opinion

A Look at ‘Morality Clauses’ in IP Laws Around the World

A Look at ‘Morality Clauses’ in IP Laws Around the World

If you’re in the adult industry, you’ve probably heard the recent big news of the U.S. Supreme Court striking down the ban on “immoral” and “scandalous” trademarks. This now unenforceable law is what is referred to as a “morality clause.” The decision is a big win in the U.S., but prohibitions still exist in the patent and trademark laws of many countries around the world.

The Paris convention is an international treaty adopted in 1883. It sets out rules that apply to patent, trademark and other forms of intellectual property (IP) law. The rules define processes such that nationals of one signatory country can get the benefit of IP protection in other signatory countries. Article 6B of the Paris Convention recites, in pertinent part:

Laws denying intellectual property protection based on morality make doing business difficult and uncertain in pleasure products and porn.

1. Trademarks covered by this Article may be neither denied registration nor invalidated except ... when they are contrary to morality or public order…

The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), effective as of 1995, is another international legal agreement — this one among the member nations of the World Trade Organization (WTO). It lays out minimum standards for the regulation by national governments of various types of IP as applied to nationals of other WTO member countries. Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement recites, in pertinent part:

2. Members may exclude from patentability inventions, the prevention within their territory of the commercial exploitation of which is necessary to protect public order or morality…

Accordingly, these international treaties allow governments to deny intellectual property protection to inventions (tech) and trademarks of an “immoral” nature.

Focusing our lens first on trademark law, as mentioned earlier, here in the U.S., until just a couple of months ago, there was a ban on registration of “scandalous” and “immoral” trademarks. In the case of Iancu v. Brunetti, the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) declined to issue Eric Brunetti a trademark registration for the term “FUCT,” as applied to an apparel line.

The decision in that case from the highest court in the land opened up a new landscape, allowing even sexually explicit marks to benefit from U.S. federal trademark registration.

Across the Atlantic Ocean, our friends in the European Union are still dealing with such laws. Article 7(1)(f) of the European Union Trade Mark Regulation provides that trademarks shall not be registered if they are “contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality.” In September of 2015, the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) denied a trademark registration for the name of one of the country's most successful movie franchises. Constantin Film Produktion GmbH had filed an application to register "Fack Ju Goehte" for a film and respective merchandise. The EUIPO Fifth Board of Appeal and the General Court upheld the decision that the mark is too similar to a “vulgar” English phrase.

The case is on appeal. At the time of submission of this article for publication, a decision has not yet been delivered. However, on July 2, Advocate General, Michal Bobek, issued an opinion (though non-binding) arguing that the court decisions to decline registration should be set aside and annulled. In the opinion, he stated, “… although it is not a primary goal of trade mark law, freedom of expression clearly remains present therein.” He went on to also note, “the protection of public policy and morality is certainly not the key or predominant role of EUIPO and E.U. trade mark law.” So, keep watch for a decision in this case — it could be a game changer in Europe.

Turning our lens now to patent law, in the U.S., though not included in a statute (i.e. black letter law), there existed a “Moral Utility Doctrine” from case law (court decisions). The Doctrine emanated from an 1817 court decision that stated that an invention could not be patented if it conflicted with the “sound morals of society.” The patents for vibrators in the early 1900s do not describe sexual uses. This exclusion may have been purposeful in light of the Doctrine. The USPTO and the courts relied on this doctrine through about 1980, when a series of cases moved away from this philosophy.

Today, questions under the morality clauses typically come up in relation in to genetic engineering and ethics. For example, should patents be allowed on human genes, or genetically modified animals? In my opinion, these questions seem like much more trying questions of ethics than whether women should be allowed to use dildos. Thankfully, in the U.S. and much of the developed world, we’ve come a long way. Accordingly, sex toys are not prohibited patent protection on moral grounds in a vast number of developed countries, including the U.S., E.U., Canada, Australia and others.

That is not the case everywhere though. A little more than a year ago, India’s law came under public scrutiny when it was reported that Standard Innovation, the maker of We-Vibe products (now part of WOW Tech Group), was denied a patent for its C-shaped vibrator by the India Patent Office. In India, Section 3(b) of The Patents Act, 1970 provides, in pertinent part:

The following are not inventions within the meaning of this Act, —

(b) an invention the primary or intended use or commercial exploitation of which could be contrary to public order or morality or which causes serious prejudice to human, animal or plant life…

The India Patent Office decided that the We-Vibe vibrator fell under this section of the law, and accordingly, was not entitled to a patent. The decision discussed that importing and selling sex toys in India is illegal as under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code, it is unlawful to sell or distribute “obscene” objects. “Obscene” is defined there as “[A] book, pamphlet, paper, writing, drawing, painting, representation, figure or any other object] … if it is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest.”

