Texas Supreme Court Justice Probes Section 230 Immunity After FOSTA-SESTA

Texas Supreme Court Justice Probes Section 230 Immunity After FOSTA-SESTA

HOUSTON — A Texas Supreme Court Justice questioned long-standing interpretations of Section 230 liability protections this week, while hearing a case that deliberately tests the exception to the so-called “First Amendment of the internet” that was carved out by FOSTA-SESTA for alleged instances of human trafficking.

The Texas Supreme Court is hearing the case after a Harris County district judge and a Houston appellate court rejected Facebook’s argument that Section 230 explicitly shields online platforms from liability for content posted by third-party uploaders.

Lawyers for the three plaintiffs, three women only identified as “Jane Does” who allege they were victims of human trafficking as minors, claim that Facebook would be liable under the exception to Section 230 immunity created in 2018 by FOSTA-SESTA.

The lawyers allege Facebook is liable because it “provided the platform that resulted in their being trafficked,” legal site Law 360 reported.

They accuse Facebook of “negligence, gross negligence and violations of Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 98.002, an anti-trafficking law passed in 2009,” Law 360 reported.

According to the news site, the justices in the Texas Supreme Court questioned during oral arguments yesterday whether Section 230 is applicable if the allegation is that Facebook “provided an unrestricted platform for predators to exploit, extort and recruit children into the sex trade.”

A Republican Justice's Questions

Texas Supreme Court Justice Debra Lehrmann — a Republican appointed by Governor Rick Perry in 2010 and then twice reelected — took aim at Section 230 protections when questioning Facebook’s immunity because it may have “failed to warn users of the dangers of sex trafficking.”

One of the Jane Does’ allegations, Lehrmann highlighted during her questioning of Facebook’s attorney, “is not about the published statement, [but] about the failure of the company to warn that this could lead to violent sexual behavior.”

A lawyer for the Jane Does, Warren Harris of Bracewell LLP, also specifically cited an October 2020 dissent from Justice Clarence Thomas in the Malwarebytes Inc. v. Enigma Software Group USA case.

Thomas surprised legal observers by using that dissent to openly criticize Section 230 and advocate for its reform, a militant act of judicial advocacy from the highest bench that inserted the Justice into an ongoing debate that is the constitutional prerogative of the Legislative branch.

“Courts have long emphasized nontextual arguments when interpreting 230, leaving questionable precedent in their wake," Thomas wrote at the time. "Extending 230 immunity beyond the natural reading of the text can have serious consequences,” he added, and specified his concern about giving companies immunity from civil claims for “knowingly host[ing] illegal child pornography” and “for race discrimination.”

“We should be certain that is what the law demands,” Thomas concluded.

Yesterday, attorney Warren Harris told the Texas Supreme Court that in his view whenever Facebook has knowledge “that traffickers are using its platform to ‘groom children and put them into human trafficking,’ that triggers a duty to warn users,” according to Law 360.

The lawsuit was filed in October 2018, and can be found as Facebook Inc. et al., case number 20-0434, in the Supreme Court of Texas.

Main Image: Texas Supreme Court Justice Debra Lehrmann (Photo: Texas Supreme Court)

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

European Commission to Assess Pornhub, XVideos, XNXX Compliance With Digital Services Act

The European Commission plans to conduct a study to determine how well adult sites Pornhub, XVideos and XNXX are addressing illegal content and other potential harms under the EU’s Digital Services Act.

German Higher Court Upholds Ban on PornHub, YouPorn

The Higher Administrative Court of Rhineland-Palatinate on Thursday upheld a “network ban” on Aylo-owned adult sites Pornhub and YouPorn for failing to comply with German age verification regulations.

Alabama Notifying Adult Sites of New Tax Set to Take Effect Sept. 1

The Alabama Department of Revenue has begun sending notices to adult site operators about a new 10% tax on their revenues, set to be enforced starting Sept. 1.

Ondato, CCBill Announce Strategic Partnership for Global High-Risk Market

Age and identity verification firm Ondato and payment processor CCBill have formed a strategic partnership to serve the global high-risk market.

Ofcom Investigates 4 More Adult Companies for OSA Compliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom has launched investigations into whether four companies operating adult websites have implemented requisite age assurance measures under the Online Safety Act, the agency announced Thursday.

Taylor Nicole Launches New Site Through YourPaysitePartner

Creator Taylor Nicole has launched her new official website through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Adult Networking Platform SpicyGigs.com Launches

SpicyGigs, a new adult industry networking platform, has officially launched.

Pineapple Support to Host 'Cream Pie Challenge' Fundraiser

Pineapple Support is hosting its Cream Pie Challenge through August to raise funds for mental health services for industry performers.

Kyrgyzstan President Signs Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

President Sadyr Japarov of Kyrgyzstan on Tuesday signed into law legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

NC Legislature Overrides Veto of Extreme Anti-Adult Industry Bill

The North Carolina state legislature on Tuesday voted to override Gov. Josh Stein’s veto of a bill imposing regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most creators and content.

Show More