‘No Opposition’ to Calif. Bill Targeting Porn at Work

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California state employees could be fined up to $1,000 a day for viewing online adult material under a bill that has cleared its first legislative hurdle.

Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia’s AB 546 on “Obscene Matters on Computers in Employment,” would “make it unlawful for any person to knowingly use a state-owned or state-leased computer to access, view, download or otherwise obtain obscene matter.”

Currently, state workers who spend their time surfing adult sites are only subject to disciplinary action, which can vary among agencies.

Now Garcia, R-Cathedral City, says that she wants to even the playing field with $1,000 fines.

“We’re not out to attack the adult industry,” Dillon Gibbons, Garcia’s legislative director, told XBiz. “This [bill] is about the egregious viewing of obscene matter on taxpayers’ time.”

Gibbons said that the issue was first introduced to Garcia by the California Family Alliance, a Christian-based lobbying group based in Sacramento, and that the bill is expected to sail through the Legislature.

“Right now, there is no opposition,” Gibbons said.

AB 546, which next goes to the full Assembly, targets all state employees, including elected officials.

The exceptions would be for scientific, medical, academic and legislative research, as well as investigations by law enforcement agencies. The bill also doesn’t apply to University of California employees until university regents make it applicable.

Under the bill’s language, managers who suspect a state worker of viewing obscene material would first investigate the case and then turn evidence of likely offenses over to the state Attorney General or district attorneys for prosecution.

The penalty would be $1,000 a day plus three times the value of employee time. The offending state employee also could face disciplinary action.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Utah Governor Signs 'Porn Tax' and VPN Rule Into Law

Governor Spencer Cox on Friday signed into law a bill to tax adult websites and make them liable if minors circumvent geolocation.

BranditScan Launches 'White Glove' Subscription Tier

BranditScan has launched its new White Glove subscription tier for creators.

German Court: Regulator Can't Block Creator's IG Account, Only Posts

A German court has ruled that while a regional media regulatory agency may block specific Instagram posts that include material deemed harmful to minors, it cannot ban an entire Instagram account due to such a post.

Brazil Lays Out Preliminary Guidelines for New AV Requirements

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Wednesday signed a decree establishing guidelines for new regulations requiring adult websites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Senate Committee Debates Section 230 Reform

The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing Wednesday on potential changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

Pearl Industry Network Offers Free Creator Memberships

Industry trade group Pearl Industry Network (PiN) has launched its free creator membership initiative.

Sam Bird Acquires Fanblast

Sam Bird, former co-director of global talent agency Surge, has acquired creator monetization tool Fanblast and named himself CEO.

'SheHerGirls' Launches Through Paysite.com

The braintrust behind PoleVixens has officially launched a new membership site, SheHerGirls, also through Paysite.com.

FTC Invites Public Comment on 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced this week that it is seeking public comment on whether it should amend its Negative Option Rule to better address deceptive or unfair practices.

Aylo Rebuts Indiana AV Suit Claims Over VPN Access

Aylo this week asked a Marion Superior Court judge to dismiss Indiana’s lawsuit alleging that the company violated the state’s age verification law by failing to prevent access by users who employ VPNs and similar means to avoid geolocation.

Show More