Michigan Children's Protection Registry Act Stalled

LANSING, Mich. — The idea behind the Michigan Children's Protection Registry Act was simple: protect children from viewing adult content online by letting parents sign up for a registry that would officially bar purveyors of adult products from emailing any addresses on the list.

Problem is, state officials have found enacting such legislation is incredibly complicated, to say nothing of wrought with First Amendment and free speech issues.

As such, the Act still remains in the Michigan House, quietly awaiting approval of two last-minute bills designed to clean up some of its vague language. One bill stipulates the maximum amount violators of the Act can be fined, while the other is trying to make it more affordable for smaller businesses to comply with the Act’s compliance requirements.

State officials said the Act could be up and running as soon as Oct. 30, four months after nearly 3,000 parents and 27 schools signed up for the registry.

The wait time has angered many state residents, adding fire to the already controversial legislation that began last summer when Michigan and Utah became the first states to offer Do-Not-Email registries specifically for children.

The law doesn’t merely target porn producers. Emails that advertise alcohol, tobacco, gambling, lotteries, illegal drugs, firearms and even fireworks are also banned, and Michigan holds companies individually responsible if emails for any of the above products reach an email address submitted to the registry. Violations are currently punishable by up to three years in jail and a $30,000 fine.

The severity of the punishments has caused quite a stir in the business world, with many citing the cost of compliance as a primary issue with the Act. As it stands now, companies must remove email addresses from their marketing campaigns within 30 days of their registration, but to do this they have to pay the state $.007 for each address checked.

Consequently, scrubbing 2 million email addresses would cost $14,000. Checking it every month would add up to $168,000 a year in compliance costs.

Enforcement is another major issue, begging the question how the state will even be able to track down violators in the first place.

“Everyone's looking for a silver bullet, but this is not it,” said Trevor Hughes, executive director of the Email Service Provider Coalition “This law suggests every pornographer should scrub their lists against the registry in Michigan. It's very difficult to enforce that.

“We frequently say many spammers enjoy the impunity of anonymity,” he said.

For now, state officials who support the Act said they would continue to spread the world throughout the state, hoping the recent legislative delays haven’t forced the Act from the public’s consciousness.

“There are thoughts about how we will re-educate the public about this law,” said Dennis Darnoi, a spokesman for Sen. Mike Bishop, who helped sponsor the law. “There's definitely concern too much time has passed.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

AV Bulletin: Age Verification Hits the Mainstream, Ofcom Sets a Date

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

Arcom Reports Age Verification Enforcement Actions Against 5 Adult Sites

French media regulator Arcom released a statement Tuesday detailing recent actions to enforce age verification rules as set forth under France’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law.

Ron Jeremy's Accusers Reach Settlement With Rainbow Bar & Grill

The Rainbow Bar & Grill has reached confidential settlements with a group of women who filed a negligence lawsuit against the Sunset Strip restaurant over alleged sexual assaults committed by Ron Jeremy, according to Rolling Stone.

Sportsheets Joins FSC as Gold Member

Sportsheets has joined Free Speech Coalition (FSC) as a Gold-level member.

AV Bulletin: Two End Runs, Two Failed Bills

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

FSC Helps Defeat Colorado AV Bill

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced that, with its help, Colorado's recently introduced age verification bill has been defeated.

Missouri AG Bypasses Legislature, Declares Age Verification Rule

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey on Wednesday announced a new state regulation requiring adult sites to implement age verification of users, bypassing the legislative process in a strategy not seen before in state-level efforts to mandate age verification.

Attorney Corey D. Silverstein Launches 'Q&A Series' on Social Media

Adult industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein has launched a Q&A series on his social media platforms.

'Over the Top' North Carolina Bill Could Play Havoc With Adult Sites

A bill filed in the North Carolina state Assembly on Monday would impose new rules that industry observers warn could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Swedish Government Proposes Ban on Purchasing 'Remote' Sexual Services

The Swedish government has asked the country’s Parliament to amend Swedish law so that current laws against purchasing sexual services would also apply to acts performed remotely by cammers, streamers and custom content creators.

Show More