U.S. Justices Won’t Hear Domain Name Battle

WASHINGTON — In a case of particular interest to webmasters, U.S. justices this week turned away a case filed by automaker Nissan Motor Co. over the domain names Nissan.com and Nissan.net.

The Japanese car giant had sued U.S. entrepreneur Uzi Nissan, who registered Nissan.com in 1994 for his computer hardware company, Nissan Computer. He also registered Nissan.net in 1996 for an Internet service provider he founded.

Nissan Motors sued him in 1999 for $10 million, claiming that the word Nissan is its registered trademark and that the company therefore has the exclusive right to use the name Nissan. The car giant also asked the court to transfer the domain names.

Uzi Nissan, an Israeli immigrant, rejected the car company’s allegations in the suit, arguing that Nissan is his family name and also the name of a month in Hebrew and Arabic.

Uzi Nissan also noted that Nissan Motors already owns and can use the domain name NissanMotors.com.

The case, decided without comment by U.S. justices, made its way to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which decided that Nissan Motors’ claim was without merit.

The case first was considered in Los Angeles Superior Court, where a judge ruled that actions by Uzi Nissan didn’t act in bad faith — a factor weighed in federal anti-cybersquatting laws.

In November 2002, a Superior Court judge issued a permanent injunction, allowing Uzi Nissan to keep his domain names, but restricting the commercial advertising and anti-Nissan content that could be placed on the websites.

Uzi Nissan promptly appealed.

The 9th Circuit later ruled that Nissan Motors could not gain protection against any dilution of its trademark because Nissan Computer had made its first commercial use of the mark more than five years before Nissan’s trademark became famous in the United States. The court also said that Uzi Nissan can continue to link anti-Nissan websites.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court dashed all possible hopes by Nissan Motors to appeal the domain-name case.

The case is Nissan Motor Co. vs. Nissan Computer Corp., No. 04-869.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

New Age Verification Service 'AgeWallet' Launches

Tech company Brady Mills Agency has officially launched its subscription-based age verification solution, AgeWallet.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for September, October

AEBN has published the top search terms for the months of September and October from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Creator, Influencer YesKingzTV Passes Away at 47

Adult content creator and social media personality YesKingzTV, aka Micheal Willis Heard, has passed away at the age of 47.

Pre-Nominations Now Open for 2026 TEAs

The pre-nomination period for the 2026 Trans Erotica Awards (TEAs) is now open.

FSC Releases Updated Age Verification Toolkit

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the release of its updated age verification toolkit.

Duke Tax Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

Duke Tax has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

UK Moving Ahead with Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

The U.K. government has announced its intent to follow through on criminalizing “choking” content, a plan that was announced earlier this year.

Italy to Require Age Verification for Adult Sites

Italian media regulator AGCOM has announced that all sites and platforms hosting adult content will be required to implement age verification systems starting Nov. 12 to prevent access by users under 18.

'MILFlicious' Launches Through YourPaysitePartner

MILFlicious.com has officially launched through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Op-Ed: The Guardian's XBIZ Amsterdam Podcast Dismisses Creators' Experiences

British newspaper The Guardian’s podcast coverage of XBIZ Amsterdam 2025 purports to investigate the power dynamics of today’s online adult industry. Instead, it ignores creators’ voices, airs tired and outdated preconceptions about the business, and rehashes the unsupported claims of anti-pornography crusaders.

Show More