U.S. Senator Asks for Repeal of Section 230, Censorship of 'Sexually Impure' Content

U.S. Senator Asks for Repeal of Section 230, Censorship of 'Sexually Impure' Content

WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty (R-Tennessee) has unveiled a bill to repeal Section 230 — the so-called “First Amendment of the Internet” — and replace it with something he calls “Section 232.”

His “21st Century Foundation for the Right to Express and Engage in Speech Act,” or "21st Century FREE Speech Act" for short, proposes replacing Section 230 immunity that protects platforms from liability arising from third-party uploads with a completely different regulatory framework that would change the nature of online communication as we know it.

Hagerty declared intention is to “to repeal section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 and ensure reasonable, non-discriminatory access to online communications platforms.”

Redefining Internet Platforms as 'Common Carriers'

The lengthy preamble of Hagerty’s bill claims that Section 230 allows “interactive computer services” (presumably platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube) to drive “control and censorship” instead of encouraging “the development of technologies which maximize user control over what information is received by individuals, families and schools who use the internet and other interactive computer services.”

Hagerty’s bill also attempts to establish as U.S. federal policy the act of “facilitat[ing] the development and utilization of blocking and filtering technologies that empower parents to restrict their children’s access to objectionable or inappropriate online material.”

The bill does not define what Hagerty considers “objectionable or inappropriate online material.”

The proposed FREE Speech Act also attempts to redefine “the major internet communications platforms” as entities “which function as common carriers in terms of their size, usage and necessity.”

These pseudo-“common carriers,” Hagerty said, must be “available to all users on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms free from public or private censorship of religious and political speech.”

In quite explicit terms, Hagerty’s bill establishes a protection from censorship of “religious and political speech” while at the same time encouraging the censorship of “objectionable and inappropriate online material.”

The Shadow of Obscenity Prosecutions

Moreover, Hagerty’s bill mandates that government regulation on the internet ensures “vigorous enforcement of federal criminal laws to deter and punish trafficking in online obscenity, stalking and harassment.”

Reviving “obscenity prosecutions” has been part of various Republican platforms over the last few election cycles, although former-President Trump’s Attorneys General did not go beyond making speeches calling for it.

After mandating that these “interactive computer services” may not “make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, class of persons, political or religious group or affiliation, or locality; and may not subject any particular person, class of persons, political or religious group or affiliation, or locality to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage,” Hagerty also would like these platforms to “disclose, through a publicly available, easily accessible website, accurate material regarding the content management, moderation, promotion, account termination and suspension, and curation mechanisms and practices of the company.”

Moreover, Hagerty retains the Section 230 provision giving platforms immunity of liability “on account of any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, promoting self-harm, or unlawful, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected.”

'The Form of Immorality Which Has Relation to Sexual Impurity'

Hagerty’s bill also defines “the terms ‘obscene,’ ‘lewd,’ ‘lascivious,’ and ‘filthy’ with respect to material that, taken as a whole, "appeals to the prurient interest in sex or portrays sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and does not have serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value; depicts or describes sexual or excretory organs or activities in terms patently offensive to the average person, applying contemporary community standards; or signifies the form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity, taking into account the standards at common law in prosecutions for obscene libel.”

This section of Hagerty’s bill proposal would essentially enshrine a peculiarly vague notion of sexual content (i.e. “signifies the form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity”) and would turn the new FREE Speech Act into an active call for state and corporate censorship.

Main Image: Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tennessee)

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Show More