Google's New Explicit Image Takedown Policy Unlikely to Affect Commercial Images

Google's New Explicit Image Takedown Policy Unlikely to Affect Commercial Images

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — Google’s updated policies allowing individuals to remove “personal, explicit images” from Google Search results will not affect most commercial images created by a third party with appropriate contracts and releases.

As XBIZ reported, the policy, which was unveiled last week, was designed to target nonconsensual explicit imagery and to enable individuals “to remove from Search any of their personal, explicit images that they no longer wish to be visible in Search,” Google VP for Trust Danielle Romain shared through the platform’s blog.

At the time, Romain specified that the new policy “doesn’t apply to content you are currently commercializing.”

Still, questions lingered among adult companies and creators about situations involving explicit images of individuals who were under contract and/or had given full releases to third-party content producers, including studios and companies.

A Google rep told XBIZ that under the new takedown policy, individuals “can request the removal of third-party created content that features them, if it has been removed by the original publisher.”

The Google rep directed XBIZ to the full text of the new policy, which states that for the company to consider the content for removal, it must meet the following requirements:

The imagery shows you (or the individual you’re representing) nude, in a sexual act, or an intimate state.

You (or the individual you’re representing) didn’t consent to the imagery or the act and it was made publicly available, or the imagery was made available online without your consent.

You are not currently being paid for this content online or elsewhere.

For non-authorized commercial content, such as pirated material, that does not fall under those requirements, Google instead recommends requesting the removal under DMCA.

Two Specific Scenarios

According to the policy, if Individual A agrees to perform in an explicit sex scene for Company B and signs a contract, release form and 2257 form, which are in the possession of Company B, but then later changes their mind and wants the content removed from Search, the content can only be removed if Company B has withdrawn it from distribution.

Under the new policy, Google would also not automatically remove content if, for example, Individual A agreed to perform in an explicit sex scene for Company B, but Company B later sold the content and transferred the rights to Company C, which marketed it in a way that Individual A disapproved of, leading Individual A to request its removal from Search.

The performer might have other options, however, particularly if the third-party publisher were found to have utilized predatory means in the production of the content featuring the reporting user. A notable example of that scenario would be the GirlsDoPorn case.

Another scenario in which the performer could request removal of search images is if the third-party producer relinquished its rights to the content.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Strike 3 Holdings Sues Meta for Pirating Vixen Media Group Content to Train AI

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings filed suit in federal court this week, accusing Facebook parent company Meta of copyright infringement and alleging that Meta has extensively pirated VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pineapple Support, Streamate to Host 'Navigating Grief and Loss' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Streamate are hosting a free online support group to help performers cope with grief and loss.

Friday is Final AV Compliance Deadline in UK

Friday, July 25 marks U.K. media regulator Ofcom’s deadline for user-to-user services such as tube, cam and fan sites to implement its requisite “highly effective age assurance” measures for preventing minors from viewing adult content.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for May, June

AEBN has released the top search terms for the months of May and June from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Two Texas Bills Restricting Sex Toy Sales Fail to Pass

Two bills aimed at restricting sales of sex toys have failed to pass the Texas state legislature during its 2025 session.

NYC Adult Stores Petition for Rehearing in Zoning Law Case

A group of adult businesses on Tuesday petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit to rehear a case involving a zoning law that could severely limit adult stores’ operations in New York City.

Ofcom Releases Transparency Reporting Guidelines

Ofcom, the U.K. media regulator, has made public its official guidance detailing how online service providers — including adult sites — will be required to publish annual transparency reports on their efforts to protect children from online harms.

New AV Rules Take Effect for Ireland-Based Sites

Ireland’s Online Safety Code came into force Monday, including a provision requiring adult sites headquartered in Ireland to implement age assurance measures beyond self-declaration.

XBIZ Amsterdam Calls on New Startups for 'Spotlight' Program

XBIZ is pleased to announce that its new “Startup Spotlight” programming will make its European premiere at XBIZ Amsterdam 2025, set to take place Sept. 2-5 at the Jakarta Hotel Amsterdam.

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

Show More