Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Chief Justice John Roberts announced from the bench Thursday morning that Friday will be the final day on which the Supreme Court will hand down decisions from October Term 2024. Only a handful of pending cases remain — including FSC v. Paxton.

The issue before the court is what standard of review should apply to age verification laws that aim to protect minors — but in the process may burden adults’ access to protected speech. A lower court applied only the “rational basis” standard, whereas FSC, its fellow plaintiffs and free speech advocates have maintained that the highest level of judicial review, “strict scrutiny,” should apply.

A ruling in favor of the adult industry could render state age verification laws around the country vulnerable to challenges, and halt similar legislative proposals in other states unless they make substantial adjustments to satisfy strict scrutiny.

A ruling against the industry could bolster existing state age verification laws, and advance similar legislative proposals in other states.

A decision in either direction is also likely to impact pending litigation. Some cases that were put on hold in anticipation of the court’s decision in this case, including in Texas, Indiana and Florida, could be expected to advance or not, depending on how the court rules.

HB 1181 was passed by the Texas legislature in May 2023 and is a much-augmented version of Louisiana’s age verification law and its many copycat versions in other states. FSC has condemned the law as “blatantly unconstitutional” and a “violation of First Amendment rights of creators, consumers and platforms.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

NYC Adult Businesses Seek SCOTUS Appeal in Zoning Case

Attorneys representing a group of New York City adult businesses are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal of a lower court’s decision allowing enforcement of a 2001 zoning law aimed at forcing adult retail stores out of most parts of New York City.

Teasy Agency Launches Marketing Firm

Teasy Agency has officially launched Teasy Marketing firm.

Ofcom Investigates More Sites in Wake of AV Traffic Shifts

U.K. media regulator Ofcom has launched investigations into 20 more adult sites as part of its age assurance enforcement program under the Online Safety Act.

MintStars Launches Debit Card for Creators

MintStars has launched its MintStars Creator Card, powered by Payy.

xHamster Settles Texas AV Lawsuit, Pays $120,000

Hammy Media, parent company of xHamster, has settled a lawsuit brought by the state of Texas over alleged noncompliance with the state’s age verification law, agreeing to pay a $120,000 penalty.

RevealMe Joins Pineapple Support as Partner-Level Sponsor

RevealMe has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

OnlyFans Institutes Criminal Background Checks for US Creators

OnlyFans will screen creators in the United States for criminal convictions, CEO Keily Blair has announced in a post on LinkedIn.

Pineapple Support to Host 'Healthier Relationships' Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group on enhancing connection and personal growth.

Strike 3 Rejects Meta 'Personal Use' Defense in AI Suit

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings this week responded to Facebook parent company Meta’s motion to dismiss Strike 3’s suit accusing Meta of pirating VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pornhub, Stripchat: VLOP Designation Based on Flawed Data

In separate cases, attorneys for Pornhub and Stripchat this week told the EU’s General Court that the European Commission relied on unreliable data when it classified the sites as “very large online platforms” (VLOPs) under the EU’s Digital Services Act, news organization MLex reports.

Show More