Still No Movement on Ira Isaacs Case

LOS ANGELES — After a week of waiting, the judge in the Ira Isaacs obscenity case still hasn't ruled on a defense motion to dismiss the case based on a claim of double jeopardy.

On Monday, U.S. District Judge George H. King received motions from defense attorney Roger Jon Diamond and the government's legal counsel, Ken Whitted, who serves on the Justice Department's Obscenity Prosecution Task Force.

Diamond told XBIZ that he moved for King to dismiss the case because going forward with the trial again would put his client, Isaacs, on trial for the same charges twice. The case's previous judge, Alex Kozinski, recused himself because of a Los Angeles Times story that revealed he ran a sex-themed website. In doing so, Kozinski called for a mistrial – which Diamond opposed.

"We didn't ask for a mistrial," he said. "We objected to it. We wanted to finish that trial."

A jury in that trial had already been chosen, sworn in and had heard and seen ample evidence. Diamond argued in his motion that another trial would call into play the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against "double jeopardy."

King gave himself a brief recess on Monday to consider the motion, and he originally said he would return in a matter of minutes to deliver his decision. Moments later, he returned and told the court he would need more time to consider the motion. He has yet to hand down a decision.

Diamond said that King has the prerogative to take as much time as he wants to hand down a decision, though Diamond did say it was unusual for him to tell the court he would be back with a quick decision and then take as much time as he has.

"It sounded like he knew what he was going to do," Diamond said.

Although nothing new has happened as of yet, Diamond noted that regardless of the judge's decision, both sides could immediately appeal the decision before the case goes to trial because of the double jeopardy claim involved.

"If the judge rules against us, we wouldn't have to go through the whole trial and then file an appeal based on double jeopardy," Diamond said. "We could file right away."

As for why the judge is taking so long, Diamond could only offer speculation. He suggested that King might be working on a longer, written ruling, or that he might just have other tasks on his calendar.

"What I don't think is that he's been sitting in his chambers this entire time, cogitating over the matter," Diamond joked.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

XBIZ 2027 January Event Series to Take Center Stage at L.A. Live

Culminating years of growth and expansion, with its January event series now spanning eight events, XBIZ Media will bring the entire series together under one roof at the JW Marriott L.A. Live, creating the adult industry’s epicenter for business, networking and celebration from Jan. 7-10, 2027.

Texas Court Orders Adult Site Domain Locked for AV Violations

A district court in Texas has issued a writ requiring domain registry Verisign to “lock” an adult website’s domain over noncompliance with the state’s age verification law.

Federal AV Proposal Passes House, Faces Senate Opposition

The U.S. House of Representatives on Monday passed the Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act, which includes provisions to make age verification by adult websites federal law, but the bill still faces tough going in the Senate.

AV Bulletin: Midyear Roundup

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, more state age verification laws have been enacted around the United States, as well as proposed at the federal level and in other countries. Meanwhile, lawsuits resulting from AV laws have begun to play out in the courts. This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Judge Dismisses Last NCOSE-Backed Suit Over Kansas AV Law

A federal judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit alleging that adult site SuperPorn violated Kansas’ age verification law, citing lack of jurisdiction after similarly dismissing two related cases earlier this year.

Federal AV Proposal Scores Minor Win in House but Remains in Doubt

A newly announced bipartisan agreement in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce may soon bring a proposed federal age verification law before the full House, but the measure continues to face an uphill battle.

Arizona Governor Vetoes 'Protect Act' With New Consent Provisions

Arizona Governor Kate Hobbs on Friday vetoed HB 2133, the “Protect Act,” which would have imposed new requirements for adult content uploaded online.

Brazil Begins Monitoring 18 Adult Sites for AV Compliance

Brazil’s National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) is now monitoring 18 high-traffic adult websites for compliance with the country’s Digital Statute for Children and Adolescents (Digital ECA), which requires such sites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Ofcom Fines First Time Videos $100,000 for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Thursday imposed a fine of 80,000 pounds (more than $100,000) against First Time Videos, which operates FTVGirls.com and FTVMilfs.com, for failing to implement age checks required for compliance with the Online Safety Act.

EU Court: France Can Require Foreign Sites to Implement AV

The European Union’s Court of Justice ruled on Tuesday that France may require pornographic websites based in other EU states to implement age verification in accordance with French law, as long as France follows EU electronic commerce rules.

Show More