Maryland Lawmaker Seeks to Ban True Voyeur Content

BALTIMORE — Mentioning sites such as Upskirt.com and ChurchUpskirts.com by name, Delegate Neil F. Quinter, D-Howard, says he is determined to pass a law making it illegal to take voyeuristic photos or videotape or to post voyeur content on the Internet.

Quinter held a news conference this week to announce that he is introducing a bill that would ban upskirts and downblouses, and he is doing it early enough in the 90-day legislative session to ensure that both the Maryland House and Senate have plenty of time to weigh and vote on its merits.

A bill that would have outlawed upskirting died in the state Senate last year because the session ended before it came to a vote. Another law that would have made it possible to prosecute webmasters who post voyeur content also never came to a vote because time ran out.

Quinter said he became passionate about the issue while he was doing research and typed the word "upskirt" into Google.

"I was not prepared for what I got, which was all these porn sites," he said.

Even if the law does pass, it would only apply to residents of Maryland.

Quinter was accompanied at the press conference by Shelley Lebel, a woman who testified at hearings on the bills that died in the last legislative session that she had been traumatized by when pictures of her cleavage were posted online. She said she will be back to testify again, if necessary.

“If Britney Spears can get her baby pictures taken off the web, then why can't Maryland women get unsolicited pictures of themselves taken off the web?” she asked.

Lebel said she was shocked and frustrated to find out downblousing is not illegal and she could not prosecute the man who took her picture. Voyeurs in the digital age are frustrating prosecutors across the U.S. because snapping pictures up skirts and down blouses is not against the law in most states.

Although 38 states have privacy laws concerning the use of cameras, only 19 specifically punish video voyeurism, and half of those do so only for “private” areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Public areas, such as malls, usually do not fall into this category.

Federal law also does prohibit taking photos of a person without his or her consent in private places such as bathrooms and dressing rooms but offers no protection against such photographs in public places. Also, there are currently no specific laws against posting upskirt and downblouse photos on the Internet.

Prosecutors sometimes can go after offenders by charging them with other crimes, such as disorderly conduct.

First Amendment attorney Lawrence Walters warned that Maryland lawmakers should be careful not to go too far in any attempts to regulate the Internet, adding that, in his opinion, the majority of online voyeur content is staged.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FTC Weighs Reboot of 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking Process

The Federal Trade Commission has invited public comments on a petition to renew trade regulation rulemaking concerning negative option plans, after a federal court previously vacated a “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions.

New Federal Bills Aim to Repeal Section 230

Members of Congress this week introduced two bills calling for the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

House of Lords Approves UK Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

The House of Lords, the U.K.’s upper house of Parliament, has agreed to amendments to the pending Crime and Policing Bill that would make depicting “choking” in pornography illegal and designate it a “priority offense” under the Online Safety Act.

Indiana Sues Aylo Over AV, Calls IP Address Blocking 'Insufficient'

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita has filed a lawsuit against Aylo, alleging that the company and its affiliates have violated both Indiana’s age verification law and the state’s Deceptive Consumer Sales Act.

House Committee Amends, Advances Federal AV Bill

A U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee voted Thursday to amend the SCREEN Act, which would make site-based age verification of users seeking to access adult content federal law, and to advance the bill for review by the full Committee on Energy and Commerce.

FSC Announces Board of Directors Election Results

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the results of its 2026/2027 Board of Directors election.

Report: AVS Group Beefs Up AV After $1.3 Million Fine

Adult content provider AVS Group has begun to institute robust age checks on some of its websites after U.K. media regulator Ofcom last week imposed a penalty of approximately $1.3 million for noncompliance with Online Safety Act regulations, the BBC is reporting.

FSC: Federal Report Confirms Unfair Banking Discrimination Against Adult Industry

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) today announced that a federal report on debanking has concluded that several U.S. banks engaged in discriminatory banking practices against members of the adult industry.

FSC Summit Event Schedule Announced

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has revealed its slate of networking events and symposiums for its annual summit, set for January 15 during XBIZ 2026.

Washington AV Bill Jumps on 'Health Warning' Bandwagon

A new age verification bill in the Washington state legislature would require adult sites to post notices warning users of alleged health risks, despite a previous federal court ruling against such requirements.

Show More