9th Circuit Affirms Ira Isaacs' Obscenity Conviction

PASADENA, Calif. — A federal appeals court today affirmed a lower court ruling over fetish filmmaker Ira Isaacs' obscenity conviction.

Isaacs, who has spent no time behind bars since the conviction in 2012, faces four years in prison over the mail distribution of "Mako’s First Time Scat, " "Hollywood Scat Amateurs #7," "Hollywood Scat Amateurs #10" and "Japanese Doggie 3 Way" — all deemed obscene by a jury.

Isaacs was convicted on one count of engaging in the business of producing and selling obscene matter,18 U.S.C. § 1466(a), one count of transportation of obscene matter for sale or distribution, 18 U.S.C. § 1465, one count of transportation of obscene matter, 18 U.S.C. § 1462(a), and two counts of mailing obscene matter, 18 U.S.C. § 1461.

He had appealed the final judgment in his third trial over obscenity charges; two other earlier trials had been declared mistrials.

Today's ruling by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals — Judges Ferdinand Fernandez, Susan Graber and Mary  Murguia — was based on several arguments made by Isaacs attorney Roger Jon Diamond, both in his appeal made last year and at oral arguments earlier this month.

Isaacs in one argument said that an alteration of jury instructions over the concept of "prurient interest" in the Miller test undermined the credibility of Diamond at the lower court.

The 1973 case, Miller vs. California, set a precedent on obscenity, making a film or artwork considered obscene only if  three conditions are satisfied. One of the conditions ask whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.

Diamond said he used the phrase "morbid, degrading and unhealthy" during closing arguments to define "prurient interest" but he also said "morbid, degrading or unhealthy" in reference to the lower court's jury instruction. The judge at the lower court, U.S. District Judge George King, instructed the jury that they could convict if a movie fit any of the three terms. But later King reinstructed the jury.

"Here, defense counsel himself used both conjunctive and disjunctive formulations in referring to the instruction during his argument, so it is unclear how the revision might have implied to the jury that Isaacs misled it as to the applicable law," the panel said in its ruling.

Isaacs also argued that the district court erred in sustaining objections. At oral arguments last month, Diamond told the panel that his closing argument was "substantially impaired" by a combination of constant interruptions and objections by the government and by King.

"I was instructed what to say and what not to say and I couldn't draw inferences; I couldn't do anything even though in an obscenity case [according to a Supreme Court ruling] all the government has to do in obscenity get the movie to the jury and let the jury look at the movie," Diamond told the panel last month.

The panel, however, ruled that the court did not abuse its discretion in requiring Diamond to confine his remarks to the record

Isaacs further challenged the district court’s exclusion of his proposed opinion testimony about "artistic value" but the panel rejected that as well.

Lastly, Isaacs unsuccessfully argued that the district court should not have permitted an FBI agent to sit with a computer at government counsel’s table and perform searches of publicly available information during voir dire.

The panel said it saw no abuse of judicial discretion and even noted that Isaacs conceded that the claim had no basis in existing law.

Isaacs, who was out on bond during the appeal, was unavailable at XBIZ post time for comment. His attorney, Diamond, declined comment at post time.

Isaacs, according to court procedure, can petition for a panel rehearing or an en banc (full court) rehearing over today's decision.

View ruling issued by 9th Circuit

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Rights Groups File Amicus Brief Supporting Backpage Defendants

Woodhull Freedom Foundation has joined Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, Reason Foundation, and Electronic Frontier Foundation in filing an amicus brief in support of an appeal by the former operators of Backpage.com.

Ava Marina Toplines Latest 'Super Cute' From Hard X

Ava Marina headlines the 20th volume of "Super Cute," from XEmpire studio brand Hard X.

Director Ivan on Living Alt 24/7 and Saying No to Boring Smut

Not only does the AltErotic director — who was recently inducted into the XRCO Hall of Fame — have a healthy respect for the history of the adult industry, but he’s also a student of Hollywood.

Claire Castel Returns to Dorcel for 'Couture No. 2'

Claire Castel headlines the latest feature from Dorcel, titled “Couture No. 2.”

Private Releases 'MILFs at Home'

Private has released “MILFs at Home,” directed by Xavi Rocka.

UK Lawmaker Calls for Ban on Choking in Online Adult Content

British lawmaker Jessica Asato stated in an interview aired on Sunday that she plans to ask Parliament to outlaw online adult content featuring the act of choking.

Feet4Cash Joins Pineapple Support as Sponsor

Feet4Cash has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

Melissa Stratton, Vanna Bardot Featured on Adult Time's 'After Sex Special' Podcast Series

Melissa Stratton and multi-XMAs winner Vanna Bardot guest on the second episode of the “Adult Time Podcast” series “After Sex Special,” hosted by studio CCO Bree Mills.

Cousin Stevie Passes Away at 82

Producer, director and reality TV personality Cousin Stevie has passed away at the age of 82.

Blake Lovely Leads New Scene From Grooby

Blake Lovely stars with Chris Epic in the latest release from Grooby Girls, titled “Banging Blake.”

Show More