Republican's Anti-Drag Bill Redefining 'Prurient' Passes Montana House

Republican's Anti-Drag Bill Redefining 'Prurient' Passes Montana House

HELENA, Mont. — The Montana House has endorsed a Republican bill aimed at restricting drag shows, which includes a legal redefinition of the term “prurient” as “having a tendency to excite lustful thoughts.”

As XBIZ has been reporting, codifying a legal definition of “prurient” is crucial to current Republican attempts to revive obscenity prosecutions.

Montana’s House Bill 359 is sponsored by Rep. Braxton Mitchell (R-Columbia Falls), a 22-year-old state legislator aligned with Charlie Kirk’s conservative group, Turning Point U.S.A., and with former President Trump’s MAGA movement. In his two years in office, Mitchell has received press attention for denying the results of the 2020 presidential election; for a controversial, ultimately failed attempt to designate “antifa” as a domestic terrorist group; and for tweeting images of the Proud Boys during the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection.

On Thursday, HB 359 passed a preliminary vote 66-33, along partisan lines with all but one Republican supporting the bill, and was expected to pass the House today before heading to the Montana Senate.

Local station KTVH reported that Mitchell affirmed, “Our Republican caucus believes strongly that there is no such thing as a family-friendly drag show.”

Parts of the bill, which was amended after a House Judiciary Committee hearing earlier this month, replicate language used in more than 20 proposed pieces of legislation sponsored by Republicans across the country, purportedly aiming to “ban drag shows for children.”

A Crucial Redefinition of 'Prurient'

Tennessee’s version of the bill yesterday became the first one to clear both chambers of a state legislature and head to the governor’s desk. However, unlike Montana’s HB 359, Tennessee’s SB0003 — which expands the definition of “obscenity and pornography” to criminalize anyone who “engages in an adult cabaret performance on public property or in a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult” and targets “male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest” — does not define the word “prurient.”

House Majority Leader Sue Vinton (R-Billings) also quoted blatantly homophobic and stigmatizing language from the committee hearing, which referred to some LGBTQ+ people as “groomers.”

An attempt by a Democratic representative to replace references to drag with the more general “adult-oriented performances” was opposed by Republicans, who said HB 359 would be weakened if it only prohibited performances “‘intended to appeal’ to a prurient interest,” KTVH reported, noting that the bill’s backers have asserted that “drag performances can’t be separated from sexuality.”

Taking Aim at the 'Miller Test'

Industry attorney Lawrence Walters, of Walters Law Group, explained to XBIZ in 2020 that the word “prurient” is defined in the law as “a shameful or morbid interest in sexuality.” Walters pointed out that obviously, adult businesses take the position that their content “does not involve a shameful or morbid interest in human sexuality, but a healthy one.”

The Nixon-era Supreme Court set the standard for judging obscenity in the 1973 case Miller v. California as, "Whether, to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material … appeals to prurient interest."

This “Miller test” is used by courts all the way up to the United States Supreme Court for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled “obscene” and therefore not protected under the First Amendment.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

2025 XBIZ Amsterdam Website Launches With Call for Speakers

XBIZ is pleased to announce that the website for its annual European conference, XBIZ Amsterdam, is now live.

NC Governor Vetoes Bill Targeting Adult Industry, Override Possible

North Carolina Governor Josh Stein today vetoed a bill imposing new regulations that adult industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

25,000 Sign Petition to Legalize Pornography in Ukraine

An OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine has amassed the 25,000 signatures required for official consideration by President Volodymyr Zelensky.

WannaCollab Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

WannaCollab has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

FSC Unpacks SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling in Webinar

The Free Speech Coalition conducted a public webinar Tuesday to help adult industry stakeholders understand the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FSC v. Paxton, and its potential implications.

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect in South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Show More