San Jose Libraries Consider Using Internet Filters

SAN JOSE, Calif. — San Jose Councilman Pete Constant has asked the city to consider Internet filtering in the public libraries, citing several incidents involving lewd and lascivious behavior in which individuals were accessing sexually explicit content on the libraries’ computers.

Despite the fact that such filtering systems often are hit-or-miss when it comes to blocking explicit websites, Constant said, “a seat belt won't save your life in every situation, but it will 98 percent of the time.”

City Council has asked librarians to research various filtering systems, the cost to the city, and how filtering certain websites might infringe of 1st Amendment rights or free speech.

The city of San Jose rejected Internet filtering in its libraries 10 years ago, despite its acceptance by Santa Clara County, which is where San Jose is located, in the heart of Silicone Valley.

When San Jose rejected the idea of installing filtering systems on public-use computers owned by the city, it cited potential violation of free speech rights and ineffective blocking systems. In Santa Clara, the county’s current filtering contractor is Secure Computing of San Jose for its SmartFilter screening software at a cost of $39.60 for each of the 361 public terminals, or a total of $14,295.60 annually.

However, San Jose-based Christian community standards group Values Advocacy Council President Larry Pegram said he opposes the county model because it requires filters only in children's areas. The filters can also be turned off and children can access computers in the adult areas.

Pegram said that he prefers the system employed by the Phoenix, Ariz., libraries, which uses age verification by checking the users’ library card. The system blocks all pornographic content as well as other sites deemed unsuitable for underage viewers. Users must ask a librarian if they wish to have a site unblocked for the day.

In any case, many critics say that current filtering technologies are too crude to selectively block images or keywords that may or may not be illicit, depending on the context.

The most commonly used systems use a categorized database system, developed by Secure Computing, which groups web addresses and allows the customer to choose what type of content will be blocked. There are more than 22 million sites in the database, and it is updated several times daily.

But advances in screening technologies that can differentiate between an adult website page and a legitimate site with sexual imagery are slow in development. Filters often cannot tell the difference between a breast cancer screening website or a picture of Paris Hilton with no panties on.

“It's not a foolproof system,” Santa Clara County librarian Melinda Cervantes said. “Filters have their holes. What some individuals might find offensive others may not. It's been going on long before computers came into our libraries.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Strike 3 Holdings Sues Meta for Pirating Vixen Media Group Content to Train AI

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings filed suit in federal court this week, accusing Facebook parent company Meta of copyright infringement and alleging that Meta has extensively pirated VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pineapple Support, Streamate to Host 'Navigating Grief and Loss' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Streamate are hosting a free online support group to help performers cope with grief and loss.

Friday is Final AV Compliance Deadline in UK

Friday, July 25 marks U.K. media regulator Ofcom’s deadline for user-to-user services such as tube, cam and fan sites to implement its requisite “highly effective age assurance” measures for preventing minors from viewing adult content.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for May, June

AEBN has released the top search terms for the months of May and June from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Ofcom Releases Transparency Reporting Guidelines

Ofcom, the U.K. media regulator, has made public its official guidance detailing how online service providers — including adult sites — will be required to publish annual transparency reports on their efforts to protect children from online harms.

New AV Rules Take Effect for Ireland-Based Sites

Ireland’s Online Safety Code came into force Monday, including a provision requiring adult sites headquartered in Ireland to implement age assurance measures beyond self-declaration.

XBIZ Amsterdam Calls on New Startups for 'Spotlight' Program

XBIZ is pleased to announce that its new “Startup Spotlight” programming will make its European premiere at XBIZ Amsterdam 2025, set to take place Sept. 2-5 at the Jakarta Hotel Amsterdam.

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

JuicyAds Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

JuicyAds has won its World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) case against a website using a similar domain to impersonate the company's site and defraud customers.

Anissa Kate, Jordan Starr Top AEBN for Q2 of 2025

AEBN has published its top-selling stars for the second quarter of 2025, with Anissa Kate landing atop the leaderboard for straight theaters and Jordan Starr heading up the gay rankings.

Show More