Google's New Explicit Image Takedown Policy Unlikely to Affect Commercial Images

Google's New Explicit Image Takedown Policy Unlikely to Affect Commercial Images

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — Google’s updated policies allowing individuals to remove “personal, explicit images” from Google Search results will not affect most commercial images created by a third party with appropriate contracts and releases.

As XBIZ reported, the policy, which was unveiled last week, was designed to target nonconsensual explicit imagery and to enable individuals “to remove from Search any of their personal, explicit images that they no longer wish to be visible in Search,” Google VP for Trust Danielle Romain shared through the platform’s blog.

At the time, Romain specified that the new policy “doesn’t apply to content you are currently commercializing.”

Still, questions lingered among adult companies and creators about situations involving explicit images of individuals who were under contract and/or had given full releases to third-party content producers, including studios and companies.

A Google rep told XBIZ that under the new takedown policy, individuals “can request the removal of third-party created content that features them, if it has been removed by the original publisher.”

The Google rep directed XBIZ to the full text of the new policy, which states that for the company to consider the content for removal, it must meet the following requirements:

The imagery shows you (or the individual you’re representing) nude, in a sexual act, or an intimate state.

You (or the individual you’re representing) didn’t consent to the imagery or the act and it was made publicly available, or the imagery was made available online without your consent.

You are not currently being paid for this content online or elsewhere.

For non-authorized commercial content, such as pirated material, that does not fall under those requirements, Google instead recommends requesting the removal under DMCA.

Two Specific Scenarios

According to the policy, if Individual A agrees to perform in an explicit sex scene for Company B and signs a contract, release form and 2257 form, which are in the possession of Company B, but then later changes their mind and wants the content removed from Search, the content can only be removed if Company B has withdrawn it from distribution.

Under the new policy, Google would also not automatically remove content if, for example, Individual A agreed to perform in an explicit sex scene for Company B, but Company B later sold the content and transferred the rights to Company C, which marketed it in a way that Individual A disapproved of, leading Individual A to request its removal from Search.

The performer might have other options, however, particularly if the third-party publisher were found to have utilized predatory means in the production of the content featuring the reporting user. A notable example of that scenario would be the GirlsDoPorn case.

Another scenario in which the performer could request removal of search images is if the third-party producer relinquished its rights to the content.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

JuicyAds Launches Summer Advertiser/Publisher Promo

JuicyAds has launched a summer promotion for advertisers and publishers.

FSC to Honor Board Chair Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Leadership

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) will honor board chair Jeffrey Douglas for his 30 years of service to the industry at an event on June 27.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches by Country for April, May

AEBN has released the list of popular searches from its straight and gay theaters by country in April and May.

French Court Suspends Age Verification Rule for EU Sites

The Paris Administrative Court has suspended enforcement of age verification regulations for sites based in other European Union member nations, pending a final judgment on whether France’s AV rules align with EU standards.

UK Parliament Weighs Proposals Targeting Adult Content

The U.K. Parliament this week debated proposed amendments to the pending Crime and Policing Bill, including clauses criminalizing “choking” content — and potentially outlawing paying for sex acts in cam performances and custom clips.

Rights Groups File Amicus Brief Supporting Backpage Defendants

Woodhull Freedom Foundation has joined Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, Reason Foundation, and Electronic Frontier Foundation in filing an amicus brief in support of an appeal by the former operators of Backpage.com.

UK Lawmaker Calls for Ban on Choking in Online Adult Content

British lawmaker Jessica Asato stated in an interview aired on Sunday that she plans to ask Parliament to outlaw online adult content featuring the act of choking.

Feet4Cash Joins Pineapple Support as Sponsor

Feet4Cash has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

Report: VPN Usage Surges in France After Aylo Restricts Access to Pornhub

France has experienced a surge in virtual private network (VPN) signups after Aylo, which operates Pornhub, Redtube and YouPorn, cut off access to those sites in the country in the wake of new age verification regulations, business news site MENAFN is reporting.

New Creator Directory 'TrustyFans' Launches

TrustyFans, a newly launched directory designed to help fans discover their favorite creators, is now live.

Show More