, it is not uncommon that damages resulting from contributory infringement can greatly exceed those resulting from an infringer's direct infringement.

Contributory Liability
Because the various online adult entertainment business models involve content promotion and distribution to numerous parties, including a site's affiliate webmasters, the potential for substantial contributory infringement liability is arguably greater on the web than for any other adult media. In fact, many adult webmasters have found themselves embroiled in copyright litigation as alleged contributory infringers either because of their participation in an affiliate program that has provided them with infringing materials or because one of their affiliates has generated traffic using infringing materials.

Because of the importance of these issues, and because "contributory liability" and the related concept of "vicarious liability" apply, not only to copyright infringement, but also to trademark and patent infringement, as well as to violations of criminal law.

Gregory A. Piccionelli is a senior partner at Piccionelli & Sarno, an Internet intellectual property and entertainment law firm located at 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2350, Los Angeles CA 90067. He can be reached at (310) 553-3375, or go to www.gregpiccionelli.com.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

profile

Ricci Levy on Standing Up for the Right to Be Heard

When Ricci Levy speaks about human rights, she does not use detached, academic language. She speaks with urgency, emotion and the kind of passion that immediately makes it clear just how deeply personal this work is for her.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Lessons From Decades of Building the Adult Internet

After my first year of college, I needed a job. So I did what people did back then: I opened the newspaper and started scanning the classifieds. One listing stood out: “Image Librarian.” I had no idea what that meant, but I applied, and got the job.

Tanguy ·
opinion

How to Build a Cross-Border Payment Strategy

Pull up your analytics and you’ll likely find that international traffic is already on your site. Some of those visitors convert, but a lot more bounced at checkout — and a meaningful chunk tried to pay but were declined.

Joe Fredricks ·
opinion

The KPIs That Keep Payment Processing Humming While You're Away

I always look forward to the summer as my kids are home and I can plan little trips with them to reconnect and have some fun. If you’re like me, however, you probably never go on vacation without your laptop, so you can check in or lurk in the background to make sure all systems remain go.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

What Utah's SB 73 Means for Compliance Requirements

Utah has once again positioned itself at the center of the national battle over online age verification and adult-content regulation.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
profile

Clips4Sale's Christy on Backing Creators and Fueling Growth

Understanding the industry from within goes beyond data. For Christy, Manager of Creator Experience at Clips4Sale, that insight is shaped by front-line conversations and years spent listening not just to trends, but to people.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Breaking Down AI-Powered Moderation and Platform Safety

Adult platforms, including content sites, cam services and dating apps, consistently face a range of high-risk challenges. These include verifying consent, particularly for user-uploaded content, addressing nonconsensual material such as leaks and so-called revenge porn, and ensuring effective age verification and protection for minors. At the same time, platforms must manage content moderation at scale while addressing payment fraud, scams, harassment and user abuse.

Christoph Hermes ·
opinion

How to Optimize Subscription Billing for Compliance and Stability

The Federal Trade Commission’s “click to cancel” rule is coming back around. Last year, a federal appeals court vacated the FTC’s Negative Option Rule, aimed at addressing deceptive or unfair practices and making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Key Strategies for Streamlining Payment Processing Approval

Why is it taking so long to get my account approved? It's frustrating for everyone involved, but it's all part of the process. Over the past year, timelines have stretched to 60 days or more for merchants to complete onboarding, from internal compliance review to banking partner approval and final card brand registration.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

What to Know About Alabama's Regulatory Push on Adult Content

Over the past two years, Alabama has quietly but aggressively transformed itself into one of the most restrictive and unfriendly jurisdictions for the adult entertainment industry. Through the enactment of House Bill 164 and related enforcement mechanisms, the state has layered taxation, compliance burdens and content restrictions in a way that goes far beyond traditional regulation.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
Show More