Oron Opposes Corbin Fisher's Motion to Seal Settlement Docs

LAS VEGAS — Counsel for file-locker site Oron.com are opposing Corbin Fisher's motion to place two documents under seal.

Those documents include communication between attorney Marc Randazza, Corbin Fisher's general counsel, and Oron attorney Stevan Lieberman, over potential settlement terms after the gay porn studio sued the file-locker site in a $34.8 million copyright infringement claim.

U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro on Friday approved Randazza's request to redact earlier versions of the documents "that allowed third parties to strip away the redaction."  

On Friday, Randazza told XBIZ that the documents were "leaked" — "either someone figured out how to remove the redaction, or someone cut and pasted the PACER stuff on the non-redacted version." (PACER provides online access to U.S. appellate, district and bankruptcy court records and documents.)

Now, another Oron attorney, David Kahn, has filed an opposition to the sealing of the settlement documents.

"The information that plaintiff wishes to place under seal has already been made public, apparently by plaintiff's counsel," Oron's opposition, filed yesterday, states. "Specifically, the 'term letter' at issue here — which plaintiff incorrectly characterizes as a 'settlement agreement' — has already been published throughout the Internet and, as a result, anyone who has access to the Internet has already been informed of the settlement terms that were being discussed by the parties."

XBIZ reported on Friday that there was much more than $500,000 on the table to settle Corbin Fisher's claims.

There would have been an agreement for Oron to turn over the IP addresses, banking details and email addresses of users alleged to have infringed Corbin Fisher's copyrights.

In addition, Oron said that should an agreement be reached it could become particularly helpful towards Corbin Fisher. 

Oron said it could indeed take “both strong and bold measures to keep [Corbin Fisher] content off of its servers” by giving it “unfettered” deletion access to its systems.

Then, in order to generate revenue, removed copyright-infringing content could be substituted for links pointing to locations where people could buy official product from Corbin Fisher instead.

 “Oron will receive no income from such links until Liberty has recouped gross income of $400,000 after which [Corbin Fisher] shall pay to Oron 50 percent of its profits from said links,” Oron suggested.

Oron also offered to “permanently ban, by email address, PayPal account, IP address or any other reasonable and robust metric, any user who is the subject of even a single [Corbin Fisher] takedown notice.”

Any user flagged as infringing Corbin Fisher's copyrights would also have their payments frozen by Oron.

"Oron will assist [Corbin Fisher] in identification and civil prosecution of any parties who have been using Oron to distribute [Corbin Fisher's] copyrighted material, including but not be limited to, full disclosure of IP addresses, banking information, emails and any other information that may assist in [Corbin Fisher] in such prosecution," according to the settlement offer's language.

The deal also would have provided “some public relations help for Oron in order to minimize the chance of other lawsuits being brought against it” by stating that Oron does deserve safe harbor under the DMCA, after all.

Oron ultimately rejected the $500,000 demand to make things go away but later offered $50,000.

Randazza said on Friday that the correspondence over possible settlement terms were simply an exchange of letters "trying to work out the dispute."

"The discussions reflect an attempt to compromise before we started brawling," Randazza said. "I find it unfortunate that they were leaked, as they should have been confidential.  Nevertheless, I think that them being out there shows how reasonable we were willing to be before filing suit."

But in the opposition to Corbin Fisher's motion to seal the documents, Oron attorneys said that the lawsuit "has always been about money and anything else" and that "someone in plaintiff's or its attorney organization has already posted online many of the proposed settlement terms being discussed by the parties."

"Because [Corbin Fisher] has apparently allowed the settlement terms to be disclosed to — and discussed by — the Internet community, plaintiff has destroyed any chance of Oron continuing as a going concern," Oron's opposition statement read. "All that is left to litigate is whether plaintiff is allowed to walk away with a large purse in exchange for destroying a thriving business."

Last month, Corbin Fisher sued operators of Oron.com, alleging they had knowledge of and induced the trading of 232 instances of pirated Corbin Fisher material.

PayPal, AlertPay and CCBill were ordered in the TRO to freeze Oron accounts; VeriSign also was ordered to freeze the Oron.com domain name from any transfers. In addition, Navarro ordered Oron to preserve and restore financial documents key to the case.

Corbin Fisher also served Oron with an injunction prohibiting disposal of assets in Hong Kong. In the Hong Kong order, Oron operators were enjoined from disposing or diminishing in value of its assets up to $3 million.

The file-locker site continues to operate at post time.

View motion to oppose motion to seal

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More