Backpage: Appeals Court Rejects Judge Recusal Over Husband's Activism

Backpage: Appeals Court Rejects Judge Recusal Over Husband's Activism

PHOENIX — The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected yesterday a petition by the defense of the former owners of Backpage.com that they order a recusal of Judge Susan Brnovich over a conflict of interest concerning her husband, Arizona Attorney General and anti-sex work activist Mark Brnovich.

In yesterday’s ruling, a three-judge Ninth Circuit panel ruled against the defense of Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin, and refused to recognize the “appearance of partiality” stemming from Mark Brnovich’s repeated statements and publications — some including demonstrable falsehoods and exaggerations — tying Backpage to “human trafficking.”

Yesterday’s development was first reported by news site FrontPageConfidential.com, which is published by Lacey and Larkin and edited by Stephen Lemons, and is the last journalistic remnant of their once-powerful company, Village Voice Media.

An 'Anti-Trafficking' Crusader

Last September, as XBIZ reported, the defense requested that Judge Susan Brnovich recuse herself over public statements made by her husband, including a lurid pamphlet published by his office.

A month later, Judge Brnovich issued a ruling detailing her refusal to recuse herself from the case, denying the defendants' contention that evidence of her husband’s explicit activism against them as part of a crusade alleging “human trafficking” resulted in a conflict of interest and cast doubts on her impartiality.

Brnovich has argued that the prejudicial comments made by her husband about Backpage were not grounds for her to recuse herself over the conflict of interest.

“This case is not about Backpage,” she reportedly said during one of the hearings, although the federal complaint mentions Backpage more than 600 times.

Lacey and Larkin’s defense have produced copies of AG Mark Brnovich’s tawdry “anti-trafficking” pamphlet “Human Trafficking: Arizona’s Not Buying It,” which features a cover portraying a stock photo of a very young woman wearing a skimpy top and leaning into the window of a car.

The sensationalistic 2017 pamphlet, still available as a government publication, wildly exaggerates the prevalence of what it calls “human trafficking” in Arizona, illustrates it with stock photography of young cis white women in peril that do not match any known statistics about actual human trafficking and repeatedly mentions Backpage — at the time of publication not yet shuttered by the FBI — as engaging in and central to “human trafficking.”

The pamphlet is presented as the thoughts of AG Brnovich and it even begins with an introduction titled “Letter From Mark” (sic) where the public servant — and husband of the federal judge in charge of Backpage’s prosecution — takes full ownership of the alarmist statements that follow.

The Ninth Circuit's Ruling

“Without delving into the petition’s underlying issues,” Front Page Confidential’s Stephen Lemon reported, “the Ninth ruled that the defense’s request for a ‘writ of mandamus’ ordering Judge Brnovich’s removal from the case did not meet the high standard set for immediate relief.”

“Quoting previous Ninth Circuit decisions, the panel referred to mandamus (Latin for ‘we order’) as a ‘drastic and extraordinary remedy.’ It pointed out that petitioners must demonstrate their right to mandamus is clear and indisputable and that the lower court committed ‘a clear error as a matter of law.’”

The panel ruled yesterday that Judge Brnovich had “committed no clear error.”

The trial is now scheduled to begin August 23.

For more of XBIZ's coverage of the Backpage trial, click here.

Main Image: The Brnovichs, Arizona's legal power couple.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Ohio AG Threatens Action Against 'Major' Adult Sites Over AV Law

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost announced today that his office is sending "notice of violation" letters to 19 adult websites for failure to comply with the state's recently enacted age verification law.

Chaturbate Announces 2025 Music Contest Winners

Chaturbate has revealed the winners of its 2025 music competition.

2026 XBIZ Exec Awards Pre-Noms Open With Debut of New 'Impact' Honors

XBIZ is pleased to announce that the pre-nomination period for the 2026 XBIZ Exec Awards, the adult industry’s premier career honor, begins today and runs through Oct. 14.

MYM Launches New Traffic System

German creator platform MYM has launched a new traffic system for its members.

Ukrainian Content Creators on Hook for Nearly $10M in Back Taxes

Content creators in Ukraine owe the equivalent of $9.3 million in back taxes, according to the country's State Tax Service.

Updated: European Patent Office Board of Appeals Revokes EIS GmbH Patent

The European Patent Office (EPO) Board of Appeals last week ruled in favor of pleasure brand LELO in the company's ongoing dispute with Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH.

Eroutique Relaunches Site Through YourPaysitePartner

Eroutique has relaunched its official website through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Update: Pornhub Will Not Block Ohio, Despite AV Law

Pornhub parent company Aylo will not block access to its websites in Ohio, despite new state age verification rules that came into effect Sept. 30.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'ADHD-Friendly' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers with ADHD.

Judge Dismisses Some Claims in 'Children of Pornhub' Trafficking Suit

A United States district judge on Friday dismissed some but not all claims against Aylo in a long-running case involving CSAM allegations featured in the influential 2020 New York Times article “The Children of Pornhub.”

Show More