Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

WASHINGTON — Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) and the First Amendment Lawyers Association (FALA) submitted legal arguments asking the court to grant certiorari in Georgia Association of Club Executives v. Georgia. Late last year, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state in that case.

At issue is a state tax requiring establishments that serve alcohol and feature “nude or substantially nude persons” dancing or engaged in “movements of a sexual nature” to pay an annual “state operation assessment” of either 1% of their gross revenue or $5,000, whichever is greater.

The plaintiffs’ petition contends that this tax “singles out businesses defined by the content of their expression.” Because the tax is content-discriminatory, the plaintiffs argue, it should be subject to strict legal scrutiny under the First Amendment, whereas the Georgia Supreme Court applied only intermediate scrutiny in its ruling.

Adult industry stakeholders may be familiar with the concept of strict scrutiny due to its centrality in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the case challenging Texas’ age verification law. That case is currently pending, after the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in January.

“Laws that regulate speech based on its message or subject matter are rightly treated with extreme skepticism because they pose the greatest risk of government overreach,” the FIRE/FALA amicus brief notes. “The content-based distinction is what keeps government from appointing itself the ultimate editor of American discourse, deciding what speech is safe, what speech is suspect, and ultimately, what speech survives.”

In an article for Reason, Emory University law professor Sasha Volokh, who is petitioning the Supreme Court on behalf of the club execs, wrote, “As a content-discriminatory enactment, this tax should be evaluated under strict scrutiny — and should fail because the government could have raised the same amount of taxes in a non-content-discriminatory way, out of general revenues.”

The petition notes that SCOTUS has previously stressed “the general rule that content discrimination is highly suspect and that strict scrutiny is the norm in such cases, even when the government asserts content-neutral justifications.”

It further quotes the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote, “The vice of content-based legislation — what renders it deserving of the high standard of strict scrutiny — is not that it is always used for invidious, thought-control purposes, but that it lends itself to use for those purposes.”

Finally, the petition points out, “A revenue officer will have to inspect the ‘entertainment’ to determine whether the subject matter is erotic. This is the very definition of ‘content based.’”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC Unpacks SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling in Webinar

The Free Speech Coalition conducted a public webinar Tuesday to help adult industry stakeholders understand the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FSC v. Paxton, and its potential implications.

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Show More