Australian Gov. Warns Penthouse Over ‘Obscene’ Pics

SYDNEY — Penthouse, Australia’s top-selling adult magazine, may be required to submit all its future issues for approval by Australian government censors following a ruling by the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC) that its latest issue “emphasized genitals.”

One of the photos in question is described as “a depiction of two breast naked females standing with their breasts pressed against one another,” according to documents obtained by News.com.au.

Penthouse maintains that the images determined to be too obscene by the OFLC are almost indistinguishable from pictures in previous issues of the magazine.

“Images in previous issues were nearly identical, but this is the first time it’s happened to us,” said Penthouse editor Ian Gerrard, who added that he was bewildered by the sudden scrutiny from the OFLC.

Gerrard said that decisions as to what can be depicted in the newsstand editions of Australian Penthouse, described as “weaker” than its American counterpart, are made in concert with regulators from the OFLC.

“We have to avoid ‘genital emphasis’ in our images, which we’re quite stringent about,” Gerrard said. “We look at images published in the past which were approved by the OFLC as a kind of template.”

Gerrard said that he suspects the real problem with the most recent issue may have nothing to do with the photos. The issue at question also contains excerpts from a controversial book written by euthanasia advocate Philip Nitschke.

“[Nitschke’s book] delivers a scathing attack on Attorney General Phillip Ruddock,” Gerrard said.

Ruddock said that the excerpts had nothing to do with the OFLC’s ruling.

“I am advised that the content in question is not the extract from the Nitschke article,” Ruddock said. “In any event, this is a matter for the classification board, which is an independent statutory body.”

OFLC director Donald McDonald said the board is still considering the matter, and has not made a final decision as to demanding prior review of future issues of Penthouse.

According to the OFLC website, a “submittable publication” is any publication that is “likely to be restricted to adults because it contains depictions or descriptions likely to cause offense to a reasonable adult, is unsuitable for a minor to see or read, or is likely to be refused classification.”

Penthouse has until July 15 to appeal the OFLC decision. Gerrard said that if the appeal were to fail, prior review of Penthouse would result in at least $30,000 extra cost per edition.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

AV Bulletin: Age Verification Hits the Mainstream, Ofcom Sets a Date

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

Arcom Reports Age Verification Enforcement Actions Against 5 Adult Sites

French media regulator Arcom released a statement Tuesday detailing recent actions to enforce age verification rules as set forth under France’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law.

Ron Jeremy's Accusers Reach Settlement With Rainbow Bar & Grill

The Rainbow Bar & Grill has reached confidential settlements with a group of women who filed a negligence lawsuit against the Sunset Strip restaurant over alleged sexual assaults committed by Ron Jeremy, according to Rolling Stone.

Sportsheets Joins FSC as Gold Member

Sportsheets has joined Free Speech Coalition (FSC) as a Gold-level member.

AV Bulletin: Two End Runs, Two Failed Bills

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

FSC Helps Defeat Colorado AV Bill

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced that, with its help, Colorado's recently introduced age verification bill has been defeated.

Missouri AG Bypasses Legislature, Declares Age Verification Rule

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey on Wednesday announced a new state regulation requiring adult sites to implement age verification of users, bypassing the legislative process in a strategy not seen before in state-level efforts to mandate age verification.

Attorney Corey D. Silverstein Launches 'Q&A Series' on Social Media

Adult industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein has launched a Q&A series on his social media platforms.

'Over the Top' North Carolina Bill Could Play Havoc With Adult Sites

A bill filed in the North Carolina state Assembly on Monday would impose new rules that industry observers warn could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Swedish Government Proposes Ban on Purchasing 'Remote' Sexual Services

The Swedish government has asked the country’s Parliament to amend Swedish law so that current laws against purchasing sexual services would also apply to acts performed remotely by cammers, streamers and custom content creators.

Show More