Ga. Appeals Court: Items in Browser Cache Not in Users’ ‘Possession’

ATLANTA — A three-judge panel from the Georgia Court of Appeals this month reversed the conviction of a resident of Lafayette, Georgia on 106 counts of sexual exploitation of children, holding that the presence of child pornography images in the man’s Internet cache did not indicate that the man “knowingly” possessed the images.

According to court documents from the case, Edward Ray Barton was indicted on sexual exploitation counts based on photos discovered on his laptop computer. Barton’s wife provided law enforcement authorities with the laptop after the Walker County Sheriff's Department began investigating allegations of child molestation.

Barton was acquitted by a jury on sodomy and child molestation charges, allegations that Barton’s attorney Daniel J. Ripper said came out during the Barton’s bitter divorce proceedings, but he was convicted of the sexual exploitation charges based on the photos on his laptop, and sentenced to serve a jail term of 20 years.

At the jury trial, a forensic computer analyst from the U.S. Secret Service testified that each of the child porn images on Barton’s computer was stored on the laptop’s hard drive within temporary Internet file folders. The agent said that the existence of the files indicated that Barton had viewed the images via the Internet, but hadn’t taken any further action to save them to his computer, and Barton could not have retrieved the images without using special recovery software that he did not possess.

According to court documents, the Secret Service agent testified that Barton had looked at each of the 106 images over the course of two separate sessions that totaled less than four hours on Dec. 2 and 3, 2003.

The agent also testified that even those images that display on unwanted pop-up ads are stored on a computer’s hard drive, but did not say whether any of the images on Barton’s laptop came from pop-up ads.

Barton appealed his conviction, asserting that the state had not demonstrated that he “knowingly possessed” the images, as he had not taken any affirmative action to save the images to his computer, and that he was unaware that the computer had automatically saved the images, and that he had no means to access the images on his laptop.

The panel of appellate judges concurred with Barton, although they expressed clear displeasure in doing so.

“Reluctantly, we must agree,” wrote Judge M. Yvette Miller for the appellate panel.

As determined by the court, the ruling was strictly a matter of statutory interpretation, and hinged on the term “knowingly to possess.”

As noted by Miller in the appellate panel’s ruling, while other state and federal courts have considered meaning of similar terms, “(n)one of those decisions…. found that a defendant may be convicted of possessing child pornography stored in his computer's temporary Internet file folders, also known as cache files, absent some evidence that the defendant was aware those files existed.”

Herbert E. Franklin Jr. of Walker County, the district attorney who prosecuted the Barton case, said that the court’s ruling could make life more difficult for law enforcement and prosecutors in future Internet-based child porn cases.

“With the computer-savvy folks out there … it’s going to limit our ability to prosecute, I would think,” Franklin said, according to Law.com.

Adult industry attorney Rob Apgood told XBIZ that while the court’s decision may not sit well with many observers, the decision was the “proper ruling” under the law, and was consistent with the rulings of other courts in cases with similar circumstances.

“You can end up with material in your cache that you never actually viewed, after all,” Apgood said. “We’ve all had situations where you go to a site and only see the top of the page before you decide ‘this isn’t what I wanted to see.’ You then click the back button and go about your merry way — but the rest of that page is recorded into the cache, whether or not you actually viewed it yourself.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

B-Vibe Spotlighted on Reviewed.com

B-Vibe has been featured in a Reviewed.com round-up of top-rated anal toys by writer Ryan Yates.

Orion Debuts New Style From Cottelli Lingerie

Orion Wholesale has added a new style from its Cottelli lingerie line.

The Cowgirl Debuts 'Saddle' Sex Machine

Cowgirl has introduced its new Saddle sex machine with attachments.

XR Brands Releases 'Jock Enhancers' Collection

XR Brands has introduced its new Jock Enhancers line.

Kyrgyzstan President Signs Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

President Sadyr Japarov of Kyrgyzstan on Tuesday signed into law legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

NC Legislature Overrides Veto of Extreme Anti-Adult Industry Bill

The North Carolina state legislature on Tuesday voted to override Gov. Josh Stein’s veto of a bill imposing regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most creators and content.

Report: VPN Downloads Soar in UK Following Age Verification Deadline

Virtual private network apps, which can be used to circumvent geo-specific age verification requirements, are topping Apple App Store downloads in the U.K. in the wake of new Online Safety Act rules, the BBC is reporting.

Blush Introduces 'Golden Dawn' Dildo From Avant Line

Blush has debuted the Golden Dawn dildo from its Avant Collection.

Orion Debuts 'Nodding Head' Vibe From Sweet Smile Line

Orion Wholesale has introduced the Vibrator With a Nodding Head from its Sweet Smile line.

Strike 3 Holdings Sues Meta for Pirating Vixen Media Group Content to Train AI

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings filed suit in federal court this week, accusing Facebook parent company Meta of copyright infringement and alleging that Meta has extensively pirated VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Show More