Yahoo Fingered for Unfair Business Practices

LOS ANGELES, Calif. – A lawsuit filed against web portal Yahoo Inc. for unfair business practices inched forward this week following a status hearing in L.A. Superior Court, attorney David Weinman told XBiz.

The case, which alleges that Yahoo unfairly protected people who posted negative messages on its bulletin boards and falsely advertised that it prevents such abusive messages, was filed by Stephen Galton after he was subjected to what he claims were defamatory attacks by several anonymous message board users.

The charges against Yahoo stem from a single incident in December 2003 when Galton logged on to the Yahoo message boards to address a user who had written nasty remarks about the chief executive officer of one of his clients. It was at that point that Galton himself became the subject of the alleged defamatory remarks.

Remarks against Galton included comments that he was a "sleazy parasite, a grossly overpaid poser, a shyster, sleaze ball, whoredog, vermin, fat boy, and a biased ignorant fool," to name just a few of the postings.

Galton contacted Yahoo for information on the identities of the people he alleges had defamed him. But in keeping with Yahoo's message board policy, he was denied any identifying information unless a subpoena was issued.

Galton, of the business litigation firm Galton & Helm, and his partner Weinman filed a proposed class-action suit in August on behalf of all citizens of California who have faced similar situations on Yahoo message boards and who have asked Yahoo to take action, only to find that the web portal refused to stop the behavior or divulge the identities of the alleged defamers.

At the Oct. 15 hearing, L.A. Superior Court deemed Galton vs. Yahoo a "complex case," which means that it has been relegated to a group of judges who typically devote themselves to more intricate, in-depth cases. Judge Wendell Mortimer has so far been assigned to the case, although it is not yet certain if he will be the trial judge once a date is set, which Weinman said could be months if not years down the road.

Weinman suspects that Yahoo will try to dismiss the case long before the trial date.

"The reason we decided to file as a class-action lawsuit is because we feel there are a lot of people in similar situations," Weinman told XBiz. "We can help other people because we're doing a lot of the work anyway, and typically, class action lawsuits get more attention from large corporations like Yahoo than individual cases."

Weinman added that Galton & Helm has so far received hundreds of inquiries from perspective plaintiffs who claim to have had similar experiences on Yahoo message boards.

"Yahoo should fulfill its promise to the public that it does not allow abusive content," Weinman said. "But they simply haven't."

Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Yahoo runs many message boards where users can post messages regarding company activities, hobbies, interest, etc.

Under Yahoo's Terms of Service, users are asked to agree not to post any messages that are "unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable."

However, Galton's lawsuit contends, when message postings fail to adhere to Yahoo's standards, the company provides no redress to persons who are the targets of such abuse, and Yahoo rarely terminates the privileges of abusive users, even after receiving notice of such abuse.

"Our big issue is that Yahoo can protect abusive posters and allow such abusive content," Weinman said. "They are sheltering people over the interests of the people who are getting defamed. Free speech is fine, but you can't defame someone and get away with it."

Galton has also filed a separate defamation lawsuit against one of the message board posters who he was eventually able to track down. The man has been identified as an anesthesiologist living in North Carolina.

Galton claims that the postings by the man, who used the handle "mumioler," were "vicious, personal, irresponsible and defamatory," and he is seeking personal damages.

The other message posters involved in the case have still not been identified.

Yahoo was not available for comment.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Show More