Texas Judges Claim Jurisdiction Over Facebook Lawsuit Challenging Section 230

Texas Judges Claim Jurisdiction Over Facebook Lawsuit Challenging Section 230

HOUSTON — Texas' Fourteenth Court of Appeals denied yesterday Facebook’s appeal to dismiss a lawsuit in which lawyers for anonymous plaintiffs argued the platform “facilitated the sex trafficking of minors” and is not protected from liability by Section 230.

Facebook had asked the intermediate appellate panel to decide if Texas had jurisdiction over the case, which challenges longstanding Section 230 liability protections for user-generated content.

Section 230 is universally considered by digital rights advocates as "the First Amendment of the internet" and a crucial bulwark against state and corporate censorship of controversial speech, including sexual expression.

The three-judge panel denied the bid, siding with the Jane Doe plaintiffs who — largely based on the controversial FOSTA-SESTA carveout of Section 230 — allege that Facebook “provided an unrestricted platform for predators to exploit and extort children and recruit them into the sex trade,” legal news site Law360 reported.

The Texas Supreme Court ruled in June 2021 that Facebook was protected from several of the claims by Section 230 immunity from liability, but also decided that some of the claims made by the Jane Does — in synchronicity with the arguments of legal staff at powerful anti-porn lobbies like NCOSE — could proceed “under a Texas statute that allows for a claim against anyone who ‘intentionally or knowingly benefits from participating in a venture that traffics another person,’” Law360 explained.

The appellate panel yesterday ruled that since Facebook “does substantial business in Texas through the marketing of its social networking website in the state, profits from the sale of Texas users' personal data and directly advertises its products to millions of Texas users,” the lawsuit can moved forward in the state.

“Texas has a strong interest in protecting citizens of the state by exercising jurisdiction over these types of claims,” Chief Justice Tracy Christopher and Justices Charles A. Spain and Margaret "Meg" Poissant declared.

Christopher is a Republican and Spain and Poissant are Democrats.

Such “user-generated content” cases have become increasingly politicized since the enactment of FOSTA-SESTA, especially after former President Donald Trump took up the crusade to dismantle Section 230 protections.

When discussing one of the cases against the platform in February 2021, Texas Supreme Court Justice Debra Lehrmann — a Republican appointed by Governor Rick Perry in 2010 and then twice reelected — took aim at Section 230 protections, questioning Facebook’s immunity on the grounds that it may have “failed to warn users of the dangers of sex trafficking.”

The case is Facebook Inc. v. Jane Doe, case number 14-19-00854-CV, in the Texas Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

2025 XBIZ Amsterdam Website Launches With Call for Speakers

XBIZ is pleased to announce that the website for its annual European conference, XBIZ Amsterdam, is now live.

NC Governor Vetoes Bill Targeting Adult Industry, Override Possible

North Carolina Governor Josh Stein today vetoed a bill imposing new regulations that adult industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

25,000 Sign Petition to Legalize Pornography in Ukraine

An OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine has amassed the 25,000 signatures required for official consideration by President Volodymyr Zelensky.

WannaCollab Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

WannaCollab has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

FSC Unpacks SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling in Webinar

The Free Speech Coalition conducted a public webinar Tuesday to help adult industry stakeholders understand the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FSC v. Paxton, and its potential implications.

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect in South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Show More