opinion

Dissecting the EU Directive's Onslaught Against Free Speech

Dissecting the EU Directive's Onslaught Against Free Speech

Now that Article 11 and 13 have passed in the EU Parliament, alarmists are arguing that the internet as we know it is about to die. Lobbyists have tried in vain for years to bring about draconian copyright reform with SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act), PIPA (Protect IP Act) and ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement), but the internet successfully stopped them at every turn. However, the powers that be are nothing if not persistent, and they kept trying until they eventually pushed through problematic new laws that will undermine free speech, online creativity and alternative news media and may even make most internet memes impossible.

The European Parliament recently rubber-stamped copyright reform with 348 votes in favor and 274 against. Years of counter-campaigning have proven futile, and in the end, the EU seems to have gotten what it wanted: a new means of controlling and censoring the web and the free passage of information. As a consequence, it also now has a mechanism for scrubbing populist and nationalist movements from the internet. Corporate lobbyists in the mainstream media (film, television, music and the video game industry) are celebrating. Any content they own can henceforth be removed on their say-so even if its usage previously fell under “Fair Use.”

Even the staunchest pro-EU supporter is going to have a hard time justifying their love for the EU if it plans to play catch-up with China in terms of censorship.

The film, TV and music industries have been unhappy with the internet since day one, and they've oddly failed to clamp down on piracy. Under the new EU copyright directive, they'll be granted complete control over every image, video and song they own. Article 13 allows/demands the identification of any material uploaded to social networks, before instantly monetizing it or removing it regardless as to whether that material is non-commercial. Content ID matching is set to become the norm. Spreading funny or satirical memes that make use of copyrighted imagery will be impossible. Hence the term “Meme Ban.”

Mainstream media wants more of the pie at the expense of the little guy. Article 13 requires social networks to filter every bit of content uploaded and cross-reference it with commercial rights holders’ databases. Article 11, on the other hand, is referred to as the “Link Tax.” Small blogs or alternative/independent media commentators running websites that link to a news story from a major publication will (at least in theory) have to pay a fee. The inclusion of text snippets from major news outlets in a fair use capacity will require a licensing charge. For critics of this development, an attack on the hyperlink is an attack on the very internet itself. Even individual social media users posting links to articles on Facebook or Twitter won't be able to do that without agreeing to pay these link taxes. Now, social networks may or may not agree to these fees, but it has been suggested that they will choose to cease operations in the EU because the cost will become prohibitively expensive. Small social networks like BitChute, Gab and Minds will be facing the same fees as the big players.

The idea of a flawless “Upload Filter” (Article 13) itself seems impractical and utopian. After all, we're talking about highly sophisticated machine learning systems able to trawl through an infinitely large database of material while accurately detecting what was original content and what belonged to a movie or music studio. The dizzying complexity of implementing such systems would be phenomenal, to say nothing about the expenses. Some argue that politically speaking, the European Union is the main beneficiary of the copyright directive but for different reasons. The EU itself is under threat and to a certain degree, it no longer wishes for its citizens to be able to question its rulings, policies and actions freely. Are we really steering towards an anti-democratic, bureaucratic Superstate that wishes to answer to no one? European mainstream media is predominantly pro-EU. It's the Euroskeptic alternative media who fear censorship, and this is where so-called “hate speech” legislation usually comes into play. Information is incredibly difficult to police because too many people have the ability not only to access dissenting viewpoints but to spread inconvenient truths far and wide across the web. Information is power, and the EU knows it.

The hate speech argument is wearing thin. The EU faces legitimate criticism about controlling media narrative and restricting what its citizens can say or see online. In a dystopian vision of the near future, the copyright directive could allow the EU to censor the internet, but it will no longer be under the guise of combating “hate speech” or “fake news.” Five million Europeans, spearheaded by leading internet technology experts and academics protested with petitions. Even the staunchest pro-EU supporter is going to have a hard time justifying their love for the EU if it plans to play catch-up with China in terms of censorship. Deplatforming, demonetizing and shutting down free speech not approved of by Big Media and the political establishment must never be considered viable options.

