Napster Dismissal: File Sharing Not Piracy

SACREMENTO, Calif. — A district court judge has dismissed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Napster Inc., stating, in essence, that simply making a copyrighted file available on a file-sharing network does not constitute infringement.

The upshot is that Judge Marilyn Patel’s decision contradicts early media interpretations of the recently passed Artists’ Rights of Theft Prevention Act of 2005, which was seen as lowering the bar for online copyright prosecutions.

The ART Act, signed into law last month, established criminal penalties of up to three years in prison and hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines for the distribution of "pre-released" movies over the Internet.

At the time of the law’s passage, it was widely interpreted to mean that leaving files open in shared or exposed folders would be enough to prosecute peer-to-peer network operators, regardless of whether any files were downloaded.

This is the argument that plaintiffs in the case, which included UMG Recordings Inc., used in their motion against Napster — that simply making a file available for distribution should be considered an infringing act and that websites that offer such files for download should be held criminally liable for copyright violations.

But in her three-page dismissal order, Patel said she found the plaintiffs’ argument unconvincing because they failed to show evidence of distribution.

Patel went on to say that despite media speculation to the contrary, the language of the ART Act actually makes a clear distinction between “making available” something for distribution and the act of distributing it, and that the plaintiffs conveniently disregarded that language in their abstract.

If Congress had intended to make it a criminal offense to leave files open for download on P2P networks, Patel pointed out, they should have and could have explicitly done so in the language of the law.

Yale Law School fellow Ernest Miller said Patel’s decision could have far-reaching consequences for defense against prosecution under the ART Act.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

AEBN Reveals Eva Maxim as Top Trans Star for Q2 of 2025

AEBN has published its top trans stars list for the second quarter of 2025, with Eva Maxim landing atop the leaderboard.

France Reinstates Age Verification Rule for EU Sites

France’s highest court, the Council of State, on Tuesday reinstated age verification rules for EU-based sites under the country’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, ruling in favor of the French government and against Hammy Media.

Whisper Fans Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

Whisper Fans has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

Utherverse Launches 'Red Light Center' Virtual World

Virtual reality and metaverse technology company Utherverse has launched its new virtual world, RedLightCenter.io.

European Commission Approves AV Guidelines, Unveils Prototype App

The European Commission on Monday released its final, approved guidelines for protecting minors online under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and made public a “white label” age verification app intended to help sites and platforms comply with age verification rules under the DSA.

New Membership Site 'Sluts Corner' Launches

R18 Entertainment has launched a new membership site, SlutsCorner.com.

Roxie Rae Relaunches Site Through XSiteAbility

Roxie Rae has relaunched her site through XSiteAbility.

Federal Appeals Court Vacates FTC 'Click to Cancel' Rule Pending Review

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit on Tuesday vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions, pending further review.

Show More