Strike 3 Case: Appeals Court Rebukes D.C. Judge for Anti-Porn Bias

Strike 3 Case: Appeals Court Rebukes D.C. Judge for Anti-Porn Bias

WASHINGTON — A three-judge panel at the D.C. Circuit court ruled yesterday in favor of Strike 3 Holdings’ appeal, allowing them to be granted subpoenas in copyright cases they were filing. This reversed a lower-court ruling where a judge had taken the unusual step of lambasting the adult entertainment company for the nature of its content.

As XBIZ reported after a March hearing, this outcome was expected after several questions posed by the judges — concerning the right of Strike 3 Holdings to obtain the names of people they believe to be infringing their copyrights via Bit Torrent — challenged the lower court's decision against the adult production company, pointing to language that appeared to indicate bias against pornographic content.

Strike 3 Holdings is the company that produces and markets adult films under the umbrella Vixen Media Group, including popular studios Tushy, Blacked, Vixen and Deeper.

Arguing for Strike 3 was its longtime litigator for copyright infringement, Los Angeles attorney Lincoln Bandlaw.

Porn Weighed Heavily

Strike 3 was looking to overturn the peculiar November 2018 ruling by Judge Royce C. Lamberth, which dismissed the company's request to obtain the identity of an alleged copyright infringer. Judge Lamberth lambasted the company and Bandlaw as "copyright trolls" and used a number of phrases that appeared to indicate that his ruling was colored by a disdain for nature of the plaintiff's content.

"Imagine having your name and reputation publicly — and permanently — connected to websites like Tushy and Blacked Raw. Google them at your own risk," Lamberth wrote in his 2018 decision. "How would an improperly accused defendant’s spouse react? His or her boss? The head of the local neighborhood watch? The risks of a false accusation are real; the consequences are hard to overstate and even harder to undo."

The alleged infringer "may not be entitled to the same presumption of innocence a criminal defendant enjoys," Lamberth continued, "but the Court remains uncomfortable publicly presupposing defendant partook in particularly prurient pornography given defendant’s tenuous connection to the infringement."

Back in March, one of the judges asked Mr. Lloyd, the court-appointed amicus who was tasked with arguing in favor of Judge Lamberth's decision, to explain why Lamberth "seemed to weigh very heavily" that Strike 3 makes pornographic content.

Lamberth's seeming fixation with "porn sites" and the "embarrassment" that being on record as a consumer of adult content might produce was probed by the panel.

One of the other judges asked Lloyd if he thought it "wouldn't be a troubling line" of argument to factor "social judgments about the worth of the content being infringed" into a copyright infringement decision.

"What if it was violent content?" the judge asked. "Would [Lamberth have decided] the same thing?"

Abuse of Discretion

Yesterday, as reported by legal news site Law360, the appeals court panel decided that Lamberth "should not have given so much weight to the company's many other lawsuits."

U.S. Circuit Judge Neomi Rao wrote that, in the Strike 3 case, where "a plaintiff alleges that it is the victim of copyright infringement on a massive scale, the mere fact that it has filed a significant number of lawsuits is not a valid basis on which to impute an improper purpose," nor is "the fact that many such lawsuits settle or are dismissed at an early stage necessarily suggestive of improper intent."

Speaking about Lamberth’s claims about the "aberrantly salacious nature" of Strike 3's content, Rao wrote that "the protections afforded by copyright law do not turn on a copyright holder's popularity or perceived respectability."

"The district court abused its discretion by factoring the pornographic content of Strike 3's films into its decision," Rao concluded.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Australian eSafety Commissioner Demands Stricter Child Protection Codes

Australia’s online safety regulator, eSafety, is once again reviewing a “final” draft of industry codes to protect children from pornography and other age-inappropriate content, after eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant rejected the previously announced “final” codes as insufficiently stringent.

Liz Flynt Debuts 'Hustler: 50 Years of Freedom' Book

Liz Flynt has released her new retrospective book, “Hustler: 50 Years of Freedom.”

Nerdgasm: A Look at the Naughty Side of Pop Culture Geekdom

From “Call of Duty” to cosplay, from tabletop dice rolls to dungeon-inspired dirty talk, the worlds of geek fandom and fantasy are no longer confined to the basement. They’ve kicked down the door, shed the “Firefly” tee and gone full frontal.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Moves to Outlaw Internet Pornography

A parliamentary committee of the Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Tuesday approved a measure to outlaw online adult content in the country.

Sweden Bans Purchase of 'Remote' Sexual Services

The Riksdag, Sweden’s parliament, has approved a proposal to criminalize purchasing sexual services performed remotely by streamers and custom content creators.

Asa Akira to Deliver XBIZ Talk at Miami Conference

XBIZ is pleased to announce that decorated performer, Pornhub brand ambassador, and author Asa Akira is set to deliver an exclusive talk at XBIZ Miami.

JustFor.fans Launches 'Fentanyl Test Strip' Initiative

JustFor.fans (JFF) has launched a test strip initiative to combat the nationwide fentanyl crisis.

2025 XBIZ Miami Speaker Lineup Announced

XBIZ is pleased to announce the release of the full speaker lineup for XBIZ Miami, the latest edition of the adult industry’s premier summer conference, set to take place May 19-22 at the Nautilus Sonesta Miami Beach hotel in South Beach.

AV Bulletin: Arizona's About-Face, What New Laws Mean for Adult

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the United States. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, the U.K. and the EU are moving ahead with their own AV mandates and strategies, and legal challenges continue to play out in U.S. courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

Million Billion Media Launches New Website

Management and PR agency Million Billion Media (MBM) has launched a new website.

Show More