Supreme Court Hears Pivotal Texas AV Case

Supreme Court Hears Pivotal Texas AV Case

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the case challenging Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

HB 1181 was passed by the Texas legislature in May 2023 and is a much-augmented version of Louisiana’s age verification law and its many copycat versions in other states. At the time, FSC condemned the law as “blatantly unconstitutional” and a “violation of the First Amendment rights of creators, consumers and platforms.”

The issue before the court is what standard of review should apply to such a law, which aims to protect minors but in the process burdens adults’ access to protected speech. A lower court applied only the “rational basis” standard, whereas FSC, its fellow plaintiffs and free speech advocates maintain that the highest level of judicial review, “strict scrutiny,” must apply.

In a September 2024 statement, FSC argued, “Where a less-restrictive alternative exists — for example, the voluntary installation of filtering software on minors’ devices — the government cannot impose age verification on adults in the name of protecting children.”

According to court transcripts, Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted during oral arguments that the court has previously, on at least five occasions, applied the highest level of legal scrutiny when deciding similar cases.

“For us to apply anything else would be overturning at least five precedents,” she said.

Justice Elena Kagan cited “possible spillover dangers.”

“You relax strict scrutiny in one place and all of a sudden strict scrutiny gets relaxed in other places,” she said. “You treat a clearly content-based law as not requiring strict scrutiny and all of a sudden you start seeing more content-based restrictions that don’t have to satisfy strict scrutiny.”

The court’s conservative justices, by contrast, seemed to suggest that advances in technology have rendered past standards obsolete.

Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett cited the ease with which minors can access adult content online and questioned the efficacy of content filtering across various devices.

“I think that the explosion of addiction in — to online porn has shown that content filtering isn’t working,” she said.

Chief Justice John Roberts opined that “the nature of the pornography” has changed.

“Are those the sort of developments that suggest revisiting the standard of scrutiny as — as something that we should at least consider, as opposed to keeping a structure that was accepted and established in an entirely different era?” he asked.

Derek Shaffer of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, who argued on behalf of FSC and the other plaintiffs, urged the court to follow precedent.

“The tradition on the internet is to say that it will be free and that it is incumbent upon parents to screen out content that is inappropriate for their kids,” he told the justices. “That's where the law should stay.”

Electronic Frontier Foundation Staff Attorney Lisa Femia, who attended the arguments in person, said in a statement, “Nothing in the argument today changed the fact that Texas' age-verification law places immense burdens on adults' First Amendment rights, and we urge the Supreme Court to overturn the Fifth Circuit's decision upholding the law.

“The Texas law robs adult internet users of anonymity, exposes them to serious privacy and security risks, and blocks some adults entirely from accessing sexual content that’s protected under the First Amendment,” she added. “Texas completely failed to appreciate the substantial privacy and security risks at issue, and continued to incorrectly suggest that online age verification – which requires millions of internet users to upload and submit identifying information – is no different than quick, one-on-one, in-person ID checks. Other courts have consistently held that similar online age verification laws are unconstitutional. To protect freedom of speech online, the Supreme Court should clearly reaffirm those correct decisions here.”

The court's decision is expected sometime over the next several months. The court could rule directly on the constitutionality of the Texas law, or it could send the case back to a lower court with instructions as to what level of scrutiny to apply.

Either way, the court’s eventual ruling in the case is expected to impact state age verification laws around the country and other litigation.

In July 2024, a Texas district judge granted a request by Pornhub parent company Aylo to pause proceedings in a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over Pornhub’s alleged failure to implement age verification requirements, pending the Supreme Court's ruling in FSC v. Paxton. In December, a U.S. district court judge paused a lawsuit over Indiana’s age verification law, and Florida’s attorney general asked a federal court to halt the FSC lawsuit challenging that state's AV law, until the court decides the Texas case.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

Show More