Judge in Performers' Blacklisting Lawsuit Says Meta Policy Sounds 'Nefarious'

Judge in Performers' Blacklisting Lawsuit Says Meta Policy Sounds 'Nefarious'

SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge, overseeing a lawsuit claiming that Meta conspired with OnlyFans to blacklist rival premium fan platforms’ talent, said during a hearing Wednesday that the tech giant’s lack of archiving of its “Dangerous Organizations and Individuals” (DOI) list sounded “nefarious.”

As XBIZ reported, Adult Performance Artists Guild board officers Alana Evans, Kelly Pierce and Ruby filed the civil lawsuit in February 2022 against OnlyFans and its owner, as well as against Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook. The suit replicated claims from an earlier lawsuit filed on behalf of FanCentro in November 2021, alleging a conspiracy to engage in “tortious interference with contract and intentional interference with prospective business.”

In March, however, the plaintiffs sought to drop the lawsuit, telling the court that “based on the information Meta defendants provided, the information essential to plaintiffs’ class allegations is not available,” making further discovery efforts “futile.” This was after Meta informed them that the company “found no evidence that any competitor platform was currently on the list, or had been nominated for inclusion,” according to the plaintiffs’ motion.

The plaintiffs are now seeking to drop the suit in such a way as to leave open the possibility of future antitrust claims. Disputing this, Meta has asked the judge to instead issue a summary judgment in the company’s favor.

During this week’s hearing, U.S. District Judge William Alsup questioned the plaintiffs’ counsel’s strategy of not deposing the witnesses offered by Meta, but reserved his strongest language to lambast the tech giant for its peculiar record-keeping methods regarding updates and changes to its controversial DOI blacklist.

The rebuke was in response to Meta attorney K. Winn Allen’s explanation that Meta “has a collaborative review process before new users are added to Meta’s DOI list that involves Meta’s content team, policy team, communications team and legal departments, among others,” legal news site Law 360 reported.

Meta only produced selected old versions of the DOI lists that were included in the email communications disclosed during discovery.

The judge added that it bothers him that a large company like Meta would not have a protocol to regularly store and archive the different versions of its DOI list.

“That sounds nefarious to me, that you are destroying evidence before it is needed,” Alsup told Meta’s attorneys when they implied that the list was a “living” document, always mutating. 

“The list is not living,” the judge pointed out. “It dies each day.”

Alsup appeared especially baffled by the practice of not keeping records on the list because of his background as a corporate attorney familiar with compliance issues. When reviewing the statements by Meta’s attorneys, he said, he thought, “My god, why don’t they keep that?” 

“If I was a lawyer, I would advise them to keep the document,” he added, noting that this would enable the company to share updates of the DOI list with law enforcement.

“So you see, I’m suspicious,” Alsup told Allen. “Your explanation raises more questions than it answers.”

The plaintiffs celebrated the judge’s remarks as a victory.

“I am happy that the judge is having just as hard of a time as we are believing the data doesn’t exist,” Evans told XBIZ. “I hope to see this continue to move forward.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC Drops Florida AV Lawsuit in Wake of SCOTUS Decision

A U.S. district court judge granted on Tuesday a motion by Free Speech Coalition to dismiss the trade association’s lawsuit over Florida’s age verification law, a case that had been on hold pending the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the constitutionality of state AV laws.

Ukrainian President Responds to Porn Legalization Petition

President Volodymyr Zelensky responded Tuesday to an OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine, stating that he would wait for the legislative process to play out “in accordance with established procedure.”

Only Tax Deductions Joins Pineapple Support as Sponsor

Adult industry accounting firm Only Tax Deductions has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

Adult Empire Launches 'Conversations' Podcast Series

Adult Empire has launched a new official podcast series hosted by Nicole Chappelle and Charlie.

Sex Work CEO Launches 'Teams Plan' for AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Teams Plan for its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

2025 XBIZ Amsterdam Website Launches With Call for Speakers

XBIZ is pleased to announce that the website for its annual European conference, XBIZ Amsterdam, is now live.

NC Governor Vetoes Bill Targeting Adult Industry, Override Possible

North Carolina Governor Josh Stein today vetoed a bill imposing new regulations that adult industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

25,000 Sign Petition to Legalize Pornography in Ukraine

An OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine has amassed the 25,000 signatures required for official consideration by President Volodymyr Zelensky.

WannaCollab Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

WannaCollab has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

FSC Unpacks SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling in Webinar

The Free Speech Coalition conducted a public webinar Tuesday to help adult industry stakeholders understand the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FSC v. Paxton, and its potential implications.

Show More