Testimony Begins in Isaacs Obscenity Case

LOS ANGELES — A jury was selected and testimony began today in fetish filmmaker Ira Isaac's obscenity trial.

Isaacs third trial on obscenity charges began today with opening statements and some cross examination.

After jurors left the courtroom this afternoon, the structure of the trial was formally determined: Federal prosecutors and Isaacs' counsel agreed to show two movies Wednesday morning, with some testimony taken in the afternoon.

On Thursday, the final two movies will be shown in the morning, with Isaacs' testimony beginning Thursday afternoon.

Isaacs told XBIZ several weeks ago that he would take the stand in his own defense, saying he may "give the jury a lesson in art" and telegraph to them that "if the artist says it's art, it's art."

Deliberations could begin as early as Friday in the seven-count indictment over Isaac's distribution of  "Mako’s First Time Scat," "Hollywood Scat Amateurs #7," "Hollywood Scat Amateurs #1" and "Japanese Doggie 3 Way."

The fetish filmmaker and retailer all along has contended that the works he has been charged with have artistic value and can't be deemed obscene.

The second day of the trial got under way after U.S. District Judge George King firmed up the jury pool by dismissing some potential jurors for cause or logistical reasons.

After a recess, the 12 jurors and four alternates heard preliminary instructions on their work as jurors, as well as a description of the three-prong Miller test. He cautioned jurors that they must not apply their own standards to the material.

Opening statements began with federal prosecutor Michael Grant, who said that Isaacs all along was selling and distributing the movies charged to make money and not because he was devoted to art.

Isaacs counsel Roger Jon Diamond later said that Grant's charge that Isaacs was "only in it for the money" was ridiculous because all businesses strive to make money. He also noted that Isaacs sold the films and others to consenting adults who ordered them.

After cross examining Grant, King dismissed the jury for the day.

The case, U.S. vs. Isaacs, continues at 8:30 a.m. at U.S. District Court, 255 E. Temple St., Los Angeles.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Alanna Pow Stars in Latest From Brazzers

Alanna Pow stars with Scott Nails in the latest release from Brazzers.

Kimmy Kimm, Khloe Kapri & Alex Jones Lead Latest From Bellesa Plus

Kimmy Kimm and Khloe Kapri star with multi-XMAs winner Alex Jones in the latest scene from Bellesa Plus, titled “Her Last Day.”

BranditScan Rolls Out 2 New Platform Features

BranditScan has introduced its new Traffic Optimization and Doxing Protection features for creators.

FreeUse to Drop New Limited Series 'Time Stop'

FreeUse will premiere a three-part limited series next week, titled “Time Stop.”

NMG Management Partners With Cosplayground to Scale Distribution

NMG Management has partnered with Cosplayground to expand the studio’s digital distribution and licensing operations.

Dreamcam Rolls Out 'Voice Translator AI'

Dreamcam has introduced a Voice Translator AI to its livestreaming platform.

UK Government May Limit 'Step' Porn Ban With New Amendments

The U.K. Ministry of Justice on Friday revealed new government amendments to the pending Crime and Policing Bill, potentially limiting a pending ban on “step” content to apply only if adult performers role-play as minors.

Lola Riley Makes Her WIFEY Debut

Lola Riley has made her debut for Vixen Media Group studio imprint WIFEY alongside her husband, Devon, and Hollywood Cash.

Andi Avalon Is April's 'MYLF of the Month'

Andi Avalon has been named "MYLF of the Month" for April and stars in a new release with Nade Nasty.

Arizona Senate Removes 'Catch-22' Provision From Consent Bill

The Arizona State Senate has amended a bill that would impose new requirements for adult content uploaded online, removing a seemingly contradictory provision that could have effectively made it impossible for adult sites to operate in the state.

Show More