Arkansas Republicans Rewrite Anti-Drag Bill to Target All 'Adult-Oriented Performances'

Arkansas Republicans Rewrite Anti-Drag Bill to Target All 'Adult-Oriented Performances'

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — The Arkansas House endorsed Senate Bill 43 on Monday, after Republicans amended it to shift the focus of the legislation from restricting “drag performance” to restricting all “adult-oriented performances” in the state.

The amended bill, originally filed by Sen. Gary Stubblefield (R-Branch), passed 78-15 with two voting present, and now returns to the state Senate.

As XBIZ reported, Democratic state senators and LGBTQ+ advocates in Arkansas had raised concerns that SB 43 would limit the rights of transgender people and also redefine the legal concept of “prurient interest,” which is at the core of recent Republican attempts to reinstate obscenity prosecutions.

Although the amended bill no longer singles out shows “in which at least one performer exhibits a gender identity that is different from the performer's gender assigned at birth,” it expands the restriction based on a performance’s “appeal to the prurient interest.”

The amended SB 43 “looks a lot different than it initially did,” the Arkansas Times noted, adding that “the bill got completely overhauled in a House committee after Attorney General Tim Griffin apparently signaled that it was not likely to hold up in court.”

The bill now prohibits minors from attending any “adult-oriented” performance, which it defines as a performance intended to “appeal to the prurient interest and that features a person who appears in a state of nudity or is semi-nude; the purposeful exposure, whether complete or partial, of a specific anatomical area, or prosthetic genitalia or breasts; or a specific sexual activity.”

Fear and Loathing of 'San Francisco'

Co-sponsor Rep. Mary Bentley (R-Perryville) told the House that without the bill, it was not illegal for a child to go to a strip club, although as the Arkansas Times explained, “it effectively is because of alcohol laws.”

Before the vote, Bentley read a letter from a man who claimed he had “retired from the military with his family to Batesville because it was far away from the corrupting influences of big cities.” But after the Arkansas town held a Pride event, which according to the letter featured “a drag show in which genital areas were exposed,” the man now feared that small-town Arkansas would end up “becoming San Francisco.”

Dissenting, Rep. Tippi McCullough (D-Little Rock) told the House that it was problematic that “prurient” was not defined in the bill. The term is not currently defined in Arkansas law either, but Stubblefield — like other Republican lawmakers across the country — wants it defined as “showing excessive interests in sexual matters.”

Republicans Seek to Revive Obscenity Prosecutions

Last month, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R) endorsed the previous, anti-drag version of SB 43 and told the press she would sign the bill because she believes it “protects the children of Arkansas.”

Republicans throughout the country are seeking to outlaw all adult content by overturning the 1973 “Miller Test” differentiating First Amendment-protected sexual material from illegal “obscene” material produced to appeal to “a prurient interest.”

The United States does not currently have a national definition of obscenity. Jurisprudence has established the Miller Test, which has been a legal standard in federal courts for a half-century.

Last December, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), a bill that nominally aims to “establish a national definition of obscenity” but which would, in effect, outlaw all online sexual content nationwide.

Main Image: Arkansas State Sen. Gary Stubblefield (R-Branch) (Photo: Arkansas Senate)

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Ofcom Releases Transparency Reporting Guidelines

Ofcom, the U.K. media regulator, has made public its official guidance detailing how online service providers — including adult sites — will be required to publish annual transparency reports on their efforts to protect children from online harms.

New AV Rules Take Effect for Ireland-Based Sites

Ireland’s Online Safety Code came into force Monday, including a provision requiring adult sites headquartered in Ireland to implement age assurance measures beyond self-declaration.

XBIZ Amsterdam Calls on New Startups for 'Spotlight' Program

XBIZ is pleased to announce that its new “Startup Spotlight” programming will make its European premiere at XBIZ Amsterdam 2025, set to take place Sept. 2-5 at the Jakarta Hotel Amsterdam.

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

JuicyAds Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

JuicyAds has won its World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) case against a website using a similar domain to impersonate the company's site and defraud customers.

Anissa Kate, Jordan Starr Top AEBN for Q2 of 2025

AEBN has published its top-selling stars for the second quarter of 2025, with Anissa Kate landing atop the leaderboard for straight theaters and Jordan Starr heading up the gay rankings.

AEBN Reveals Eva Maxim as Top Trans Star for Q2 of 2025

AEBN has published its top trans stars list for the second quarter of 2025, with Eva Maxim landing atop the leaderboard.

France Reinstates Age Verification Rule for EU Sites

France’s highest court, the Council of State, on Tuesday reinstated age verification rules for EU-based sites under the country’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, ruling in favor of the French government and against Hammy Media.

Show More