Australia: Digital Rights Advocates Rally Against Proposed 'Online Safety Act'

Australia: Digital Rights Advocates Rally Against Proposed 'Online Safety Act'

CANBERRA, Australia — Australian privacy and digital rights advocates have expressed mounting concern over the nation’s proposed Online Safety Act, one of the most extreme versions of current attempts worldwide to revise internet regulation and increase the power of the State over online speech and activities.

One of the most peculiar aspects of Australia’s Online Safety Act is that it proposes biometric face scans as a requirement “to access porn,” as Gizmodo and other sources reported last week.

Under the guise of protecting Australian (and minors) from a plethora of real (and also vague or imagined) “online harms,” this extreme version of the bill is currently being rushed through Parliament and has been “drafted to give more powers to the eSafety Commissioner,” the report continues.

This unelected official would have, under the new law, “broad powers to address things such as adult cyber-abuse, image-based abuse and even deal with terrorist content.”

“The internet has brought great social, educational and economic benefits,” Federal Communications and Cyber Safety Minister Paul Fletcher said in December 2020, justifying the law. “But just as a small proportion of human interactions go wrong offline, so, too, are there risks online. By establishing proper protections to help keep Australians safe online, we can in turn help Australians to realize the substantial benefits that come from using the internet.”

The law would allow this eSafety Commissioner to implement “restricted access systems” for internet content it deems inappropriate or “dangerous”

Concerns About Biometrics, Defining 'Abuse'

The proposed Online Safety Act, Gizmodo reports, “allows the eSafety Commissioner to impose a restriction with ‘the objective of protecting children from exposure to material that is unsuitable for children,’ while also considering the burden on an ISP or platform.”

“This means the commissioner could decide that, to access sexual content, users must upload their identity documents, scan their fingerprints, undergo facial recognition technology or have their age estimated by artificial intelligence based on behavioral signals,” UNSW’s Adjunct professor Zahra Szuzsanna Stardust wrote in academic research portal The Conversation, which is widely used by Australian universities and scholars.

Moreover, as Andrew Street wrote for Independent Australia, the Online Safety Bill "seeks to fine sites over half-a-million dollars if they fail to remove ‘serious abusive material within 24 hours.’"

eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, Street continued, "has reassured lawmakers that only abusive material will be targeted and that she has no interest in pursuing adult material. But the law itself doesn’t make much of a distinction and it’s hard to imagine, say, Reddit deciding to risk millions on setting courtroom precedents on what constitutes abuse when it would be cheaper just to blanket ban everything remotely smutty."

'Beyond Using a Hammer to Crack a Nut'

"The proposed e-safety legislation goes beyond using a hammer to crack a nut," Dr. Paul J. Maginn, a professor at the University of Western Australia who studies sex work and the adult industry, told XBIZ. "The proposed legislation and the role of the e-Safety Commissioner runs the risk of being held to ransom by vexatious complaints by individuals and groups who hold not only anti-sex-work views, but who also hold moralistic views about sex, sexuality and sex education."

Sex worker advocacy group Scarlett Alliance tweeted in January that they were "to say the least, disappointed at the recommendations of the report [about the new law]."

Main Image: Australia's Communications and Cyber Security Minister Paul Fletcher. (Photo: Paul Fletcher, MP)

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

2025 XBIZ Amsterdam Website Launches With Call for Speakers

XBIZ is pleased to announce that the website for its annual European conference, XBIZ Amsterdam, is now live.

NC Governor Vetoes Bill Targeting Adult, Could Face Override

North Carolina Governor Josh Stein today vetoed a bill imposing new regulations that adult industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

25,000 Sign Petition to Legalize Pornography in Ukraine

An OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine has amassed the 25,000 signatures required for official consideration by President Volodymyr Zelensky.

WannaCollab Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

WannaCollab has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

FSC Unpacks SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling in Webinar

The Free Speech Coalition conducted a public webinar Tuesday to help adult industry stakeholders understand the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FSC v. Paxton, and its potential implications.

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect in South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Show More