Republicans Move Forward With Redefinition of 'Prurient Interest' in Arkansas

Republicans Move Forward With Redefinition of 'Prurient Interest' in Arkansas

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Democratic state senators and LGBTQ+ advocates in Arkansas are raising concerns that a proposed bill targeting drag performances would limit the rights of transgender people and also redefine the legal concept of “prurient interest,” which is at the core of recent Republican attempts to reinstate obscenity prosecutions.

Arkansas Senate Bill 43, sponsored by Sen. Gary Stubblefield (R-Branch), defines a drag performance as a show in which at least one performer exhibits a “gender identity that is different from the performer's gender assigned at birth” and which appeals to the prurient interest, the Arkansas Democrat Gazette reported.

Critics of SB 43 point out that the term “prurient” is “not legally well-defined and could apply to plays and events such as drag queens reading storybooks to children,” the Arkansas Democrat Gazette noted. The term is not currently defined in Arkansas law, but Stubblefield — like other Republican lawmakers across the country — wants to define it to mean “showing excessive interests in sexual matters.” 

The Arkansas Senate approved SB 43 on Tuesday in a 29-6 vote along party lines. If the bill is approved by the State House, it will be sent to Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R).

Gov. Sanders Claims Bill 'Protects the Children'

Yesterday, Sanders endorsed SB 43 and told the press she would sign the bill because she believes it “protects the children of Arkansas.”

Stubblefield told senators on Tuesday that he “can’t think of anything good that can come from taking children and putting them in front of a bunch of grown men dressed like women.”

“Morally, we are going down a funnel,” Stubblefield added.

During a committee hearing last week, Stubblefield quoted at length statements that he alleged came from a drag queen he did not identify. Stubblefield said this anonymous person had “asked him to protect Arkansas’s youth from the titillation of glittery gender-bending artistic displays,” the Arkansas Times reported.

Stubblefield claimed this person had told him that their fellow drag queens “put on makeup, jump up on the floor, writhe around and do sexual things.”

“Would you want a stripper, or porn, to influence your child? It makes no sense at all!” Stubblefield continued. “These are not my words. This is the testimony from a person who is a drag queen. There’s a lot of filth that goes on, a lot of sexual stuff that goes on backstage. There’s a lot of nudity, a lot of sex, a lot of things.”

Stubblefield closed his testimony by reading from the book of Deuteronomy, preaching that “the Bible says if a man dresses like a woman and a woman dresses like a man, it is an abomination to God.”

“It appears to me you’re trying to put a target on people’s backs that are not, according to you, normal,” Sen. Stephanie Flowers (D-Pine Bluff) told Stubblefield.

A Blitz of Republican Bill Proposals to Revive Morality Prosecutions

As XBIZ reported, last week two other Republican state senators in Arkansas introduced a bill requiring age verification before viewing pornographic websites.

Senate Bill 66, which proposes a “Protection of Minors from Distribution of Harmful Material Act,” is sponsored by Sen. Tyler Dees (R-Siloam Springs) and Sen. Jim Petty (R-Van Buren). The proposed legislation is a copycat version of Louisiana’s Act 440, a new law championed by a religious anti-porn activist Republican legislator.

According to NBC affiliate KARK, SB 66 would require “a digitized identification card to prove that anyone from Arkansas trying to enter a pornography website is over 18.”

The bill also claims that “pornography is creating a public health crisis and contributes to the hyper-sexualization of minors,” KARK reported.

The bill includes the senators’ definition of what kinds of material would constitute “pornography,” and mandates that “any website with over 23.33% of its material meeting the pornography description” institute age verification.

Republicans throughout the country are seeking to outlaw all adult content by overturning the 1973 “Miller Test” differentiating First Amendment-protected sexual material from illegal “obscene” material produced to appeal to “a prurient interest.”

The United States does not currently have a national definition of obscenity. Jurisprudence has established the Miller Test, which has been a legal standard in federal courts for a half-century.

Last month, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), a bill that nominally aims to “establish a national definition of obscenity” but which would, in effect, outlaw all online sexual content nationwide.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

25,000 Sign Petition to Legalize Pornography in Ukraine

An OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine has amassed the 25,000 signatures required for official consideration by President Volodymyr Zelensky.

WannaCollab Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

WannaCollab has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

FSC Unpacks SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling in Webinar

The Free Speech Coalition conducted a public webinar Tuesday to help adult industry stakeholders understand the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FSC v. Paxton, and its potential implications.

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect in South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Show More