Supreme Court Ruling Upholds Right to Register 'Immoral,' 'Scandalous' Trademarks

Supreme Court Ruling Upholds Right to Register 'Immoral,' 'Scandalous' Trademarks

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Supreme Court struck down today a federal law provision banning the registration of "immoral" or "scandalous" trademarks, calling it an infringement of the First Amendment, but Judge Alito called for Congress to legislate more explicitly against what he considers "vulgar" terms.

“The justices' ruling clears the way for a clothing designer to apply for a federal trademark for his clothing line called FUCT,” CNN reported.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote the majority opinion. The ruling was unanimous in part and 6-3 in part. Kagan was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch in full, while Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor dissented in part.

"We hold that this provision infringes the First Amendment," Kagan wrote, because it "disfavors certain ideas."

The ruling, according to CNN, “could open the doors to more requests to register words or phrases that have been considered vulgar, a concern that the court's minority feared.”

Justice Alito, however, suggested Congress should legislate to more explicitly prevent people from trademarking “vulgar terms,” which he apparently thinks do not play real part in ideological debates.

For the Conservative Justice, nominated by George W. Bush in 2006, Congress should define “vulgar terms” as words that “further coarsen our popular culture.”

FUCT owner, Erik Brunetti, named his brand in 1990 allegedly “to question authority.” Brunetti claims the made-up word, homophone for “fucked,” is actually an acronym for “FRIENDS U CAN'T TRUST."

Brunetti attempted to register his trademark in 2011, but the United States Patent and Trademark Office refused him.

The Patent Office, according to the CNN report, told Brunnetti that FUCT was “the ‘phonetic equivalent’ of the past tense of a vulgar word, and determined that federal law prohibits the registration of trademarks that consist of ‘scandalous’ subject matter.”

"This decision represents a significant victory for First Amendment rights, and will provide broad opportunity for adult businesses that use explicit brand names," Lawrence G. Walters, First Amendment attorney and owner of Walters Law Group told XBIZ. "Some of our clients have been waiting for this decision for many years. The idea that the USPTO could deny trademark registration based on a moral viewpoint has always conflicted with free speech rights. This case finally puts any doubt about that issue to rest."

"The opinion itself," Walters continued "is important for First Amendment jurisprudence going forward, particularly in viewpoint discrimination cases. As Justice Alito said, 'viewpoint discrimination is poison to a free society.' The Court made clear that the First Amendment will not tolerate government censorship based on viewpoint."

The Supreme Court Justices were more concerned with the wording of the federal law, which could be interpreted as preventing “the expression of ideas.”

Kagan’s opinion stressed that the law "does not draw the line at lewd, sexually explicit, or profane marks,” but could be applied to "the universe of immoral or scandalous" material. "A law disfavoring 'ideas that offend' discriminates based on viewpoint, in violation of the First Amendment," wrote Kagan.

According to CNN, the partial dissent, by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Sotomayor, “would have saved part of the statute that prohibits ‘scandalous’ trademarks. Breyer said he would do so because "these attention-grabbing words" may lead "to the creation of public spaces that many will find repellant, perhaps on occasion creating the risk of verbal altercations or even physical confrontations."

"Just think about how you might react if you saw someone wearing a t-shirt or using a product emblazoned with an odious racial epithet,” Breyer wrote.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Penthouse Names Hazel Winters August's 'Pet of the Month'

Penthouse Magazine has named Hazel Winters as Pet of the Month for August.

Onahole Debuts New 'KYO' Cock Ring Collection

Pleasure brand Onahole has introduced its new KYO line of cock rings.

Deviate Launches Adult Industry Graphics Company Gala Design

Pleasure brand Deviate Network has incorporated its graphics department as its own adult industry-focused design company, Gala Design.

Orion Debuts New Styles From 'Svenjoyment' Line

Orion Wholesale has released four new styles from its Svenjoyment line.

Monster Cocks Debuts 'Screamer' Dildo

Pleasure brand Monster Cocks has introduced its new dildo, the Screamer.

Bree Mills Wraps Production on Pure Taboo Thriller 'The Secrets We Share'

Adult Time has announced that production has wrapped on the thriller, "The Secrets We Share," written and directed by studio CCO Bree Mills.

Evil Angel Drops Angelo Godshack's 'Hardcore Gangbangs 4'

Evil Angel has released director Angelo Godshack’s “Hardcore Gangbangs 4.”

Kheper Debuts New 'Hot Naked Men' Playing Cards

Kheper Games has introduced its new "20 Years of Hot Naked Men" deck of playing cards.

European Commission to Assess Pornhub, XVideos, XNXX Compliance With Digital Services Act

The European Commission plans to conduct a study to determine how well adult sites Pornhub, XVideos and XNXX are addressing illegal content and other potential harms under the EU’s Digital Services Act.

Sabien DeMonia Stars in Latest From Brazzers

Sabien DeMonia stars with Jordi El Nino Polla and Danny D in the latest release from Brazzers, titled “Double Stuffed Sabien.”

Show More