Plaintiffs Seek to Overturn Section 230 Ruling Protecting Reddit in Alleged CSAM Case

Plaintiffs Seek to Overturn Section 230 Ruling Protecting Reddit in Alleged CSAM Case

PASADENA — A dismissed class-action lawsuit against Reddit, alleging that the platform “knowingly benefits from lax enforcement of its content polices, including for child pornography,” has been revived through an appeal to the Ninth Circuit.

The lawsuit, which cited FOSTA-SESTA and was filed in April by attorneys for a pseudonymous Jane Doe, was dismissed in October. At that time, U.S. District Judge James V. Selna found that Section 230 shielded Reddit from “allegations of profiting off of child pornography,” legal news site Law 360 reported last week in an article describing the late-November appeal.

The civil lawsuit was filed by class-action specialist attorneys Davida Brook, Krysta Kauble Pachman, Arun Subramanian and Steve Cohen, representing the firms Susman Godfrey LLP and Pollock Cohen LLP. Reddit successfully invoked Section 230 to counteract the lawyers' claims that it should be liable for user-generated content uploaded by third parties — in this case, content that allegedly depicted the underage Jane Doe in sexual situations.

A String of Lawsuits Testing Section 230 Protections

As XBIZ reported back in April, after years of being targeted by religious anti-porn organization NCOSE for allowing sexual content from third-party uploaders, Reddit became the latest defendant in an orchestrated campaign of civil lawsuits attempting to challenge Section 230 protections in the name of protecting victims of sex trafficking.

Like similar lawsuits filed against Facebook, Twitter, Pornhub and WGCZ under NCOSE’s sponsorship, the Reddit lawsuit refers to an illegal video shot and uploaded by a third party. In each case, the third party is not part of the lawsuit. Instead, the plaintiff looks for a settlement from a large online platform that supposedly “promoted and monetized” the content.

This is the exact situation that Section 230 was meant to address in shielding platforms from this type of lawsuit. However, in 2018, Congress enacted FOSTA-SESTA, creating a loophole negating platform immunity in cases concerning “federal sex trafficking laws.”

The Jane Doe, according to an April report by tech site The Verge, is “seeking a class action suit representing anyone who had similar photos or videos posted on Reddit while they were under 18 years of age. She’s accusing Reddit of distributing child pornography, failing to report child sexual abuse material and violating the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.”

On November 29, according to Law 360, “the proposed class — composed of people identified only as Jane and John Does — filed a notice of appeal with the Ninth Circuit Monday, seeking to overturn the dismissal with prejudice. The notice included no other information about the appeal.”

Back in August, the Law 360 report continued, “the plaintiffs argued against Reddit's motion to dismiss at the trial court level. They said that dismissing the case on Section 230 grounds would 'impair or limit' the enforcement of [Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act's] civil remedy, precisely the opposite of what the statute directs.”

FOSTA-Invoking Lawyers Claim Reddit is 'A Haven for Pedophiles'

The complaint filed in April, Law 360 reported, “claims Reddit is cognizant that it has become a haven for pedophiles looking for child porn. One of the lead plaintiffs is a woman who claims an ex-boyfriend of hers posted videos and pictures of the two having sex on subreddits. She was 16-years-old at the time the videos and images were taken and reported the posts to Reddit, her suit claims. The site was slow to take action against the posts and did not permanently ban her boyfriend, the complaint said. Reddit was much quicker to act on a copyright violation claim from the plaintiff rather than on a report that the content was illegal, the lawsuit said.”

“Reddit's refusal to act has meant that for the past several years,” the plaintiff's lawyers wrote, “Jane Doe has been forced to log on to Reddit and spend hours looking through some of its darkest and most disturbing subreddits so that she can locate the posts of her underage self, and then fight with Reddit to have them removed.”

Neither party has released any comment about the appeal.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Show More