A recent statement from YouTube said that the final legislation which passed was "an improvement" from when it was first announced, but that the platform is indeed "concerned" that Article 13 could have "unintended consequences that may harm Europe's creative and digital economy." Hope remains for those who oppose the directives in that each EU member country has two years to peruse the legislation, then tweak and improve it before its implementation in their own country. It isn't clear what that means for the UK though, given that Brexit confusion rages on.

Jonathan Corona has 15 years of experience in the electronic payments industry. As MobiusPay’s EVP, Corona is primarily responsible for day-to-day operations as well as reviewing and advising merchants on a multitude of compliance standards set forth by the card associations. MobiusPay specializes in merchant accounts in the U.S., E.U. and Asia. Follow them @MobiusPay on Twitter, FB and IG.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

profile

Clips4Sale's Christy on Backing Creators and Fueling Growth

Understanding the industry from within goes beyond data. For Christy, Manager of Creator Experience at Clips4Sale, that insight is shaped by front-line conversations and years spent listening not just to trends, but to people.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Breaking Down AI-Powered Moderation and Platform Safety

Adult platforms, including content sites, cam services and dating apps, consistently face a range of high-risk challenges. These include verifying consent, particularly for user-uploaded content, addressing non-consensual material such as leaks and so-called revenge porn, and ensuring effective age verification and protection for minors.

Christoph Hermes ·
opinion

How to Optimize Subscription Billing for Compliance and Stability

The Federal Trade Commission’s “click to cancel” rule is coming back around. Last year, a federal appeals court vacated the FTC’s Negative Option Rule, aimed at addressing deceptive or unfair practices and making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Key Strategies for Streamlining Payment Processing Approval

Why is it taking so long to get my account approved? It's frustrating for everyone involved, but it's all part of the process. Over the past year, timelines have stretched to 60 days or more for merchants to complete onboarding, from internal compliance review to banking partner approval and final card brand registration.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

What to Know About Alabama's Regulatory Push on Adult Content

Over the past two years, Alabama has quietly but aggressively transformed itself into one of the most restrictive and unfriendly jurisdictions for the adult entertainment industry. Through the enactment of House Bill 164 and related enforcement mechanisms, the state has layered taxation, compliance burdens and content restrictions in a way that goes far beyond traditional regulation.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
profile

Chaturbate's Emely Zuniga Talks Show Floor Magic and Creator Care

During industry events, you’ll likely find Zuniga gliding through the room, greeting creators, checking details and making sure everyone around her feels taken care of. With her colorful red hair, perfectly done nails and an easygoing, “work bestie” demeanor that instantly puts people at ease, she thrives in the fast-paced environment of conferences and trade shows.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

What to Know About Deepfakes, Likeness Rights, and Digital Consent

AI is reshaping virtually every sector of the global economy, and the adult industry is no exception. Many adult companies have already explored or adopted AI in content production, and surveys indicate that around 65% have considered implementing AI technologies in their operations.

Christoph Hermes ·
opinion

Key Strategies for Adapting to Stricter PCI Compliance Standards

When it comes to PCI compliance, the days of simply filling out some paperwork and answering a few questions are gone. A casual approach is just not viable anymore.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

How to Maximize Value From Your Payment Processing Fees

Regulatory requirements are putting more and more pressure on the adult industry. To stay compliant, merchants need tools that help with content moderation, age verification and fraud solutions. Unfortunately, the fees for those tools are hitting merchants’ bottom lines — including fees charged by payment services providers.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

Understanding Sin Taxes and the Legal Roadblocks Ahead

As of this writing, a bill sits on the desk of Utah’s governor, awaiting his signature to make it state law. That bill includes a provision imposing an excise tax of 2% on adult sites operating in the state.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
Show More