Liberal Think Tank Floats 'Digital Regulatory Agency' to Oversee Internet

Liberal Think Tank Floats 'Digital Regulatory Agency' to Oversee Internet

NEW YORK — While President Donald Trump and a group of Republican Senators continue railing against Section 230, the deputy director at a liberal-leaning think tank at NYU published a study and an article advocating for the creation of a new government entity to be called the “Digital Regulatory Agency” to oversee the internet.

Paul M. Barrett — a writer who serves as deputy director of the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights under Michael H. Posner, President Barack Obama’s former Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor — offered his regulatory solution as an alternative to the current bipartisan push to reject Section 230, the so-called “First Amendment of the Internet.”

Barrett gave insights into his research and proposed solution in an essay for the prestigious MIT Technology Review entitled, “Why the Most Controversial U.S. Internet Law is Worth Saving,” published today.

“Donald Trump and Joe Biden both want to throw out Section 230,” reads the subhead. “Here’s why America should fix it instead.”

“U.S. president Donald Trump and his Democratic opponent, Joe Biden, agree on at least one issue: the arcane federal law known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act,” Barrett begins. “On September 8, Trump tweeted that Republican lawmakers should 'repeal Section 230, immediately.’ With similar urgency, Biden had told the New York Times last December that ‘Section 230 should be revoked, immediately.'"

Barrett concedes that “there are real problems with the way Section 230 is worded today, but that doesn’t mean lawmakers should toss the whole thing out.” Instead, he argues, “its core ought to be preserved, primarily to protect smaller platforms and websites from lawsuits. At the same time, the law should be updated to push internet companies to accept greater responsibility for the content on their sites. Moreover, the U.S. needs a specialized government body — call it the Digital Regulatory Agency — to ensure that this responsibility is fulfilled.”

This Digital Regulatory Agency, in its incipient stages at the moment, sounds very much like an FCC for the internet.

Retooling Section 230

Barrett’s full argument is the core of a new report from the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, a liberal-leaning think tank headed by Posner, and overseen by a board including influential Democratic donors, members of the Kennedy family and Craigslist founder and philanthropist Craig Newmark.

“Retooling Section 230,” Barrett’s article conjectures, “isn’t the only way to improve the conduct of social-media platforms. It would also be worth creating a specialized federal agency devoted to the goal. The new Digital Regulatory Agency would focus on making platforms more transparent and accountable, not on debating particular pieces of content.”

“For example, under a revised Section 230, the agency might audit platforms that claim their algorithms do not promote sensational material to heighten user engagement. Another potential responsibility for this new government body might be to oversee the prevalence of harmful content on various platforms — a proposal that Facebook put forward earlier this year in a white paper.”

This bureaucratic alternative to the current EARN IT Act, PACT Act and a number of other proposals being studied in Congress is only at the “policy paper” level at this stage, but it could become a middle-of-the-road compromise in the eventuality of a Democratic administration.

To read Paul M. Barrett's "Why the Most Controversial U.S. Internet Law is Worth Saving,” visit the MIT Technology Review.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

AV in Focus: A Guide to Unlocking Compliance With Clarity

The age verification era isn’t coming — it’s here. Laws are already on the books in numerous U.S. states, as well as in the U.K., France and beyond.

Canadian Privacy Commissioner Endorses National AV Bill

Philippe Dufresne, privacy commissioner of Canada, has voiced support for a bill that would impose fines of up to $500,000 on adult sites that do not implement age verification for Canadian viewers.

Ricky Johnson Launches 'Ricky's Resort' Through YourPaysitePartner

Ricky's Room studio honcho Ricky Johnson has launched his latest site, RickysResort.com, through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Industry Attorney Paul Cambria Retires After 50 Years of Practicing Law

After more than a half-century in practice, during which he provided the defense in some of the adult industry's most notable legal cases, attorney Paul Cambria has retired.

2026 XMA Nominations Party Set for Nov. 19 in Hollywood

The 2026 XMA nominations reveal party will take place at Keys on the Sunset Strip on Wednesday, Nov. 19, with red-carpet arrivals starting at 8 p.m.

New VR Membership Site 'DeepInSex.com' Launches

The new 8K VR membership site DeepInSex has officially launched.

NATS Launches Integrated Content Management System

Too Much Media (TMM) has rolled out an integrated, no-charge Content Management System (CMS) to its NATS platform.

AEBN Reveals Avery Lust as Top Trans Star for Q3 of 2025

AEBN has published its top trans stars list for the third quarter of 2025, with Avery Lust landing atop the leaderboard.

FSC: California's Device-Based AV Law Does Not Apply to Adult

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) put out an advisory today explaining that California's new device-based age verification law does not apply to adult websites.

Reena Sky Launches New Paysite

Reena Sky has launched her new official paysite, ILoveReenaSky.com.

Show More