BitPay Bans Adult Transactions, But Does It Matter?

BitPay Bans Adult Transactions, But Does It Matter?

LOS ANGELES — With cryptocurrencies continuing their volatile ride, these awkward darlings of the adult entertainment payment world are facing new challenges, even as the industry renews its love affair with the promise of an easy-to-use anonymous payment system.

Although the benefits of anonymity are a key driver of the merger of crypto and porn, many merchants are increasingly eyeing digital currencies as an investment vehicle — hoping that today’s $30 paysite membership fee will be worth $300 tomorrow, due to highly hoped-for value increases; making the prospect appealing for website owners. This of course must be countered with the fact that prospective customers are also hoping their $30 crypto investment will reap big future dividends — and so they may be reluctant to part with their Bitcoin et al in exchange for porn.

While the promise of profits and anonymity has moved the ball forward, one major hinderance to cryptocurrency uptake by adult merchants is the “easy-to-use” part of the equation, where profound crypto confusion leaves merchants cocking their heads like questioning canines when “those in the know” opine how simple it is to “safely set up your own wallet and process transactions yourself.”

That’s nice, but bakers want to bake and porners want to make porn, not figure out homespun crypto. This is where intermediary service providers such as BitPay have stepped in to spackle over the cracks, holding merchants’ hands and providing the missing ingredients for making transaction processing and order fulfillment a seamless process. Indeed, BitPay was instrumental in raising industry awareness of crypto’s potential for adult, while fueling the efforts of early adopters — but BitPay’s place in porn seems to have ended.

Perhaps purposely listed as prohibited activity No. 10 (smartly signified with the Roman numeral “X” on BitPay’s recently updated Terms of Service), “Explicit sexual content” is no longer allowed on the payment processing platform, which once actively courted adult merchants — but unlike many other companies that make such a disclaimer and then turn a blind eye to this policy violation, BitPay now seems to be moving against industry operators using its service.

News of the action broke on Reddit’s r/Bitcoin, where Bacchus Entertainment’s sexy Saffron Bacchus revealed the claimed contents of an email from BitPay’s support team notifying her that she had two months to find a replacement service before her account was terminated due to her offering of sexually explicit content.

Kudos to the company for providing her with advanced notice (something that industry clients have not always received from billing companies departing this market space), but the action still leaves merchants scrambling for a ready replacement.

But should they bother?

While churn among billing providers is nothing new for the industry, the impact of crypto is — and perhaps more concerning than the departure of any one company from adult, is the range of commentary seen on r/Bitcoin in response to Saffron’s post. These ran the gamut from noting BitPay and other intermediaries were conceived as stopgap measures during crypto’s infancy, and are no longer needed (something Saffron and indeed the companies themselves, may debate); to comments questioning the very role of crypto as a porn payment choice and the value of waiting to get paid before allowing access to content.

For paysite owners and performers alike, whether you are interested in crypto or critical of it, reading through the dozens of thoughtful comments can provide useful insights to guide near- to mid-term business decisions.

Although BitPay’s departure from adult, like the departure of any company from the space, lessens the diversity of the industry’s service providers, the firm’s focus on the future of crypto processing can give some comfort to those who embrace this new measure of wealth as a viable option for paying for porn and beyond.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Virginia Becomes Latest State to Weigh 'Porn Tax'

The Virginia House of Delegates is considering a bill that would impose a 10% tax on the gross receipts of adult websites doing business in that state.

Elizabeth Skylar Launches Production Banner on VRPorn.com

Elizabeth Skylar has launched her own virtual reality production banner on VRPorn.com.

CrakRevenue Introduces 'Trend Explorer' Feature for Affiliates

CrakRevenue has debuted the new Trend Explorer feature for its affiliates.

Tube Sites Submitter Introduces 'AI Video Description Generator' Feature

Tube Sites Submitter has introduced its new AI Video Description Generator feature for its platform.

Pineapple Support Releases End of Year Review for 2025

Pineapple Support has released its End of Year Review for 2025, detailing the organization's achievements, challenges, and new initiatives.

XBIZ Miami 2026 Lets the Good Times Roll at New South Beach Venue

Pack your favorite shades and sexiest poolside looks, because XBIZ Miami is splashing into a new hotspot — the chic Goodtime Hotel in the heart of Miami Beach — May 11–14.

UPDATED: Arcom Threatens to Block, Delist 2 Adult Sites Over AV Violation

French media regulator Arcom has sent enforcement notices to the operators of two adult websites that the agency says have failed to implement age verification as required under France’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law.

Final Defendant Sentenced in GirlsDoPorn Case

Former adult producer Doug Wiederhold, previously a business partner of GirlsDoPorn owner Michael Pratt, was sentenced on Friday in federal court to four years in prison for conspiracy to commit sex trafficking.

FTC Takes Another Step Toward New 'Click to Cancel' Rule

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is negotiating the latest procedural hurdle in its effort to renew rulemaking concerning negative option plans, after a federal court previously vacated a “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions.

Show More