Even in light of these laws, Entrepreneur India reported that major players in the sex toy industry are moving into the market there. Laws denying intellectual property protection based on morality make doing business difficult and uncertain in pleasure products and porn. Brands must come up with a global patent and trademark strategy, which can be complicated by outdated laws relating to sex, obscenity and profanity. Hopefully, the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision will eventually be echoed around the world, and the upcoming E.U. decision is the perfect place to start.

Maxine Lynn is an intellectual property (IP) attorney with the law firm of Keohane & D’Alessandro, PLLC, having offices in Albany, New York. She focuses her practice on prosecution of patents for technology, trademarks for business brands, and copyrights for creative materials. Through her company, Unzipped Media, Inc., she publishes the “Unzipped: Sex, Tech & the Law” blog at SexTechLaw.com and the “Unzipped: The Business of Sex” podcast at BusinessOf.sex.

Disclaimer: The content of this article constitutes general information, and is not legal advice. If you would like legal advice from Maxine Lynn, an attorney-client relationship must be formed by signing a letter of engagement with her law firm. To inquire, visit Sextech.lawyer.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

Breaking Down HB 805 and How it Affects the Adult Industry

North Carolina House Bill 805 was enacted July 29, after the state legislature overrode Governor Josh Stein’s veto. The provisions that relate to the adult industry, imposing requirements for age verification, consent and content removal, are scheduled to become effective Dec. 1. Platforms have until then to update their policies and systems to comply with the new regulations.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
profile

Neon Coyotes Sets the Tone for Trendiness With Bespoke Leather Kink Wear

If your kink wear can’t readily make the leap from a dark BDSM dungeon to a sunny, mimosa-fueled brunch, you haven’t yet been initiated into the cult of the Neon Coyotes — fresh, leather kink wear brand transforming restraints into runway-ready art.

Colleen Godin ·
opinion

Why It's Time for Adult Retail to Embrace AI

In the late 1980s, I was working in the rental car business. My first company didn’t have a single computer. Everything — contracts, inventory, employee records — was done by hand. If you wanted a report, you dug through paper files and crunched numbers on a calculator. It was tedious, but it was all we knew.

Zondre Watson ·
opinion

How to Avoid Copyright Pitfalls When Using Music in Adult Content

When creating an adult video, bringing your vision to life often means assembling just the right ingredients — including the right music. However, adding music to adult content can raise complex legal and ethical issues.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
opinion

What Retailers Gain by Partnering With Family-Run Brands

In an age increasingly dominated by corporate consolidation and faceless supply chains, choosing to work with a family-owned and operated business can offer retailers a depth of value that goes far beyond pricing and product margins.

Briana Watkins ·
opinion

How the 'Back Massager' Vibrator Became the World's Most Versatile Sex Toy

Wand vibrators are once again having a pop culture moment. Recently, Harry Styles expanded his lifestyle brand, Pleasing, by introducing a “Pleasing Yourself” double-sided wand vibrator developed in collaboration with sex educator Zoë Ligon.

Naima Karp ·
opinion

Strategic Retail Buying in a Shifting Pleasure Economy

Retail buying has never been a static job, but recent volatility in pricing, caused by shifting tariffs, global import costs and freight variations, has demanded a new level of agility for adult industry buyers and managers. As business expenses rise, so does the pressure to optimize the return on every product.

Rin Musick ·
profile

WIA Profile: Cynthia Wielgosz Elliott

The past year has been a challenging one for the team at premier lubricant manufacturer Sliquid. Late in 2024, company co-founder Dean Elliott passed away after battling cancer, though he managed to flash his wide, signature grin until the very end.

Women in Adult ·
opinion

Michigan's Intimate Ideas Offers Playful Retail Setting for Wide Range of Shoppers

Jerry Manis, the regional manager of Intimate Ideas’ Michigan stores, never planned on working in adult retail — but he says it’s turned out to be a surprisingly rewarding gig.

Quinton Bellamie ·
opinion

Kraig McGee Blends Family Values, Creative Background at TAF Distributing

Walk into any Adam & Eve store in the Mountain West region of the U.S. and you’ve likely stumbled into a TAF Distributing outfit. Owned by industry veteran Kraig McGee Jr. and staffed by his closest family members, McGee’s 35 TAF-operated stores span 13 states, from woodsy Idaho to scenic Utah and well beyond.

Colleen Godwin ·
Show More