Acacia, Defense Group Have Another Day in Court

SAN JOSE, Calif. – In the post-Markman hearing process of patent litigation between Acacia Technologies Group and the Joint Defense Group – representing more than a dozen adult industry defendants – a hearing took place yesterday in San Jose, Calif., and according to both sides, no landmark rulings occurred.

Judge James Ware heard oral arguments on two issues: Acacia's motion for a class-action lawsuit against the entire adult industry, and a motion filed by Acacia to dismiss tort claims filed by the Joint Defense Group, which include unfair competition and malicious prosecution.

A source close to XBiz said that Ware took both arguments under advisement and gave no specific date when he would issue a ruling.

The hearing took place over a three-hour period, and while Spike Goldberg of the Joint Defense Group was the only member of the defense team present, the room was attended by a crowd of legal representatives from technology companies interested in how the final outcome of the lawsuit could impact their own Internet and cable-based business models that rely on the use of streaming audio and video.

Robert Berman, executive vice president and legal counsel for Acacia, declined to comment on how the court proceeding went.

However, at one point, in hypothesizing about the advantages of bunching the adult industry into one defense class, the judge was quoted as referring to adult webmasters as "social misfits."

Goldberg told XBiz shortly after the hearing that the issues discussed were of "tantamount importance" to the online adult industry, and that he would be issuing a statement toward the end of the week detailing his notes and illustrating why he thinks Acacia has "sunk to a new low" in trying to defend its streaming Digital Media Transmission patents.

"Yesterday's hearing was just another step in the process," Goldberg told XBiz. "And in some regards, it's more time being wasted by Acacia to stave off the inevitable destruction of their patent."

Acacia filed a motion in April to establish a class-action lawsuit against the adult industry, which could conceivably include hundreds of companies in a single defense category.

Companies infringing on Acacia's patents are defined as those whose video content can be received in the U.S. District Court's Central District of California, which encompasses most of Southern California.

At the time of the filing, Acacia claimed that its interest in creating a defendant class was so that it did not have to relitigate certain issues over and over again.

Dates have been set for two additional post-Markman court hearings on Dec. 2 and 3, during which Ware will hear motions for summary judgment to invalidate two of Acacia's five U.S. patents.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Australian Conservatives Raise Concerns About US-Born Online Censor

Long after progressive free speech advocates in Australia questioned E-Safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant over her campaigns to target adult content, conservatives and libertarians are now raising concerns about the powers granted to the country’s top censor — an unelected former tech exec born in the U.S. — with some calling for her ouster.

Cupcake Girls, Aylo Partner on Educational Video Series for Performers

The Cupcake Girls and Aylo have teamed up to produce a series of educational videos focused on safety standards for adult performers.

California Labor Division Rules in Nicole Doshi's Favor in Motley Contract Dispute

The Division of Labor Standards Enforcement of the California Department of Industrial Relations ruled on Monday in favor of Nicole Doshi in her contract dispute with defunct talent agency Motley Models and its former owner Dave Rock.

Video: FSC's Alison Boden Testifies Before California Assembly Committee Regarding Age Verification

Free Speech Coalition Executive Director Alison Boden testified before the California Assembly Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, in opposition to the state’s version of the age verification bills being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists.

Republicans Behind Oklahoma's New Age Verification Law Gleeful About Potential Pornhub 'Exit'

Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt has signed into law Oklahoma’s version of the age verification legislation being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists.

Woodhull Freedom Foundation Debuts 'Fact Checked by Woodhull' Program

The Woodhull Freedom Foundation has launched its new "Fact Checked by Woodhull" program, which uses peer-reviewed research, compiled and analyzed by professional researchers, to debunk myths weaponized to justify the repression of sex, sexuality and gender expression.

Supreme Court Denies Stay of Texas' Age Verification Law

The U.S. Supreme Court has denied a request by Free Speech Coalition (FSC) and other plaintiffs to stay Texas’ controversial age verification law while the court decides on a petition that would effectively overturn it on constitutional grounds.

Chaturbate Reaches Settlement With Texas Over Age Verification

Chaturbate’s parent company, Multi Media, has reached a settlement with Texas regarding the state’s controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Opinion: Why Device-Based Age Verification is the Key to Protecting Minors Online

Across the United States, state legislators on both sides of the aisle have attempted to tackle the crucial goal of preventing minors from accessing adult content.

Age Verification: FSC's Mike Stabile Reports from the Front Lines

Two years into the religiously-inspired crusade to curtail access to adult material in the U.S. through carefully drafted “age verification” legislation, the constant onslaught of state-by-state proposals and laws — many of them copied from each other — can be hard to follow.

Show More