9th Circuit Panel Denies Double-Jeopardy Dismissal in Backpage.com Case

9th Circuit Panel Denies Double-Jeopardy Dismissal in Backpage.com Case

SAN FRANCISCO —  A three-judge Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel has upheld a lower court's denial to dismiss the case against the former owners of Backpage.com.

Attorneys for former Backpage.com owners Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin, led by First Amendment expert and noted adult industry attorney Paul Cambria, had sought the dismissal due to double jeopardy, after the pair's first trial ended catastrophically for the government in a mistrial due to prosecutorial misconduct.

"We plan to win in court," Cambria told XBIZ today.

As XBIZ reported, oral arguments were presented earlier this month before judges William A. Fletcher, Jay Bybee and Lawrence Vandyke.

Yesterday, the judges denied the appeal. Federal prosecutors could now move ahead and retry the case.

The loss for Lacey and Larkin comes a year after controversial Judge Susan Brnovich — wife of Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, who recently campaigned for a U.S. Senate seat — declared a mistrial in the case.

The mistrial ruling came after prosecutors repeatedly ignored Judge Brnovich's instructions not to attempt to prejudice the jury by bringing up unrelated and inflammatory “child sex trafficking” insinuations.

“The trial judge declared a mistrial in September 2021 due to prosecutorial misconduct,” Stephen Lemons, editor of the Lacey and Larkin-associated website Front Page Confidential and the leading authority on the case, told XBIZ at the time. “The defense moved for dismissal, arguing that a new trial would violate the Fifth Amendment’s bar on trying someone twice for the same crime.”

Lemons explained that a new judge “denied that motion without holding an evidentiary hearing.” The defense then appealed to the Ninth Circuit, eventually resulting in today’s decision.

Judges: Government's Misconduct 'Not Egregious' Enough

The Ninth Circuit panel, Lemons reported today, “conceded that the government committed ‘misconduct’ and ‘did elicit prejudicial evidence in violation of pretrial rulings,’ but the panel ruled that the misconduct ‘was not so egregious as to compel a finding of an intent’ to provoke a mistrial.”

Lemons explained that “defense attorneys could seek a rehearing by the same panel, a review by a larger, en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit, and/or petition SCOTUS for a writ of certiori.”

A member of the defense team told Front Page Confidential that its attorneys “are still reviewing the decision at this time.”

The defense, Lemons told XBIZ today, "faced a near-Sisyphean task in overcoming the legal standard involved, which required them to show not only that the prosecution caused a mistrial in 2021, but that it intended to provoke a mistrial. Now we wait to see if the defense will seek a review of the panel's ruling and if another trial will be in the works."

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Strike 3 Holdings Sues Meta for Pirating Vixen Media Group Content to Train AI

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings filed suit in federal court this week, accusing Facebook parent company Meta of copyright infringement and alleging that Meta has extensively pirated VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pineapple Support, Streamate to Host 'Navigating Grief and Loss' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Streamate are hosting a free online support group to help performers cope with grief and loss.

Friday is Final AV Compliance Deadline in UK

Friday, July 25 marks U.K. media regulator Ofcom’s deadline for user-to-user services such as tube, cam and fan sites to implement its requisite “highly effective age assurance” measures for preventing minors from viewing adult content.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for May, June

AEBN has released the top search terms for the months of May and June from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Two Texas Bills Restricting Sex Toy Sales Fail to Pass

Two bills aimed at restricting sales of sex toys have failed to pass the Texas state legislature during its 2025 session.

NYC Adult Stores Petition for Rehearing in Zoning Law Case

A group of adult businesses on Tuesday petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit to rehear a case involving a zoning law that could severely limit adult stores’ operations in New York City.

Ofcom Releases Transparency Reporting Guidelines

Ofcom, the U.K. media regulator, has made public its official guidance detailing how online service providers — including adult sites — will be required to publish annual transparency reports on their efforts to protect children from online harms.

New AV Rules Take Effect for Ireland-Based Sites

Ireland’s Online Safety Code came into force Monday, including a provision requiring adult sites headquartered in Ireland to implement age assurance measures beyond self-declaration.

XBIZ Amsterdam Calls on New Startups for 'Spotlight' Program

XBIZ is pleased to announce that its new “Startup Spotlight” programming will make its European premiere at XBIZ Amsterdam 2025, set to take place Sept. 2-5 at the Jakarta Hotel Amsterdam.

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

Show More