ACLU Warns Against Biden's Latest Attack on Section 230

ACLU Warns Against Biden's Latest Attack on Section 230

WASHINGTON — The ACLU sharply criticized President Joe Biden and his administration for his direct attack on Section 230 liability protections, which the White House has blamed for a proliferation of misinformation.

According to tech news site The Verge, the White House “declared war” last week on both anti-vaccine misinformation and Facebook’s moderation system.

“Biden said that Facebook and other social networks were ‘killing people’ by hosting false information about vaccines, although he later softened the attack,” the Verge reports. “Facebook disputed the accusation sharply, promoting its vaccine efforts. And [on Monday], the Biden administration hit back with a troubling — and unnecessary — promise that it was ‘reviewing’ internet law in response to misinformation.”

"No matter which party is in power, the government cannot be trusted to label 'truth' or 'fiction' any more than Facebook or Twitter can," the ACLU opined via tweet today.

Both former President Donald Trump and President Biden, as well as a number of legislators from both parties, have repeatedly stated their desire to “repeal or reform” the so-called “First Amendment of the internet."

The Republican president and GOP senators placed the attack on Section 230 near the top of their election-year agenda in 2020, and First Amendment and free speech advocates had hoped that the Democratic leadership that replaced them in January would be more sensible and defend the 1996 moderation compromise that allowed for the growth of the internet into a social and commercial powerhouse.

According to The Verge, White House communications director Kate Bedingfield indicated that Biden may seek to combat anti-vaccine misinformation by changing Section 230 to make companies “liable for publishing that information, and then open to lawsuits.”

Bedingfield told MSNBC, “We’re reviewing that, and certainly they should be held accountable.”

The ACLU’s stance, however, is that “the president should know that it's not Section 230 that protects social media companies from liability for false information. It's the First Amendment. The Constitution protects people — and social media companies — from government censorship campaigns."

CNN also reported on the history of animosity against Section 230 from presidents of both parties. “Biden has long railed against the law for its protection of social media companies from misinformation, whereas Trump has claimed that it leads to the censorship and suppression of conservative voices,” the news organization reported. “Supporters of the provision, meanwhile, argue that the law protects free speech. Trump's attempts to use the executive branch to change how Section 230 is applied to tech companies was called unconstitutional by legal experts, lawmakers and officials at the Federal Communications Commission.”

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Kansas Senator Dismisses Free Speech Concerns About Her Age Verification Bill

The Kansas Senate Judiciary Committee last week voted unanimously to endorse the state’s copycat version of the age verification legislation being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists, despite Democratic Senators expressing concerns about implications for free speech.

Mile High Media Debuts Streaming Service 'AdultMobile'

Mile High Media has launched its new streaming service,, featuring the studio's entire library of content.

2024 XBIZ Creator Awards Categories Announced, Pre-Noms Now Open

XBIZ is pleased to announce the award categories and opening of the pre-nomination period for the 2024 XBIZ Creator Awards.

South Dakota Republicans Admit Age Verification is Part of National Campaign Against Online 'Filth'

The South Dakota House Judiciary Committee last week voted unanimously to endorse the state’s copycat version of the age verification legislation being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists, which the bill’s backers described as part of a national campaign to fight online “filth.”

BranditScan, Pineapple Support Partner for Mental Health Awareness Week

BranditScan is teaming up with Pineapple Support for Mental Health Awareness Week, today through Sunday.

Fansly Signs On as Presenting Sponsor of 2024 XBIZ Creator Awards

Premium creator platform Fansly has signed on as the exclusive Presenting Sponsor of the 2024 XBIZ Creator Awards, the adult creator community’s biggest night.

Actor Rick Schroder Releases Bizarre Trailer for Anti-Porn Propaganda Series 'Erotic Erosion'

Former child actor and current anti-porn activist Rick Schroder is moving forward with “Erotic Erosion,” a new propaganda series targeting the adult industry.

Florida Republicans Combine Age Verification, Social Media Ban Bills

Republican state legislators in Florida have incorporated a copycat age verification bill, introduced by a pastor and based on other laws championed by religious conservatives across the country, into a larger bill that aims to prevent anyone under 16 from using certain social media platforms.

UK Media Regulator Encourages Companies, Creators to Provide Feedback on New Rules for Adult Content

U.K media regulator Ofcom is encouraging all members of the adult industry, including companies, creators and other stakeholders, to provide feedback to help it establish new regulations under the recent Online Safety Act — regulations that will impact the accessibility of online adult content.

Critics Lambast Revised Version of Controversial KOSA Bill

The main U.S. Senate sponsors of the controversial Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) have released a new version of the bill, which they claim addresses privacy and censorship issues flagged by opponents, but critics insist the revised version still presents insurmountable problems.

Show More