Google Cloaking and Stuffing Its Own Pages?

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — Rumors that Google may have been engaging in a cloaking and keyword stuffing activities, forbidden by the search engine’s own policies, have gained more credence, as examinations of Google HTML code seem to point to the search giant displaying different results for surfers than it does for its own spidering tool.

The discovery places an ominous tone on a seemingly innocuous statement made by CEO Eric Shmidt in an August 2004 article about the company’s IPO.

When asked about “Don’t be evil,” the Google corporate motto, Schmidt said, “Evil is what [co-founder] Sergey [Brin] says it is.”

Typically, Google frowns deeply on both cloaking, the act of displaying one web page to surfers and a different one to bots, and keyword stuffing, or placing a ton of similar keywords within a page in order to artificially increase its page rank. In fact, Google’s own guidelines warn webmasters that either activity could result in a permanent ban from the Google index.

A look at the source code of both this page about AdWords policies and a cached version of the same page that Google has since removed seem to bear out the accusations.

While the title of the non-cached version that users typically see reads, “Google AdWords Support: Why do traffic estimates for my Ad Group differ from those given by the standalone tool,” the title of the cached version, the one that is displayed to search engine bots as they spider sites, reads, “traffic estimator, traffic estimates, traffic tool, estimate traffic Google AdWords Support.”

What the implications of a corporate entity like Google, which has a fiduciary duty to its stock holders and, therefore, a right to tailor its engine to make money, violating its own terms of service are unclear, as is whether Google even did something wrong.

The page in question was one of Google’s own help pages and not competing for ranks with outside pages.

“Looks to me like they’re using the technique internally to file things orderly, since they’re generating content that directly populates the database,” wrote Slashdotter Mr. Z. “The nice, handy newline between the keywords and the actual title in the HTML source also makes it trivial for scripts to strip it out later. If they were trying to hide something, they’d teach their cacher to delete the ‘secret’ keyword.”

“Absolutely,” responded pbranes. “People tend to forget that Google is a corporation. They can do whatever they want with their search engine. Their goal in life is to keep you looking at their pages and using their search engine so that they can show you more ads. It’s all about money.”

Google was unavailable for comment at deadline and had not issued a statement about the source code or why they removed the page.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Pre-Nominations Now Open for 2026 TEAs

The pre-nomination period for the 2026 Trans Erotica Awards (TEAs) is now open.

FSC Releases Updated Age-Verification Toolkit

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the release of its updated age verification toolkit.

Duke Tax Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

Duke Tax has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

UK Moving Ahead with Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

The U.K. government has announced its intent to follow through on criminalizing “choking” content, a plan that was announced earlier this year.

Italy to Require Age Verification for Adult Sites

Italian media regulator AGCOM has announced that all sites and platforms hosting adult content will be required to implement age verification systems starting Nov. 12 to prevent access by users under 18.

'MILFlicious' Launches Through YourPaysitePartner

MILFlicious.com has officially launched through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Op-Ed: The Guardian's XBIZ Amsterdam Podcast Dismisses Creators' Experiences

British newspaper The Guardian’s podcast coverage of XBIZ Amsterdam 2025 purports to investigate the power dynamics of today’s online adult industry. Instead, it ignores creators’ voices, airs tired and outdated preconceptions about the business, and rehashes the unsupported claims of anti-pornography crusaders.

Eva Maxim, BranditScan Launch 'Killer' Promo

Eva Maxim and BranditScan have partnered for the Killer Creator Giveaway promotion.

2026 XBIZ Exec Awards Nominees for Online Industry Announced

XBIZ is pleased to announce the nominees for the online industry edition of the 2026 XBIZ Exec Awards, set to be presented as part of the annual XBIZ Honors ceremony on Wednesday, Jan. 14 in conjunction with the XBIZ 2026 digital media conference.

AEBN Publishes Report on POV Trends

AEBN has published a report on POV and gonzo categories from its straight and gay theaters.

Show More