Australian Sex Party Calls for Overhaul of Religious Tax Exemptions

MELBOURNE, Australia — Australian Sex Party President Fiona Patten is calling on her country’s government to overhaul tax concessions provided to churches and religious organizations — groups that often fight against personal liberties.

Patten said churches own billions of dollars worth of real estate and successful businesses and are getting a free ride. These groups also often battle progressive issues like same sex marriage and abortion rights.

The party leader also pointed out that Australia is one of the few countries in the world that still allows these tax breaks.

“At a time when the latest figures are showing that less than 8 percent of Australians are regular church-goers it would come as a shock to many Australians that churches are managing to avoid taxes by some billions of dollars,” Patten said.

She added, “A conservative estimate is that income tax exemptions alone to churches and religious organizations cost taxpayers nearly $20 billion a year. Add to that GST concessions, exemptions from capital gains tax (on property and share trading) and the Fringe Benefits Tax Exemption and the cost to tax payers is staggering.”

The Sex Party noted that Sanitarium, owned by the Seventh Day Adventists, is said to have nearly 25 percent of the cereal market valued at over $300 million dollars, is not subject to company tax, and has gained an unfair advantage over its competitors.

Patten added that the exact figure on the amount of taxes not paid by churches is unknown because they report to no one. “After years of lobbying against a charities commission, the churches finally acquiesced leading to the newly formed Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) but alas buried deep in the legislation is an exemption for churches from the reporting requirements placed on other charities,” Patten said.

Despite the claim that they do “good works,” Patten said that the charitable works should be transparent and accounted for (and receive a tax deduction) just as a regular company would do.

Under Australian Tax Office (ATO) rules, to qualify as a charity an organization will qualify even if its sole purpose is for “the advancement of religion.”Patten pointed out that this means the taxpayers are effectively subsidizing everyone from the local priest right through to powerful groups such as the Australian Christian Lobby who argue against many things that the bulk of Australians belief in, such as same sex marriage, ethics classes, abortion drugs, and voluntary euthanasia.

“I will campaign to remove the ‘advancement of religion’ clause from the ATO definition of charity,” Patten said. “Furthermore I am totally committed to abolishing tax concessions for all religions. If their profits are directed to truly charitable causes they should have no fear being accountable just like all other organizations.”

Related:  

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

X's Clarification of Adult Content Policy Triggers International Confusion

X’s recent clarification of its adult content policies has created confusion in countries with strict anti-porn legislation, such as Indonesia, especially considering that owner Elon Musk has said that the limits of his “free speech absolutism” for the platform formerly known as Twitter are the laws of each country.

Strike 3 Expands Copyright Litigation Strategy to Hawaii

Strike 3 Holdings, the copyright holder for the Vixen Media Group brands, has partnered with a Hawaiian law firm to expand its persistent strategy of filing multiple infringement lawsuits in federal court against unidentified downloaders.

Industry Watch: Legal Eagles Assess Turbulence Across the Landscape

Halfway through 2024, and that old adult industry adage is once again confirmed: If it’s an election year in the U.S. — particularly a presidential election year — there will most certainly be a big spike in anti-porn campaigns by politicians seeking to score easy culture war “wins.”

FSC, Industry Stakeholders File Lawsuit to Halt Indiana's Age Verification Law

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) and several industry stakeholders filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana on Monday, aiming to block the state’s age verification law.

Religious Conservative Groups Use Age Verification Battles to Discipline Dissenting Republicans

Religious conservative leaders and publications celebrated the defeat of sitting Republican state Senator Michael Walsh in a primary election on Tuesday, boasting of the success of their efforts to target him exclusively because he voted against the anti-porn age verification bill they supported.

Evan Stone Seeks Republican Nomination for Nevada's District 1

Veteran adult performer Evan Stone will compete on Tuesday in the Republican congressional primary for Nevada’s District 1, which includes part of Las Vegas, Henderson and much of the southern part of the state.

Southern Baptist Convention President to Leave X After New Adult Content Policy

Southern Baptist Convention President Bart Barber announced Tuesday that he will be leaving X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, after its recent clarification of its policy regarding adult content.

Utah AG Files Lawsuit Alleging TikTok LIVE is a 'Virtual Strip Club'

Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes filed a lawsuit in state court Monday alleging that TikTok’s feature TikTok LIVE operates “like a virtual strip club.”

X Updates Adult Content Rules

X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, updated its adult content rules over the weekend, aiming to clarify how NSFW content may be posted and viewed.

Canadian Officials, Experts Lambast Anti-Porn Senator's Age Verification Bill

Canada’s privacy commissioner warned a parliamentary committee on Tuesday that the expansive age verification bill promoted by vocal anti-porn and anti-sex-work Senator Julie Miville-Dechênel has broad censorship implications and could end up applying to mainstream services such as Netflix.

Show More