Canadian Government Sends Controversial 'Online Harms' Bill Back to the Drawing Board

Canadian Government Sends Controversial 'Online Harms' Bill Back to the Drawing Board

OTTAWA — The Canadian government released its report on a controversial "online harms" bill today, highlighting concerns raised by stakeholders and sending it back to the drawing board.

According to CBC News, Canada’s Heritage Department, which would have been in charge of implementing Bill C-10, was compelled to acknowledge serious issues since “multiple civil society groups have expressed reservations with the federal government's proposed online harm legislation, which would force tech giants to take down flagged content within 24 hours.”

That requirement and other provisions of the bill were initially justified to the Canadian public during a heated period when a number of legislators from all five major parties targeted Montreal-based MindGeek in an atmosphere of “porn panic.” The proposal itself was linked to a series of parliamentary hearings in early 2021 targeting MindGeek’s tube site Pornhub.

New Report Follows Broad Consultation

As XBIZ reported last August, the Canadian government invited “stakeholders and Canadians” to submit comments regarding the bill's proposed updates to Canada's Broadcasting Act, and today's report is the result of that broad consultation.

The government’s call for comment stated that, although “social media platforms and other online communications services play a vital and important role in Canada’s society and economy,” they can also “be abused and used to incite hate, promote violence and extremism or for other illegal activity.”

“The Government of Canada is committed to taking meaningful action to combat hate speech and other kinds of harmful content online, including child sexual exploitation content, terrorist content, content that incites violence, and the non-consensual sharing of intimate images,” it continued.

Groups like NCOSE and Exodus Cry, and anti-porn activists like Laila Mickelwait, who was invited earlier last year to testify before the Canadian Parliament, have long argued that since neither age nor consent can be verified by merely watching a video or image, all sexual content online should be subject to takedowns. Longstanding First Amendment and free-speech arguments, they allege, are not applicable because of vague anti-“human trafficking” carveouts, including controversial U.S. law FOSTA-SESTA, which they hoped Canada would emulate.

But today’s report by the Heritage Department explicitly noted that “marginalized and racialized groups are particularly likely to be affected by the requirement to force tech companies, such as Facebook and Twitter, to quickly remove content that is flagged as offensive,” the CBC explained.

“Following consultations with various community groups last summer, the report said respondents believed the 24-hour requirement was flawed because it would give platforms an incentive to be overly vigilant and remove more content than necessary to avoid breaking the law,” the CBC report continued.

Proposal Included 'Systematically Flawed' Censorship Provision

The Canadian government now admits that “a significant majority of respondents asserted that the 24-hour requirement was systematically flawed. It would incentivize platforms to be over-vigilant and over-remove content, simply to avoid non-compliance.”

Google submitted a response to the consultation, expressing concern “about the government potentially limiting freedom of expression.”

Similar points were made last year by sex workers and advocates during the parliamentary hearings targeting Pornhub and MindGeek. The hearings' organizers had initially neglected to include sex worker voices in the debate and only invited them after mounting social media pressure.

The Heritage Department told the CBC that “it intends to engage with experts over the next few weeks now that the report is out,” but offered “no timeline for the introduction of legislation” beyond a commitment “to move as quickly as possible.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

NATS Launches Integrated Content Management System

Too Much Media (TMM) has rolled out an integrated, no-charge Content Management System (CMS) to its NATS platform.

AEBN Reveals Avery Lust as Top Trans Star for Q3 of 2025

AEBN has published its top trans stars list for the third quarter of 2025, with Avery Lust landing atop the leaderboard.

FSC: California's Device-Based AV Law Does Not Apply to Adult

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) put out an advisory today explaining that California's new device-based age verification law does not apply to adult websites.

Reena Sky Launches New Paysite

Reena Sky has launched her new official paysite, ILoveReenaSky.com.

NextGen Payment Joins ASACP as Corporate Sponsor

NextGen Payment has signed on as the latest corporate sponsor for the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP).

Lauren Phillips, Derek Kage Cap AEBN's Top Stars for 3rd Quarter of 2025

AEBN has revealed its most popular performers in straight and gay theaters for the third quarter of 2025.

XBIZ 2026 Conference to Debut All-New Company Lounges, Community Track

The event website for XBIZ 2026 is now live, unveiling details for North America’s largest adult industry conference, including two all-new show features: Company Lounges and a Community Track.

Mymember.site Integrates VR Functionality

Mymember.site has added virtual reality playback capability to its website management platform.

Texas Patti to Launch Fetish Platform 'EmpireDom'

Performer and content creator Texas Patti is launching a new platform for doms and fetish creators, EmpireDom.com.

Ohio AG Threatens Action Against 'Major' Adult Sites Over AV Law

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost announced today that his office is sending "notice of violation" letters to 19 adult websites for failure to comply with the state's recently enacted age verification law.

Show More