Republican's Anti-Drag Bill Redefining 'Prurient' Passes Montana House

Republican's Anti-Drag Bill Redefining 'Prurient' Passes Montana House

HELENA, Mont. — The Montana House has endorsed a Republican bill aimed at restricting drag shows, which includes a legal redefinition of the term “prurient” as “having a tendency to excite lustful thoughts.”

As XBIZ has been reporting, codifying a legal definition of “prurient” is crucial to current Republican attempts to revive obscenity prosecutions.

Montana’s House Bill 359 is sponsored by Rep. Braxton Mitchell (R-Columbia Falls), a 22-year-old state legislator aligned with Charlie Kirk’s conservative group, Turning Point U.S.A., and with former President Trump’s MAGA movement. In his two years in office, Mitchell has received press attention for denying the results of the 2020 presidential election; for a controversial, ultimately failed attempt to designate “antifa” as a domestic terrorist group; and for tweeting images of the Proud Boys during the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection.

On Thursday, HB 359 passed a preliminary vote 66-33, along partisan lines with all but one Republican supporting the bill, and was expected to pass the House today before heading to the Montana Senate.

Local station KTVH reported that Mitchell affirmed, “Our Republican caucus believes strongly that there is no such thing as a family-friendly drag show.”

Parts of the bill, which was amended after a House Judiciary Committee hearing earlier this month, replicate language used in more than 20 proposed pieces of legislation sponsored by Republicans across the country, purportedly aiming to “ban drag shows for children.”

A Crucial Redefinition of 'Prurient'

Tennessee’s version of the bill yesterday became the first one to clear both chambers of a state legislature and head to the governor’s desk. However, unlike Montana’s HB 359, Tennessee’s SB0003 — which expands the definition of “obscenity and pornography” to criminalize anyone who “engages in an adult cabaret performance on public property or in a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult” and targets “male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest” — does not define the word “prurient.”

House Majority Leader Sue Vinton (R-Billings) also quoted blatantly homophobic and stigmatizing language from the committee hearing, which referred to some LGBTQ+ people as “groomers.”

An attempt by a Democratic representative to replace references to drag with the more general “adult-oriented performances” was opposed by Republicans, who said HB 359 would be weakened if it only prohibited performances “‘intended to appeal’ to a prurient interest,” KTVH reported, noting that the bill’s backers have asserted that “drag performances can’t be separated from sexuality.”

Taking Aim at the 'Miller Test'

Industry attorney Lawrence Walters, of Walters Law Group, explained to XBIZ in 2020 that the word “prurient” is defined in the law as “a shameful or morbid interest in sexuality.” Walters pointed out that obviously, adult businesses take the position that their content “does not involve a shameful or morbid interest in human sexuality, but a healthy one.”

The Nixon-era Supreme Court set the standard for judging obscenity in the 1973 case Miller v. California as, "Whether, to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material … appeals to prurient interest."

This “Miller test” is used by courts all the way up to the United States Supreme Court for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled “obscene” and therefore not protected under the First Amendment.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

JuicyAds Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

JuicyAds has won its World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) case against a website using a similar domain to impersonate the company's site and defraud customers.

Anissa Kate, Jordan Starr Top AEBN for Q2 of 2025

AEBN has published its top-selling stars for the second quarter of 2025, with Anissa Kate landing atop the leaderboard for straight theaters and Jordan Starr heading up the gay rankings.

AEBN Reveals Eva Maxim as Top Trans Star for Q2 of 2025

AEBN has published its top trans stars list for the second quarter of 2025, with Eva Maxim landing atop the leaderboard.

France Reinstates Age Verification Rule for EU Sites

France’s highest court, the Council of State, on Tuesday reinstated age verification rules for EU-based sites under the country’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, ruling in favor of the French government and against Hammy Media.

Whisper Fans Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

Whisper Fans has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

Utherverse Launches 'Red Light Center' Virtual World

Virtual reality and metaverse technology company Utherverse has launched its new virtual world, RedLightCenter.io.

European Commission Approves AV Guidelines, Unveils Prototype App

The European Commission on Monday released its final, approved guidelines for protecting minors online under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and made public a “white label” age verification app intended to help sites and platforms comply with age verification rules under the DSA.

Show More