FSC: ICANN Makes No Determination on .XXX

BRUSSELS, Belgium — As the adult industry inches closer to a dedicated .XXX sTLD, the Free Speech Coalition, which opposes the domain name, says the issue is far from over.

“The ICANN board did not approve .XXX today,” said Diane Duke, executive director of the Free Speech Coalition.

“To the contrary, it passed a resolution that among other things, directs the staff to evaluate whether the ICM application is still current and meets the application criteria today. We believe that it is a standard that will be difficult for ICM to meet. Moreover, if the board is looking to GAC (ICANN’s Government Advisory Committee) for advice, the GAC could not have been clearer in its last communication to the board in 2007 that it thought ICM’s application should be denied. The adult entertainment community is opposed to ICM’s application and the Free Speech Coalition is confident that ultimately the Board will make the right decision.”

Essentially, Duke said, the board resolved that, although they had not made a determination as to whether they agreed with the findings of the majority of the independent review panel, they would accept and act in accordance with some of the panel’s findings.

“It is clear that we made an impact,” Duke said. “ICANN board members were extremely uncomfortable knowing that no support exists for a .XXX sTLD in the sponsoring community.”

FSC Board Vice President Tom Hymes said, “My feeling is that the board is painfully aware of ICM’s threat to sue ICANN, and was forced to pass a resolution that many of the board members feel is at odds with the truth. This is not speculation. At the meeting today, several said as much, and I can only add that I was deeply moved by their courage to do so under the circumstances. I do not fault them for acting to protect their organization, and I believe there are a plenitude of serious obstacles to the ultimate realization of this profoundly flawed application.”

In the board discussion prior to the vote, a number of board members commented on why they felt conflicted about the resolution.

Board member Harald Alvestrand kicked off the discussion, saying, “...effectively this forces me to say that it is in the best interest of the organization (ICANN) and the interest of the furtherance of the organization's goals to act as if something is true that I believe is not, in fact, so. This is a very uncomfortable situation, but I can see no better way to move forward.”

ICANN CEO Rod Beckstrom said that while he accepts the contribution to ICANN's accountability and transparency provided by the existence and the use of the independent panel review process, he is nonetheless concerned about the determination by two of the three panelists that the ICANN board should not use business judgment in the conduct of its affairs.

“In my view as CEO, the board must be able to use business judgment in order to protect the global public interest in the coordination of the root of the Internet and the domain name system,” Beckstrom said.

ICANN developed an internal review process (IRP) as a mechanism for stakeholders to challenge Board decisions. ICM was the first to use the process, which put significant pressure on the board to follow the IRP’s decision or risk losing all credibility in the process. Also, Lawley hinted at a possible lawsuit if .XXX is not approved.

“Avoiding an expensive lawsuit and saving face in the IRP process is good for ICANN but as ICANN’s CEO pointed out, it may not be in the best interest of the ‘global public interest’. In the end, I believe that ICANN will do the right thing,” Duke added.

Both ICANN and ICM’s Stuart Lawley will undergo several weeks of due diligence, checking up on technical and financial promises, then spending another few weeks negotiating the contract.

The contract would then go before the board, which would be expected to decide whether it is consistent with previous advice given by ICANN’s Governmental Advisory Committee.

If the document is GAC-compliant, the ICANN board will vote on the contract itself and either approve or not approve .XXX for use.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Show More